So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
In that case, both the bounty managers and the bounty hunters are to be blamed. Before joining in a bounty campaign, bounty hunters should take a look first at the whitepaper. Bounty managers should do the same too. We are all given the chance to read first before we do the task. Reading has no cost. 
Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 60. (Read 5981 times)
What sense to accuse the bounty manager if he the same victim, as well as all other participants. He was deceived in the same way, even more he has made a sufficient part of organizing work and all for nothing!
I guess it's so much dependent on the case...you can't always blame the manager if he's external to the project. Though it is likely that he will have a bad reputation anyway
After such situations, the trust in such managers simply disappears and they do not have good projects after that and they no longer believe in and end their projects and say bad responses about them.
We don't know if they knew that the project will turn out scam. If they knew it from the beginning - just leave them and never join again. If not - he is not responsible for the team decisions. Anyway, they got their money if the project is scam or not 
Actually, in the case of Uchit to blame is the developer, they cheat everyone to participate in order for their project to succeed. The bounty manager did not know because he was not part of Uchit's team, he was only paid to organize the bounty participants, but I think the bounty manager was slow to know that Uchit SCAM and this made the bounty guys angry because of the delay action from the bounty manager.
If there's suspicion that the bounty manager works with the team, then yes, he's to be heavily blamed or even punished/banned/prosecuted/...
If there's no such suspicion, then the main blame's on the people who participated on the project. The manager is to be blamed too in this condition, because of not doing enough research or not giving the red signal to the community soon enough, but IMHO a community whose collective mind didn't detect a scam soon enough is worse.
If there's no such suspicion, then the main blame's on the people who participated on the project. The manager is to be blamed too in this condition, because of not doing enough research or not giving the red signal to the community soon enough, but IMHO a community whose collective mind didn't detect a scam soon enough is worse.
In most instances.its not air blaming the bounty managers, sometimes there is nothing they could have done to stop the scam, they may just be unaware just as the hunters, and have probably fallen victims too, we should go easy on them, However, the bounty managers should share the blame, i think its upon the manager to deeply look into the program before accepting have anything to do with it, look into all the aspects and analyse the possibility that its a scam or not, so there i a shared responsibility in this case
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
No that's not relevant at all just remember Bounty Managers are just paid to manage the the specific campaign however if the scammed is purposely done by the team or the developers itself ,Bounty Manager is not liable at all as we see in the very beginning goodwill and trust is the only thing that bind in the Campaign. the bounty Hunters are also need to examine every Campaign he/she wants to join. and no one force us to join at any campaign. so lets say work at our own risk
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
You know what....? People tend to blame someone if they get disappointed about the result.... We can't blame a bounty hunters for their wrong judgement.... But we should not blame bounty manager because it is not their fault... They are not perfect also and they cant predict if the project is scam or not.... We should always think that they are also a victims of this scam.... The one we should blame is the scammer itself.... Working here in crypto is something risky we need to accept that sometimes we will encounter it... So all of us should be aware and we need to be open minded....
I think we should not blame bounty managers. They are not forcing you to join in that bounty. They are just like us working for the ICO. Its totally the hunter's responsibility to investigate the ICO whether its scam or not and later make decision.
Most of the time the bounty managers doesn't have the control on bounty distribution, they just count the satkes and send them to the ICO managers then they do the sending so I think bounty managers are the one to blame on bounty scams.
Bounty managers are just human,,, do not forget this. Yes, just like every human, some are good and some are bad. But the ones I have personally worked with in one year on this forum are all excellent, and you can see this not just by the way they conduct themselves but by their trust ratings, and countless feedback they receive over the years.
Of course, there is always one or two bad apples, and some managers are guilty of accepting known risks. But can they be blamed fully? Bounty participants sometimes never research their own campaigns. Do not even know what they are promoting.
Of course, there is always one or two bad apples, and some managers are guilty of accepting known risks. But can they be blamed fully? Bounty participants sometimes never research their own campaigns. Do not even know what they are promoting.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Well if they know that the bounty will turn out to be a scam and chooses to ride with them then you can blame them. However, if they themselves didn't get any rewards for managing the bounties then I think they are not that guilty. And besides, managers doesn't have full control because usually the tokens are not escrow because the bounty distribution is mostly at the end of the ICO itself.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Why do bounty hunters get blamed? Is it because they help to sell fraudulent items? In fact, I think Bounty Hunters should not be blamed. Since hunters have formed an industry, most of them do not understand the situation. They are like mercenaries. Their purpose is only to get a little reward for their own efforts. On the contrary, I think the responsibility of the bounty manager is even greater. After all, they are responsible for the projects they should represent. They brought these frauds to everyone and recruited bounty hunters to help promote them. Whose fault is this kind of thing? I think that the responsibility of the bounty manager is greater, and bounty hunters can only be accomplices.
When I joined the ICO project, I will check their background. If they trusted enough, I will join !
If the project is being fraud, I can't blame the manager 100% except if the manager also try to do the fraud attempt with the project
Cryptocurrency is still risky so make sure that you've prepare the worst !
If the project is being fraud, I can't blame the manager 100% except if the manager also try to do the fraud attempt with the project
Cryptocurrency is still risky so make sure that you've prepare the worst !
Bounty manager cant predict that as its an unforeseen circumstances which can happen to anyone , The bounty manager only needs to do more research on projects before accepting to manage it. .
Bounty Manager is not part of the development team. He clearly does not intend to take part in fraud. But it is the Manager's responsibility to make sure that the project he moderates is not a Scam. The Manager makes a primary analysis. His reputation depends on it. But the main responsibility lies on those who decided to take part in the project. How can you make a claim to the Manager if you do not see signs of fraud?
Who knows which ICO is scam? When investors do not know it after a deep research so how could bounty manager know it?
Not at all the bounty manager is not responsible of what the team can do, his job is to distribute reward and manage the marketing part of the project on Bitcointalk hoping earn some token also if the team choose to scam their investor, the partcipant must understand that and accept their loss.
The manager was also looking for token so the scam affect him too because he work for nothing.
The manager was also looking for token so the scam affect him too because he work for nothing.
Jump to: