i am glad that in did not invest in this ICO. read this: http://themerkle.com/top-three-failed-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-icos/
Ark, a service aimed to bridge blockchains and develop new distributed services, has an inexperienced team with no clear market, and a very doubtful technological backbone powering this solution. Despite attracting investors early, mainly due to very suspiciously large bonuses, interest in the project died off rather quickly. A token exchange campaign is still going on, but it remains to be seen how viable this program will be in the long run.
Ark, a service aimed to bridge blockchains and develop new distributed services, has an inexperienced team with no clear market, and a very doubtful technological backbone powering this solution. Despite attracting investors early, mainly due to very suspiciously large bonuses, interest in the project died off rather quickly. A token exchange campaign is still going on, but it remains to be seen how viable this program will be in the long run.
So if someone write his opinion you just listen it like a sheep ?
no. i can't listen to written text. are you able to hear what is written in books?
and no. i just posted the link. and if this would be a selfmod topic then this would be deleted.
lol see you are a troll. GTFO.
to be honest. i expected a discussion about the content of this article.
i can't judge about the tech-side.
i don't know the people behind ark. so i don't know if they are experienced or not.
but :
- i can see that there are a lot of bounties and lots of bonuses in ark campaign.
- i see that there is just GTFO, troll or Lisk-Shill.
thats why i think know that everything in this article is true. or you show me that this it not.
