Author

Topic: ARK - DPoS 🔹 ARK Protokol 🔹 MarketSquare 🔹 IPFS 🔹 Staking on Binance 🔹 - page 580. (Read 781327 times)

hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 515
Quote
If your transactions are on a LISK blockchain explorer then you will get 120% bonus don't worry - double check. You can also send an email to [email protected] and our dev will take a look at it.

To join our slack go to : https://ark.io/join-ark-slack to get auto-invite.

and what if poloniex is holding my lsk withdrawal for several hours now? Sad

Open a support ticket with them they usually respond within few hours.
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
If your polo lisk is pending one thing I thought of if you want to do it is cancel your withdrawal of lisk from polo
sell it for bitcoin, transfer bitcoin to bittrex and buy lisk there and send.  Bittrex has had no issues sending Lisk to us all day.
but you will probably lose some value in the process.
but it is another option.

Super genius, Mr.song   Grin  Bittrex has instant withdrawals, so following your steps are very practical, very brilliant idea and solution, hope more people can get 120% bonus.
I stored my Lisk in a wallet off of an exchange which is much safer. And quicker as we all just found out. I know it's too late for those who didn't but in the future I'd recommend storing any coins you own off of the exchanges.
sr. member
Activity: 279
Merit: 250
If your polo lisk is pending one thing I thought of if you want to do it is cancel your withdrawal of lisk from polo
sell it for bitcoin, transfer bitcoin to bittrex and buy lisk there and send.  Bittrex has had no issues sending Lisk to us all day.
but you will probably lose some value in the process.
but it is another option.

Super genius, Mr.song   Grin  Bittrex has instant withdrawals, so following your steps are very practical, very brilliant idea and solution, hope more people can get 120% bonus.
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
Can someone tell me why Lisk price are decreasing? I projected that since there is a bonus on Lisk at Ark that Lisk will be bought more and the price will increase, but it does not...

Someone is playing with the market - my advice don't get to emotional if you are trading and buying / selling LISK.
haha no i do not get emotional, i was just wondering because you would expect that the Lisk price would do the opposite of what it does now haha
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 501
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
No doubt this TEC can reach 10mi$ easily!

Lets go guys! Get your tickets to ARK
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 515
Can someone tell me why Lisk price are decreasing? I projected that since there is a bonus on Lisk at Ark that Lisk will be bought more and the price will increase, but it does not...

Someone is playing with the market - my advice don't get to emotional if you are trading and buying / selling LISK.
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
Can someone tell me why Lisk price are decreasing? I projected that since there is a bonus on Lisk at Ark that Lisk will be bought more and the price will increase, but it does not...
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 515
It has been 12 hours since I send the two LSK transfers to the same address for ARK.  After I did it I read it would be taken care of manually so I did not say anything.  It has not been taken care of manually.  I attempted to join your Slack to see what I need to do, and could not get on.

Is there anything I need to do, or anyone I need to contact to get this credited during the 120% period?

Thanks

If your transactions are on a LISK blockchain explorer then you will get 120% bonus don't worry - double check. You can also send an email to [email protected] and our dev will take a look at it.

To join our slack go to : https://ark.io/join-ark-slack to get auto-invite.
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
It has been 12 hours since I send the two LSK transfers to the same address for ARK.  After I did it I read it would be taken care of manually so I did not say anything.  It has not been taken care of manually.  I attempted to join your Slack to see what I need to do, and could not get on.

Is there anything I need to do, or anyone I need to contact to get this credited during the 120% period?

Thanks
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 515
Minimum was always set at 2000 BTC read the OP which is currently ~1.4m

Just saw that the dev allegedly entered the wrong valuation. So it's less of an increase than I thought.

On October 15th when the OP was announced Bitcoin was $635 and at $615 on October 11th when you likely had already decided the thresholds (if I'm guessing). Might have even been before then.

That's 2000*636 = $1,270,000 or $1,230,000 for the latter.

It's not too much of a difference now anyway.



Yeah sorry about that we had that progress fixed set when we where still testing our TEC website to 1m, we are now using 2000 BTC as a reference on our website, but to get this project moving we need ~ 1.25m equivalent you are correct. Lets just do everything we can to get past that point ASAP so we can all be assured this thing is happening!
hero member
Activity: 1014
Merit: 1055
i asked in the polo trollbox and got that answer

Atlanta: christof, No, I can't speed it up. There is a delay with this wallet at the moment. I do appreciate your patience while it progresses.

Hope you guys make it!

Oldgamejunk: diggi, The nature of the LSK wallet causes the delay, it is not our fault:-)

so its not a tech problem. its natural caused LOL

hero member
Activity: 1014
Merit: 1055
If your polo lisk is pending one thing I thought of if you want to do it is cancel your withdrawal of lisk from polo
sell it for bitcoin, transfer bitcoin to bittrex and buy lisk there and send.  Bittrex has had no issues sending Lisk to us all day.
but you will probably lose some value in the process.
but it is another option.

once the transaction is done, i would recommend to make then a customer service to recalculate the bonus or extend the period, because of technical problems - not thinking about conspiracy. otherwise you would get bad promotion at the beginning as a tech developer. maybe its fault of poloniex, what i understand, you cant do anything about it.

Polo and Bittrex withdrawals are out of ours hands so everyone should contact their support, but if your TX is recorded on a LISK blockchain you will certainly get 120% bonus (before first 24h are up).

Oldgamejunk: diggi, The nature of the LSK wallet causes the delay, it is not our fault:-)

nee, its not polos fault, they are saying. its lisks fault, so lisks support should be contacted. well.
sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 261
Epic Lisk grab, well played.
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10

We are already at over 3 million LISKS exchanged! Thank you for your support! Still a little over 7 hours to get your 120% LISK  / 30% bonus in! How much LISK / BTC will be exchanged after first 24h ?
I think we can do $1m in the first 24 hours.  Grin
hero member
Activity: 722
Merit: 500
Minimum was always set at 2000 BTC read the OP which is currently ~1.4m

Just saw that the dev allegedly entered the wrong valuation. So it's less of an increase than I thought.

On October 15th when the OP was announced Bitcoin was $635 and at $615 on October 11th when you likely had already decided the thresholds (if I'm guessing). Might have even been before then.

That's 2000*636 = $1,270,000 or $1,230,000 for the latter.

It's not too much of a difference now anyway.

hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 515

We are already at over 3 million LISKS exchanged! Thank you for your support! Still a little over 7 hours to get your 120% LISK  / 30% bonus in! How much LISK / BTC will be exchanged after first 24h ?
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 515
Why is it that yesterday it was on 46% with 460.000 usd, and now it is at 39% with 551.000 usd?

That progress bar (which is a threshold to start the project) was set at 1m USD so we corrected and changed to 2000 BTC equivalent in USD (which is around 1.4 m now) to start the project.

I find this incredibly sneaky.

I've just started looking at the project and thought it may be neat for the value. Albeit with no real innovations that I can see.

I mean from the website "ARK's Core is configured to produce ultra fast transaction speeds approaching 200 transactions per minute. With scaling, higher throughput is possible"

What kind of a special assertion is that.. So 3.3 transactions per second is impressive.. More ironic given the emphasis everywhere on consumer adoption. Visa handles 2000 transactions per second on average.

Anyway I understand the jack of all trades thing and what you're trying to do. That's why I think it's neat.

Going back to my original issue though..

You raised the threshold from $1 million (what it was set at in BTC equivalent) to $1.4 million. Stating the increase in BTC price was the reason. You can still accomplish the same in fiat. There's no reason to raise it. If it went down in value you probably wouldn't be lowering it would you?

The threshold is supposed to be the minimum amount you can do the work for. Not as an opportunity for you to raise extra funds.

I've now got to think about investing after that.

I agree with MrM.

Minimum was always set at 2000 BTC read the OP which is currently ~1.4m
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 6194
Meh.
Why is it that yesterday it was on 46% with 460.000 usd, and now it is at 39% with 551.000 usd?

That progress bar (which is a threshold to start the project) was set at 1m USD so we corrected and changed to 2000 BTC equivalent in USD (which is around 1.4 m now) to start the project.

I find this incredibly sneaky.

I've just started looking at the project and thought it may be neat for the value. Albeit with no real innovations that I can see.

I mean from the website "ARK's Core is configured to produce ultra fast transaction speeds approaching 200 transactions per minute. With scaling, higher throughput is possible"

What kind of a special assertion is that.. So 3.3 transactions per second is impressive.. More ironic given the emphasis everywhere on consumer adoption. Visa handles 2000 transactions per second on average.

Anyway I understand the jack of all trades thing and what you're trying to do. That's why I think it's neat.

Going back to my original issue though..

You raised the threshold from $1 million (what it was set at in BTC equivalent) to $1.4 million. Stating the increase in BTC price was the reason. You can still accomplish the same in fiat. There's no reason to raise it. If it went down in value you probably wouldn't be lowering it would you?

The threshold is supposed to be the minimum amount you can do the work for. Not as an opportunity for you to raise extra funds.

I've now got to think about investing after that.

I agree with MrM.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
-
You raised the threshold from $1 million (what it was set at in BTC equivalent) to $1.4 million. Stating the increase in BTC price was the reason.

one of the devs put the wrong starting valuation in the code.  It should have been 2000 BTC which is roughly 1.5 million but was set at 1 million.
hero member
Activity: 722
Merit: 500
Why is it that yesterday it was on 46% with 460.000 usd, and now it is at 39% with 551.000 usd?

That progress bar (which is a threshold to start the project) was set at 1m USD so we corrected and changed to 2000 BTC equivalent in USD (which is around 1.4 m now) to start the project.

I find this incredibly sneaky.

I've just started looking at the project and thought it may be neat for the value. Albeit with no major innovations that I can see.

I mean from the website "ARK's Core is configured to produce ultra fast transaction speeds approaching 200 transactions per minute. With scaling, higher throughput is possible"

What kind of a special assertion is that.. So 3.3 transactions per second is impressive.. More ironic given the emphasis everywhere on consumer adoption. Visa handles 2000 transactions per second on average.


Anyway I understand the jack of all trades thing and what you're trying to do. That's why I think it's neat.

Going back to my original issue though..

You raised the threshold from $1 million (what it was set at in BTC equivalent) to $1.4 million. Stating the increase in BTC price was the reason. You can still accomplish the same in fiat. There's no reason to raise it. If it went down in value you probably wouldn't be lowering it would you?

The threshold is supposed to be the minimum amount you can do the work for. Not as an opportunity for you to raise extra funds.

I've now got to think about investing after that.
Jump to: