Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 61. (Read 5969 times)
The manager also did not know about it. He's just running his duties as the manager who is also looking for earnings. Don't be so thoughtless as to one just because there are still many ICO ICO other far more productive. the scam has become a risk since early in crypto and this must be passed though there is every time.
You can't blame bounty managers if a project fails at the end of the day. They are not the development team. They function as channels through which project teams are connected with bounty hustlers. If there is any problem about any project, the team behind the project should rather be blamed.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Most of the situation like this, I think the one who blame is the bounty manager. The big responsible is there hands because he/she is the one who do the hunting and the expert for that if they detect the scamming action happen, they should publish it to the group to stop the effort of the team without the exchange of there hardwork.
I think you should not blame the bounty manager for the project being a scam, because he might not know about it. He just did his job and that's it. Managers know just as much as bounty hunters.
Many bounty managers just work for the money, despite the project, without analyzing it and without checking the team, of course it will also fall a lot of criticism,as it turns out for one with the scammers.
I don't know what's the real score but you said it right,most of those new campaigns who supposedly hire well known managers but instead hire a low profile and a new one which only works for money, I guess they need to sort the project before accepting the job so it will be their task to check the integrity of the team, managers should be responsible enough to protect the workers and the investors as well. 
Bounty manager only works for himself not for ico team..
I think you have no right to blame the bounty manager.
i agree. Bounty manager works for himself.I think you have no right to blame the bounty manager.
before participating in the campaign-incentives for past campaigns where the bounty manager worked
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I did not follow the project, so I can not blame her manager. moreover a bounty manager has understood the marketing strategy and of course this has been discussed earlier with Uchit developer ico. so I guess you should ask the DT members, so that those who overcome this
It is not easy for Bounty managers to predict scam. It is better to talk to Bounty manager ad make a solution by which you can contact team of ICO , if it is scam then take help of bounty manager and raise voice against ICO team.
Bounty managers should not be blamed since it is the projects itself that is not working. Projects are build together with feasibility study and all needed data to support it. But unfortunately there are some that will not succeed. I can say that it is a failed projects and not the bounty managers fault.
Many bounty managers just work for the money, despite the project, without analyzing it and without checking the team, of course it will also fall a lot of criticism,as it turns out for one with the scammers.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Both side are to be blame but the bounty manager should be blame most because he ought to check the bounty himself or herself before announcing it, on the part of the bounty participant too, as a participants you suppose to evaluate the type of bounty you want to do even along the line there are sign you can see which will point to you to know if the bounty will end up being a scam. Thats completely insane to do. How can a bounty manager would know what went wrong and what those people were upto? One thing is clear in the crypto space that bounties and related ICO's can get scammed at anytime in their roadmap or whatever intentions they carry. We cant just know it definitely whether the crypto is legit or not unless and until they get to full scale model. Its not fault of the bounty manager and he should not be blamed at all. We participate in the bounty on our will so why he should be blamed at all.
I completely agree with you. A bounty manager is only doing what is hes job, and further than that the responsibility of whether paying the rewards or not are the ones behind the project. The bounty manager is nor responsible of paying you, aside from that he is not the one holding all the payment funds. So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I can’t blame a bounty manager because nobody wants it’s reputation to be tarnished by scam icos
Literally nobody is perfect so despite the researches and information sort after, an ico can outsmart a bounty manager
For instance if you participated in hashcard bounty
The ico was fraud, but fortunately everyone the bounty manager detected but a little late
We all have to be careful
We can’t rely on blame game
Thats completely insane to do. How can a bounty manager would know what went wrong and what those people were upto? One thing is clear in the crypto space that bounties and related ICO's can get scammed at anytime in their roadmap or whatever intentions they carry. We cant just know it definitely whether the crypto is legit or not unless and until they get to full scale model. Its not fault of the bounty manager and he should not be blamed at all. We participate in the bounty on our will so why he should be blamed at all.
should bounty managers know all about the project to be run, so unlike Uchit, it has been a long walk just know if the scam. Indeed ico project is not necessarily successful if you have a good bounty manager. But a good bounty manager will tell you if the project is scammed, Ico fails, Ico is postponed, Ico is successful.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
No they should not be blamed at all!
When you join a bounty then you are always joining a risky investment of your time and efforts. Neither bounty manger knows what would be the future of that bounty and neither we the hunters.
Just remember one thing, when an ICO is scammed then its not just bounty hunters who dont receive the payments but it is also the bounty manager himself who remains unpaid. So everything is on everyone's head!
I think the bounty hunters are not being fair to the manager. It is also their responsibility to do thorough research about the project before joining so i do not think they can blame anyone
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
No they should not be blamed at all!
When you join a bounty then you are always joining a risky investment of your time and efforts. Neither bounty manger knows what would be the future of that bounty and neither we the hunters.
Just remember one thing, when an ICO is scammed then its not just bounty hunters who dont receive the payments but it is also the bounty manager himself who remains unpaid. So everything is on everyone's head!
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I think it's fair to blame bounty managers. If people will study the projects well, there will be less scam in the ICO. Bounty Manager must carefully select projects.
Bounty same workers like every news aggregators. That's work provide and promotion projects. First of all, they don't know where is a scam, secondly it's free market without rules and it's good.
why are they to blame? because ICO failed? or just a fraud? I think bounty managers should not be blamed, because they are not the team or dev, of the ICO.
Jump to: