Topic: ARK - DPoS 🔹 ARK Protokol 🔹 MarketSquare 🔹 IPFS 🔹 Staking on Binance 🔹 - page 538. (Read 781308 times)

Yes sadly that is the case.  If we don't have 2000 btc by 11 DEC then we will issue an opportunity for refunds to all participants.

Everyone at ARK understandably do not wish for this to happen as we have spent a very long time on our project so far in preparation for our TEC and would be pretty devastating to have to refund everyone, but that is what must be done.


We have discussed the possibility of refunding those who would like to have a refund and also still launching with the amount of people who do not request a refund or after all refunds, we will can sell tokens ourselves from mainnet over time as we are developing during mainnet.

We might have to refund everyone, but it will not kill our project.  We will just have to figure out some other method after refunds are completed per the agreement.

I will stay away from ark and LISK both after seeing the non sense here.

This seems still running and still enough time to reach the threshold

The threshold will not be met? All funds will be refunded?

it seems the tension starts to heat up here,


I do not know what is behind it all,
but the problem in Lisk blockchain indeed inhibit the progress of the ARK campaign.

as I'm sure many investors are experiencing the same thing as I faced when they tried to move their LSK balance, and they might cancel investments because of frustration. and to be honest it is quite frustrating to resolve this withdarawal issue. after I canceled withdawal in polo I myself finally resorted to dump my LSK balance that I bought,  because it must wait for many days to take care of it . some people may even blame the service of the exchanger as I did before. I myself had blamed polo and changelly when facing that problem on withdarawal even though it could be it was not entirely because of their fault, when there was indeed a problem on Lisk blockchain.
so indirectly Lisk already damaging the reputation of their partners for this network issue.

if this is a manipulation seems ARK does not need to focus for the fight.
now i think it seems ARK enough to make plan B to make a bonus equal or comparable between Lisk and BTC, to attract investors who use the BTC and to reach the threshold, rather than be stuck in a war with their clan, maybe you could ask voting to investors about the changes of this bonus to prove you are consistent and this must be done because to avoid the failure of the external factors were not for your desire from the beginning.

I think the balance of accumulated LSK now have enough to hedge. i think the real war will happen later when you can show your project successfully, and then you can prove that what you do better than them. and I believe ARK has the ability to prove it,

 This will be a better fight look likes as the fight of david vs goliath and in the story goliath eventually die because of his arrogance

lot of lisk fanatics trying to FUD our project.  They are threatened, easy to see.

no lol sorry, I didn't realize it was a quote.  My bad

But to TutenStain

I don't like quarrelling and conflicts.  

cannabanana must comply with business etiquette. He scared all investors. Scandals only cause harm ARK.  
It was not competent and he does not know how to do business. He spoiled ICO. Too many negatives. Kick him from team.  

if your going to use photos, don't cut out the good stuff where Oliver calls me a Prick doing the same thing as I.

A lot of people who think themselves better than thou are just as bad as me.

You do it in a more conniving and rat like in way more than me, but just as obvious.


I will say the truth as I see it at all times.  I don't bend on my morals and ethos, of which I have proven my worth to real people.

I'm sure more than a handful of you are worse than I am in Real Life.

I wonder how many of you are just the pot calling the kettle black.

Yes I am a member of the ARK team and I am also heavily invested in Lisk.  I still have a Lisk main net node running for over 7 months now.  What do I get out of it?  Nothing but I still support
Lisk network.



If you say so...


-tb-

I do not think you should give moral lessons to anyone, especially to people with whom you have not crossed a single word. If you think that we are so bad you know what you have to do, go with the ones you think are the good ones.

you know it's ready



all participants will get a refund after the TEC ends if we don't reach 2000 BTC.

What is the effect of the bitcoin prices continue to climb so that ICO ARK remained at 1 million dollars

post this to max then.

No way that whoever speaks loudest is the baddest.  That's nonsensical.

If they used ETH and BTC instead of shitty LISK, they would have more than 2000 BTC right now, but they chose shitty LISK. Bad idea

Are you blind?!
Oh sorry, you are from the Ark team.
Canna is the idiot. Everywhere he spreads nonsense, lies, FUD. The people just react to it. Not vice versa.

And your statement confirms my opinion:


So I'm not a Lisk fanboy. But I have respect for their work. And I like their sound, quite the opposite of the Ark team.

As an "outsider" with no particular loyalty to ARK or LISK. I find it worrying that members of both teams get involved with bickering. Personally it doesn't matter if someone is officially part of the team or just "closely involved". The impact and reputational damage is the same - use of profanities and the insulting of others of opposing view is not professional.  It's not even that humorous (and I do like a joke).

I wonder how many of these people have ever operated in a pressured technically challenging commercial environment. In which you're challenged and asked to defend your views with fact based reasoning in a concise and professional manner. When i read some of the arguments on this thread - I begin to have doubts about both LISK and ARk projects. And I say that as an investor in both. It seems in Crypto certain habits are hard to stop. I mean if the goal of these projects is to get their solutions adopted by big companies - are you going to tell the CTO of a major company "to STFU" because they challenge your projects value? Heaven forbid anyone from outside of the crypto world read this forum.

No doubt the actions of a few blur the good work done by others in the background. But a little more professionalism on all sides wouldn't go amiss.

[gets off soapbox]

Hup Hup Ark