Topic: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie - page 6. (Read 2534 times)

I have already told you, if you want to discuss anything with me, post something new. You are repeating yourself like a parrot. You must post something without using your usual keywords, otherwise only thing I see are keywords.

Seems hacker remembers everything now:

I don't call it a war between groups either. I call it a bunch of clowns trying to punish people for criticizing them. Well, you got me! We both use words. That is all the proof needed by the clown car to determine guilt. Tell me, exactly how am I "interfering"?



They get their retribution for speaking a little too freely, and they get to send a message that anyone who is critical of them pays consequences for their actions. It is not moot at all!

That's alright, hacker doesn't remember it, so I guess that means it never happened.

---

I don't think the ban hammer absolves all preceding "sins". E.g. if a solid link can be established between the sockpuppets and it can be shown that he spam-bumped threads with multiple accounts, that should be viewed as a separate issue. However it would likely be a temporary ban anyway so the point of the OP is kinda moot.

I missed that one 

This one...

What 60 days ban?

---

Oh, I just realized that hacker was banned somewhere in May, 2019. and transactions to some fake buzz review accounts came in June 2019. while some accounts continued to spam until November 2019. (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54221633 , https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54221706 etc). Somewhere in that period Theymos introduced new bump system, which likely kicked many fraud services out of business. Hacker claim he stop doing this business, well, that could be truth, yet again, hacker is proven lying cunt so I wouldn't take anything he says seriously.

 So as I read the op.  Hacker was caught and punished admitted he was guilty served his time.

Are there new infractions?

OP could you list the end date of hacker's 60 ban.
Op could you list new sins after hacker's 60 day ban.

Something like his ban ended on  July 18 2019

on aug 2019 he did this post
on sept 2019 he did this post
on oct 2019 he did this post

OR ALL THE SINS YOU HAVE PREDATE THE BAN HAMMER

Exposing ICO bump service or how some people call it, spam service, is not "war between groups that want to control DT"! You will never say that all these users are in war https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/clubthe-spambuster3-cases-openover-3000-accounts-reviewed1800-0908-4720640 you are selectively choosing where to post and what to post.

Account TECSHARE should go to that topic and start shilling for other spambies, especially the ones payed to post fake reviews for ICO's, like he is shilling for this fraudulent service for last 4 months.


For more details check:


It is beyond my knowledge how this plagiarist, fraudulent bump account and spam service got the second chance.

That is correct. I just remembered something 

Sounds about right from your habbit of being biased even in this thread too by ignoring the fact that the OP is full of shit.

Funny, moderator deletes more on topic posts from genuine people and leaves the ones from trolls from this very thread too. I wonder how effective the report on plagiarism would be. Seems there is on going moderation bias by somebody.

That's ridiculous.    


(I am just getting started in a self-directed experiment to work on shortening my posts)

This war between groups that want to control DT and do a big repertory of services is so fun to watch.
Ofcourse I mean services like growing trust or defamation.
Edit:I mean this towards Lauda's group obviously, I don't like/trust TS's either but he never showed untrustworthy behaviour just precipitated thinking/actions and poor admision on his wrong claims/actions and in my case alone since never investigated hi.

This coordinated effort to go after hacker1001101001 only began once he started being openly critical of Lauda. Since then it has been a nonstop procession of all the same clowns that come after anyone who ever says anything that is not glowing praise for Lauda, working overtime to find or manufacture any justification whatsoever to exercise their retribution against this user. None of this is new, nor is it a threat to the user base even if it was. This is just more of the same abuse of any system they can get their hands on to punish people who openly disagree with them.

Use "Report to moderator" and report the posts that break the rules. I doubt there was only one plagiarized post.

A wall of text is unlikely to convince moderators to just ban him again for a previously reported issue.

I would like to see a bit more evidence and proof but one more temp-ban will do him good and forum in general.
Let him spend some quality thinking time

One can't become more naive, workless and mentally effected due to effects of Lockdown and Quarantine more than the OP. Seek doctor's help.

Clearly the double standards bogus kind of flowery fluff we are used to from nullius the hypocrite and scammer supporter.

Hacker0101000101 does not deserve a ban if you are to be consistent and fair. This is even if we accept all they claim about hacker is true.

This is clearly evident if you employ common sense and are not a scammer supporter like nullius.

There are 4 clear reasons why hacker0101000101 should not be banned  


1. We have not banned those that are far more dangerous and have engaged in more ruthless and serious wrong doing. These are on DT and can leverage that position for greater damage.
2. He has admitted his wrongdoing and said he will not do it again
3. Has red tags and not on DT
4. Has not abused red tags to silence those whistle blowing on him.


Those reasons set him at a far lower priority for a ban than other members here.

Punishment or rather behaviors requiring punishment aka a ban. Must be given context so that those giving out the punishment are seen as consistent and fair.

To ban hacker0101000101 now would be totally unfair if you consider the forums best interests and the prior ruthless and much more sinister wrong doings of lauda the scammer and nutildah the willing scam facilitator for pay, even tmans deliberate auction scamming or chibitcity (Who they all begged theymos not to ban) deliberate and totally financially motivated plagiarism  

It is wrong to advocate punishment with no context.  Only context and a full and complete review of a persons entire history can provide you with a sensible objective consistent and fair course of action.

If we compare hacker0101000101 to... for example lauda who nullius praises and supports on DT and basically eats laudas ass daily like a slobbering old perv probably because he believes lauda is female.

If you really investigate lauda who has nullius as his old bitch

1. Lauda undeniable is a liar and scammer.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lauda-scammer-extortionist-nullius-twat-double-standards-cheater-5231720
2. We know lauda was removed from mod because he was strongly implicated in serious extortion with his friend tman.
3. Lauda uses red tags to silence whistleblowers who say they will encourage others to review his history
4. Lauda is in cahoots with another proven auction scammer tman
5. Lauda is also supportive of and is supported by a proven willing scam facilitator for pay nutildah who when busted tries to delete the evidence
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nutildah-willing-to-facilitate-scammers-for-around-300bucks-deleting-evidence-5190369
6. Lauda is caught merit abusing with atriz ( many believe an alt)
7. Atriz and nullius embroiled in a scam with alia. Lauda is there claiming atriz must be left out of this when it is quite plausible it was huge scam involving them all.
8. They never admit any wrong doing at all and trust abuse other who bring it up.
9. Nullius appears to have awoken from a deep sleep for months to suddenly awaken to given red trust to laudas whistleblower and prime critic for " showing empathy"
10. Nullius reviewing the evidence of laudas scamming and nutildahs willing scam facilitating for pay makes up ridiculous excuses and is afraid to discuss them in public.


In summary.

Hacker0101000101 poses a far less openly dangerous and ruthless threat than

Lauda - fortunejack
Tman - fortunejack
Nutildah - fortunejack
Nullius
Marlboroza

These members collude together ( many cycling merits and trust includes) to be in positions of trust.
They then use those trust positions to red tag whistleblowing, trade red tag removal with other members to mutually expunge documented wrong doing.

With regard hacker0101000101

He has red tags, he is excluded, he has a 2 year sig ban already?
He has admitted his wrongdoing

Before any further punishment is considered ( at the behest of scammers and scammer supporters)
Then fair and consistent action or punishment must be taken against them.

Clearly gobshite old perv scammer supporter nullius has an agenda.
Let's  not be peruaded into biased and unfair action by the likes of this sneaky peace of filth.


This calling for other members to be banned by scammer and their bitches is nauseating.
What hacker has done with paid ico bumping teams is wrong especially if they are not credible projects and he knew this and knowingly promulgated false information about them.

Let's start focusing on eliminating the most potent and dangerous scammers and their supporters from positions of trust before we worry about moving less dangerous members from their red rusted. non DT, sig banned accounts all together.

Hacker0101000101 should be treated fairly and consistently.

Remove the more dangerous and less remorseful scammers who are in positions of trust here first. Then you can worry about fine tuning hacker0101000101 current punishment levels.

I would not argue the ban of hacker0101000101 if the more serious threats here are banned first.

I would suggest banning the others and giving hacker a mandatory sig that generates money directly for the forum for 10yrs
A real enthusiast would not object. But only if fair and consistent punishment was given to the others first.

Without context this is an unfair witch hunt by proven scammers and their supporters to crush a member that stood up against them

Do the right thing theymos.  It does not take much investigation to see that most here only wish to milk this forum for all the sig spam, escrow fees, campaign management and protection racket fees they can dominate.

Wakey wakey time to kick off these parasites and let the real enthusiasts for this place flourish. Those that believe in being fair.

I'm not whitewashing hacker. I am painting him his correct shade of gray, not the black to laudas white nullius wants to con people into believing. Nullius is nearer to black than hacker. Willful disgusting scammer protector. Nobody fetches scammer ass like this moron nullius, unless they hope lauda will eventually stand in where alia bailed out or it's an alt of that scammer.

Pushing double standards is as damaging long term here as scamming.

Also jayjuangee is clearly dishonest. Told me he is not advocating punishment for hacker now here he is giving merit to a call for a ban.
You simply can not trust these people.

Unless he want to explain?

Reserved for summary of evidence.

---

At present, I think this is the best capsule summary that I have seen thus far:


(Textual decoration in that last paragraph is added by me.)

Reserved for list of connected accounts.

---

N.b.:


(Text decoration is added by me.)

Reserved for thread metadata (cross-references, forward-references, etc.).