i have rtx 2080ti speed 1320 mkey/s
With what parameters do you start -b -t -p ?
Topic: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion - page 26. (Read 29427 times)
With what parameters do you start -b -t -p ?
After installing the last driver(436.02), the speed decreased slightly, CUDA10.0
i have rtx 2080ti speed 1320 mkey/s
With what parameters do you start -b -t -p ?
i have rtx 2080ti speed 1320 mkey/s
With what parameters do you start -b -t -p ?
Imppressive! What model of RTX2080 do you have and what is your other stuff? (motherboard, etc.)
Palit GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GamingPro OC, ASUS ROG Rampage VI EXTREME, Intel i9, 64Gb RAM
Imppressive! What model of RTX2080 do you have and what is your other stuff? (motherboard, etc.)
Palit GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GamingPro OC, ASUS ROG Rampage VI EXTREME, Intel i9, 64Gb RAM
Hey I'm only getting about 150Mkey/s with a GTX 1080 ti with the following settings: clBitCrack.exe -c -b 224 -t 128 -p 1024 -o results.txt 1Me6EfpwZK5kQziBwBfvLiHjaPGxCKLoJi --keyspace [blahblahhexcode]
Is there any way to speed it up?
Is there any way to speed it up?
Hi I tried on RTX 2080 Ti found the optimal values in my opinion for her, I get 1100 - 1200 Mkey/s this -b 268 -t 256 -p 1024, when it was GTX1080 I used these parameters -b 256 -t 512 -p 512. What parameter --keyspace to set for search #62 tell me want to try.
Imppressive! What model of RTX2080 do you have and what is your other stuff? (motherboard, etc.)
impressive stats for that rtx 2080 card 
clearly the bitcrack version running on cuda is the best optimized vs. the openCL version
i have 2 machines scanning #62
GTX 680 2GB: -b 32 -t 256 -p 1024 gives me 109 MKey/s
Asus RX480 8GB: -b 64 -t 256 -p 1024 gives me 107 MKey/s
As you can see my RX480 card can't even keep up with my old GTX680 - anyone running on similar AMD cards with better results? please post your parameters and results
clearly the bitcrack version running on cuda is the best optimized vs. the openCL version
i have 2 machines scanning #62
GTX 680 2GB: -b 32 -t 256 -p 1024 gives me 109 MKey/s
Asus RX480 8GB: -b 64 -t 256 -p 1024 gives me 107 MKey/s
As you can see my RX480 card can't even keep up with my old GTX680 - anyone running on similar AMD cards with better results? please post your parameters and results
-b 65 -t 512 -p 1024 parameters 1310 Mkey/S
With these parameters, the speed is the same for me ~ 1203 Mkey/s
Quote
Just one question - what was the principle that the ranges are not incremental, i.e. there are some "spaces" between ranges?
It is the different people scanned these all keyspace, and someone one man has reduced all results in one table.
Therefore between different keyspace there are "blanks", which also need to be scanned if *62 will not be found
Hey I'm only getting about 150Mkey/s with a GTX 1080 ti with the following settings: clBitCrack.exe -c -b 224 -t 128 -p 1024 -o results.txt 1Me6EfpwZK5kQziBwBfvLiHjaPGxCKLoJi --keyspace [blahblahhexcode]
Is there any way to speed it up?
Is there any way to speed it up?
Hi I tried on RTX 2080 Ti found the optimal values in my opinion for her, I get 1100 - 1200 Mkey/s this -b 268 -t 256 -p 1024, when it was GTX1080 I used these parameters -b 256 -t 512 -p 512. What parameter --keyspace to set for search #62 tell me want to try.
https://b.radikal.ru/b43/1908/48/3867e6eba3ad.jpg
--keyspace 13C96A3742F64906:7CCE5EFDACCF6808
but above people write their results, limit yourself
Hey I'm only getting about 150Mkey/s with a GTX 1080 ti with the following settings: clBitCrack.exe -c -b 224 -t 128 -p 1024 -o results.txt 1Me6EfpwZK5kQziBwBfvLiHjaPGxCKLoJi --keyspace [blahblahhexcode]
Is there any way to speed it up?
Is there any way to speed it up?
Hi I tried on RTX 2080 Ti found the optimal values in my opinion for her, I get 1100 - 1200 Mkey/s this -b 268 -t 256 -p 1024, when it was GTX1080 I used these parameters -b 256 -t 512 -p 512. What parameter --keyspace to set for search #62 tell me want to try.
Hey I'm only getting about 150Mkey/s with a GTX 1080 ti with the following settings: clBitCrack.exe -c -b 224 -t 128 -p 1024 -o results.txt 1Me6EfpwZK5kQziBwBfvLiHjaPGxCKLoJi --keyspace [blahblahhexcode]
Is there any way to speed it up?
Is there any way to speed it up?
I don't know about -b 224 but try -t 512 and keep -p 1024
play around with the -b and see what is the best ...
In any case, the cuda code is much faster ... cuBitcrack
Thanks man I'll give that a go, for the cuda code, I have cuda 10.1 and it's built for 9.2 and I can't be arsed compiling on windows as it's a pain lol
Edit: Actually just built it there and was much quicker and easier than I thought, just have to change all references to 9.2 over to 10.1. The problem now is with cuBitCrack I'm only getting 7Mkey/s..
I've used Opencl on Windows and Ubuntu with no issues with both ATI and NVIDIA cards. I've also used cuda on Ubuntu which works perfectly. I can't say the same thing about cuda, c++ and windows , a real pain to get things going but maybe someone with more experience can help you on this.
good luck
It's about order. Push as much information as possible, but not at all. You shit in your own backyard and then walk on your own excrement knowing that you screwed up there! Such a problem, add two tags before and after the code?
P.S. You don't have to worry about my finances ... they are safe.
Know one thing ... I have all my knowledge that I have had and have ever published in this topic - I gave it not to harm anyone, but to help! so don't treat me like my worst enemy because of the last addresses that I opened and that I am also seeking next ones, or because I am asking you for order for the sake of ALL (including you). Do you like to ride this scroll so much in this mouse while going down the subject? I could honestly write that I'm fucked for you, but I respect everyone here and I would have to be total ignorant and selfish to do that.
...because the size of range # 62 is so powerful that you can't imagine it.
what range of keyspace u already did now? P.S. You don't have to worry about my finances ... they are safe.
Know one thing ... I have all my knowledge that I have had and have ever published in this topic - I gave it not to harm anyone, but to help! so don't treat me like my worst enemy because of the last addresses that I opened and that I am also seeking next ones, or because I am asking you for order for the sake of ALL (including you). Do you like to ride this scroll so much in this mouse while going down the subject? I could honestly write that I'm fucked for you, but I respect everyone here and I would have to be total ignorant and selfish to do that.
Quote
So if --share did it, why couldn't he find it?
...because the size of range # 62 is so powerful that you can't imagine it.
Hey I'm only getting about 150Mkey/s with a GTX 1080 ti with the following settings: clBitCrack.exe -c -b 224 -t 128 -p 1024 -o results.txt 1Me6EfpwZK5kQziBwBfvLiHjaPGxCKLoJi --keyspace [blahblahhexcode]
Is there any way to speed it up?
Is there any way to speed it up?
I don't know about -b 224 but try -t 512 and keep -p 1024
play around with the -b and see what is the best ...
In any case, the cuda code is much faster ... cuBitcrack
Thanks man I'll give that a go, for the cuda code, I have cuda 10.1 and it's built for 9.2 and I can't be arsed compiling on windows as it's a pain lol
Edit: Actually just built it there and was much quicker and easier than I thought, just have to change all references to 9.2 over to 10.1. The problem now is with cuBitCrack I'm only getting 7Mkey/s..
I have a situation with the 62nd key, something reminds me of a story about 3 piglets in a college. When the jokers in college launched 3 piglets with numbers 1, 2 and 4. They were found, and then another week they looked for a pig with number 3! :-)
Hey I'm only getting about 150Mkey/s with a GTX 1080 ti with the following settings: clBitCrack.exe -c -b 224 -t 128 -p 1024 -o results.txt 1Me6EfpwZK5kQziBwBfvLiHjaPGxCKLoJi --keyspace [blahblahhexcode]
Is there any way to speed it up?
Is there any way to speed it up?
I don't know about -b 224 but try -t 512 and keep -p 1024
play around with the -b and see what is the best ...
In any case, the cuda code is much faster ... cuBitcrack
thats actually a range i have been scanning, the truth is, that i concluded there was better chances scanning other ranges, so i stopped before closing the gap
Quote
Just one question - what was the principle that the ranges are not incremental, i.e. there are some "spaces" between ranges?
There are no spaces between ranges ...If a given range ends with (take, for example, 2 ^ 9) ends at 1023, then 2 ^ 10 starts with 1024 - no exception.
I mean not the ranges, but the tested ranges for 62bit key (you published them under code earlier). For exaple the 1st 2 ranges are:
Code:
26666553D362A000 266665D7634AA000
2700000000000000 270001B4B2AC0000
But there is a space between 266665D7634AA000 and 2700000000000000. What was the reason for no testing it?
Quote
Just one question - what was the principle that the ranges are not incremental, i.e. there are some "spaces" between ranges?
There are no spaces between ranges ...If a given range ends with (take, for example, 2 ^ 9) ends at 1023, then 2 ^ 10 starts with 1024 - no exception.
Quote
Hey I'm only getting about 150Mkey/s with a GTX 1080 ti with the following settings: clBitCrack.exe -c -b 224 -t 128 -p 1024 -o results.txt 1Me6EfpwZK5kQziBwBfvLiHjaPGxCKLoJi --keyspace blahblahhexcode
Is there any way to speed it up?
Use cuBitCrack.exe (for NVIDIA [CUDA] cards) instead of clBitCrack.exe (for all the rest)Is there any way to speed it up?
Increase -t to 256
Code:
cuBitCrack.exe 1Me6EfpwZK5kQziBwBfvLiHjaPGxCKLoJi -c -b 224 -t 256 -p 1024 --continue checkpoint.txt -o resaults.txt --keyspace 12345:67890
I also don't think that -b is set correctly ... try -b 56 -t 256 -p 1024
Jump to: