Pages:
Author

Topic: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion - page 24. (Read 29303 times)

full member
Activity: 277
Merit: 108
August 26, 2019, 07:10:00 PM
I have been running Bitcrack on Windows so far, but im planning to use it on Ubuntu 18.04, im just having trouble installing either the Zielar/brichard19 version

make is running fine for BitCrack
make BUILD_CUDA=1 gives me a fatal error terminating that install?

how to solve this?

Code:
In file included from cudaUtil.cpp:1:0:0
cudaUtil.h:4:10: fatal error: cuda.h: No such file or folder
 #include
           ^--------
compilation terminated.

CUDA is installed together with geforce drivers


In your console in Ubuntu type this:
Code:
export PATH=/usr/local/cuda-10.1/bin${PATH:+:${PATH}}

export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/cuda-10.1/lib64${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}}
sr. member
Activity: 443
Merit: 350
August 26, 2019, 04:32:35 PM
I am at 1080ti maximum reached 380 Mkey / s. This is probably normal relative to 1070 and AMD. I wonder why 2080ti is more powerful in ~ 3 times than 1080ti, it should be about ~ 30% (500 Mkey / s). Due to what such a gap, have thoughts?

RTX 2080ti has 4,352 data flow processors, GTX 1080ti has 3,584 data flow processors. So, it is reasonable that GTX 1080ti should have at least 800-900 Mkey/sec. If we have a look through "market price" terms, so the minimum should be 500-600 MKey/sec. Can you try to change and test different parameters b, t, p for block, threads and points? The number b (blocks) try to put 2-3 times more than the number of computing items of your card.

But anyway, thank you for your answer. The previous one I had was just 150 MKey/sec with GTX 1080ti whch seems totally insufficient and wrong.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
August 26, 2019, 03:47:42 PM
I am at 1080ti maximum reached 380 Mkey / s. This is probably normal relative to 1070 and AMD. I wonder why 2080ti is more powerful in ~ 3 times than 1080ti, it should be about ~ 30% (500 Mkey / s). Due to what such a gap, have thoughts?
jr. member
Activity: 85
Merit: 1
August 26, 2019, 10:30:46 AM
I have been running Bitcrack on Windows so far, but im planning to use it on Ubuntu 18.04, im just having trouble installing either the Zielar/brichard19 version

make is running fine for BitCrack
make BUILD_CUDA=1 gives me a fatal error terminating that install?

how to solve this?

Code:
In file included from cudaUtil.cpp:1:0:0
cudaUtil.h:4:10: fatal error: cuda.h: No such file or folder
 #include
           ^--------
compilation terminated.

CUDA is installed together with geforce drivers
jr. member
Activity: 37
Merit: 1
August 26, 2019, 10:09:50 AM
I read again most of the results posted here, and collected them to one table. Of corse results could differ from card to card depending on the settings. I also add the price of the CUDA. I tried to collect some benchmark. If you have some other device - pls, do not hesitate to add  Roll Eyes

Code:
1. RTX 2080ti    1,200-1,300M key/sec  (price $1,200-1,500)
2. GTX 1070      250 Mkey/sec          (price $450-550)
3. GTX 1080ti    150 Mkey/sec          (price $700-1,000)
4. GTX 680       109 Mkey/sec          (price $150)
5. RX 480        107 Mkey/sec          (price $130-150)
6. RX 470        105 Mkey/sec          (price $150-300)
7. RX 580        89 Mkey/sec           (price $200-250)
8. RX 560        50 Mkey/sec           (price $100-150)
9. R9 280/290x   20 Mkey/sec           (price $50)


i got RX 580        110-120 Mkey/sec  with no boost
GTX 1080ti    150 Mkey/sec ?probably just someone did not configure it.I think this is wrong, it should also produce about 900-1000Mkey/s on compressed addresses.Productivity 2080ti percent is 30 higher .
sr. member
Activity: 443
Merit: 350
August 26, 2019, 09:57:11 AM
i got RX 580        110-120 Mkey/sec  with no boost

Thanks. That's reasonable.
So the cards RX 580/570/480 are 2 times less effecient rather than RTX 2080ti. Five cards RX 580/570/480 will cost as one card RTX 2080ti, however have the total key scan rate 2 times less - approx. 600 mKey/sec

Something strange with GTX 1080ti - it cost just 1.5-2 times less than RTX 2080ti, however produces only 150Mkey/sec, but should at least 500Mkey/sec, i guess. Here is that guy: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52246277
Probably, he had very wrong settings...
jr. member
Activity: 91
Merit: 3
August 26, 2019, 09:46:46 AM
i use the random funktion and the --share funktion
so when i take two hex keys and make share and betweeen these shares i take the random starting point generation is it good ?
with -p 3500 i have 24576000 random starting points between the shares
and i also run pollard kangaroo for 105 Smiley
i have 3 gtx 1070 each one make 250 Mkey/s
It is not possible to run the "random" function together with "--share".
The way your configuration works assumes the very high probability that you are scanning the same ranges over and over again... although I do not deny it, because every way is good!

Zielar can you please explain to me why random  should not work with share funktion ?
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
August 26, 2019, 09:23:33 AM
I read again most of the results posted here, and collected them to one table. Of corse results could differ from card to card depending on the settings. I also add the price of the CUDA. I tried to collect some benchmark. If you have some other device - pls, do not hesitate to add  Roll Eyes

Code:
1. RTX 2080ti    1,200-1,300M key/sec  (price $1,200-1,500)
2. GTX 1070      250 Mkey/sec          (price $450-550)
3. GTX 1080ti    150 Mkey/sec          (price $700-1,000)
4. GTX 680       109 Mkey/sec          (price $150)
5. RX 480        107 Mkey/sec          (price $130-150)
6. RX 470        105 Mkey/sec          (price $150-300)
7. RX 580        89 Mkey/sec           (price $200-250)
8. RX 560        50 Mkey/sec           (price $100-150)
9. R9 280/290x   20 Mkey/sec           (price $50)


i got RX 580        110-120 Mkey/sec  with no boost
sr. member
Activity: 443
Merit: 350
August 26, 2019, 09:12:59 AM
I read again most of the results posted here, and collected them to one table. Of corse results could differ from card to card depending on the settings. I also add the price of the CUDA. I tried to collect some benchmark. If you have some other device - pls, do not hesitate to add  Roll Eyes

Code:
1. RTX 2080ti    1,200-1,300M key/sec  (price $1,200-1,500)
2. GTX 1070      250 Mkey/sec          (price $450-550)
3. GTX 1080ti    150 Mkey/sec          (price $700-1,000)
4. GTX 680       109 Mkey/sec          (price $150)
5. RX 480        107 Mkey/sec          (price $130-150)
6. RX 470        105 Mkey/sec          (price $150-300)
7. RX 580        89 Mkey/sec           (price $200-250)
8. RX 560        50 Mkey/sec           (price $100-150)
9. R9 280/290x   20 Mkey/sec           (price $50)
sr. member
Activity: 443
Merit: 350
August 26, 2019, 08:28:06 AM
no this verion of bitcrack dont have random included

can i scan random and save the result of scan?  hex + addr?


What is your goal? I made for myself such a digital lottery - generated a random number between the range and check the corresponding wallet to it. But it was not bitcrack.
Do you want just a list of random hex+addr? It will not be useful cause it will be difficult later to compare all these random results with the already scanned ranges.


i am just start using bitcrack, i was using my own algo on python, but it is very slow, very slow...

can you wrote a command - "generated a random number between the range and check the corresponding wallet to it"   also it would be great to save data. hex and addr for base
 
thanks

The bitcrack releases do not have such options i guess. But it is open sourced, so you can chhange the code and make this thing for your own release )
PS. I also made my own code on phyton, and it was also very slow ) Like 1Mkey for several hours ) But for fun it was good  )
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
August 26, 2019, 07:54:02 AM
no this verion of bitcrack dont have random included

can i scan random and save the result of scan?  hex + addr?


What is your goal? I made for myself such a digital lottery - generated a random number between the range and check the corresponding wallet to it. But it was not bitcrack.
Do you want just a list of random hex+addr? It will not be useful cause it will be difficult later to compare all these random results with the already scanned ranges.


i am just start using bitcrack, i was using my own algo on python, but it is very slow, very slow...

can you wrote a command - "generated a random number between the range and check the corresponding wallet to it"   also it would be great to save data. hex and addr for base
 
thanks
sr. member
Activity: 443
Merit: 350
August 26, 2019, 07:26:50 AM
no this verion of bitcrack dont have random included

can i scan random and save the result of scan?  hex + addr?


What is your goal? I made for myself such a digital lottery - generated a random number between the range and check the corresponding wallet to it. But it was not bitcrack.
Do you want just a list of random hex+addr? It will not be useful cause it will be difficult later to compare all these random results with the already scanned ranges.
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
August 26, 2019, 01:57:21 AM
no this verion of bitcrack dont have random included

can i scan random and save the result of scan?  hex + addr?
jr. member
Activity: 91
Merit: 3
August 26, 2019, 12:34:30 AM
no this verion of bitcrack dont have random included
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
August 26, 2019, 12:28:27 AM

[/quote]
-r is random. this is from pikachu release

[/quote]


doesn't work in https://github.com/brichard19/BitCrack ?
jr. member
Activity: 91
Merit: 3
August 25, 2019, 07:09:31 PM
--share Funktion is possible it shows no error and it works it show the right output everytime with right Keyspace.

--stride don't work and - - save file also not work with - r Funktion.

Why it should not work it never showed an error to me.

when you use random funktion -r with --share then it works

so between the shares it will create all random starting points in the given search space.

Card 1

Code:
[2019-08-25.13:59:57] [Info] Share 22 of 120 
[2019-08-25.13:59:57] [Info] Compression: compressed
[2019-08-25.13:59:57] [Info] Starting at: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003D0624DD2F1A9F72
[2019-08-25.13:59:57] [Info] Ending at: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003D1EB851EB851E6A
[2019-08-25.13:59:57] [Info] Generating random starting points
[2019-08-25.13:59:57] [Info] Counting by: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
[2019-08-25.13:59:57] [Info] Initializing GeForce GTX 1070
[2019-08-25.13:59:57] [Info] Generating 24,576,000 starting points (937.5MB)
[2019-08-25.13:59:57] [Info] Starting point sample: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003D067C0C08D9913A (62 bit range)
[2019-08-25.13:59:57] [Info] Starting point sample: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003D0E86349A31F8A6 (62 bit range)
[2019-08-25.13:59:57] [Info] Starting point sample: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003D14CE227B0C1BFD (62 bit range)

Card 2

Code:
 [2019-08-26.06:20:27] [Info] Share 62 of 120
[2019-08-26.06:20:27] [Info] Compression: compressed
[2019-08-26.06:20:27] [Info] Starting at: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003A5604189374BC36
[2019-08-26.06:20:27] [Info] Ending at:   0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003A6E978D4FDF3B2E
[2019-08-26.06:20:27] [Info] Generating random starting points
[2019-08-26.06:20:27] [Info] Counting by: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
[2019-08-26.06:20:27] [Info] Initializing GeForce GTX 1070
[2019-08-26.06:20:27] [Info] Generating 24,576,000 starting points (937.5MB)
[2019-08-26.06:20:27] [Info] Starting point sample: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003A5C134791C85DB5 (62 bit range)
[2019-08-26.06:20:27] [Info] Starting point sample: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003A6E19170CB5F70E (62 bit range)
[2019-08-26.06:20:27] [Info] Starting point sample: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003A5CC0F427A76254 (62 bit range)

Card 3

Code:
 [2019-08-26.06:13:56] [Info] Share 102 of 120
[2019-08-26.06:13:56] [Info] Compression: compressed
[2019-08-26.06:13:56] [Info] Starting at: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003E2D0E560418931E
[2019-08-26.06:13:56] [Info] Ending at:   0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003E45A1CAC0831216
[2019-08-26.06:13:56] [Info] Generating random starting points
[2019-08-26.06:13:56] [Info] Counting by: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
[2019-08-26.06:13:56] [Info] Initializing GeForce GTX 1070
[2019-08-26.06:13:57] [Info] Generating 24,576,000 starting points (937.5MB)
[2019-08-26.06:13:57] [Info] Starting point sample: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003E342ECDF0ED24D9 (62 bit range)
[2019-08-26.06:13:57] [Info] Starting point sample: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003E36BA7C7174EEE2 (62 bit range)
[2019-08-26.06:13:57] [Info] Starting point sample: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003E418CA94D17F87E (62 bit range)
full member
Activity: 277
Merit: 108
August 25, 2019, 03:41:07 PM
This btcpass - clean (without a virus). It is necessary to pay for this btcpass?
No ... The purpose for which this application is useful here appears in the start log regardless of whether you have purchased a license ... The license includes program functions, and in this case we are interested in a small add-on.

By the way, who is the "creator" of these bitcoin challenge transactions? Does somebody know his name or any other information?
We do not have such information
I know that in 2015 - the creator of this challenge created a thread in this topic ... I don't have a link anymore because I don't need it anymore.
Forget that anyone knows who this person is ... None of these people, for known reasons, do not introduce themselves by name and does not attach a biography with the address of residence and a photo creating such a challenge.

i use the random funktion and the --share funktion
so when i take two hex keys and make share and betweeen these shares i take the random starting point generation is it good ?
with -p 3500 i have 24576000 random starting points between the shares
and i also run pollard kangaroo for 105 Smiley
i have 3 gtx 1070 each one make 250 Mkey/s
It is not possible to run the "random" function together with "--share".
The way your configuration works assumes the very high probability that you are scanning the same ranges over and over again... although I do not deny it, because every way is good!

i have never used the share function, thanks for posting info of how to use that  Smiley
-b should be = GPU compute units x1 or x2 - so this is specific to your GPU
-t is number of threads that will run pr. block
-p is number of keys pr. process
First of all, many thanks for placing the results in the 'CODE' tag according to my request :-)
In answer to your question:
-b = CU number ... i.e. x1
-t = to be max. try 512, and if it doesn't start, set 256 (because that is how much max will start)
-p = as you wrote ... but these are all theoretical concepts that in themselves will not indicate the best option. -p is the only option that needs your time to test different combinations to values that you already know :-)

not understand, can you wrote step buy step what are happening)))
addr.txt - you already got it?
 -r what is it?

-r was turn ON random mode:

ZielarSRC/BitCrack
forked from pikachunakapika/BitCrack.and in my opinion unchanged.
The script itself is no different from the pikachupik version, while its version is for CUDA 9.2. - my fork is configured and has an .exe file running on CUDA 10.1
jr. member
Activity: 91
Merit: 3
August 25, 2019, 03:28:19 PM
yeah is unchanged
jr. member
Activity: 37
Merit: 1
August 25, 2019, 02:56:59 PM
ZielarSRC/BitCrack
forked from pikachunakapika/BitCrack.and in my opinion unchanged.
jr. member
Activity: 91
Merit: 3
Pages:
Jump to: