Pages:
Author

Topic: ASICMINER AUCTION 2000 sahres. - page 11. (Read 16287 times)

vip
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
February 17, 2013, 10:22:37 PM
#43
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
February 17, 2013, 08:55:58 PM
#42
People aren't investing for the 12 TH/s they have now.  That would be like me claiming people investing in your mining company are investing for the ZERO TH/s you have now.

Ha, touché Wink

The investment is for the long-term value.  Where I disagree with you (and I KNOW we disagree - as you wouldn't have started your company if you agreed) is that I believe in the medium to long-term only companies with a significant edge of some kind will be able to make a profit from BTC mining.   That's because the barrier to entry to mining is so low that all the time it's profitable to do, more people will keep getting in.  And even when it becomes unprofitable more will STILL come in - those doing it for fun, those with an inability to do math and those running mining companies who take a cut of revenue and pass the losses on to investors.

Manufacturing your own ASICs is about the biggest such edge possible - when hardware costs 10% of what it costs competitors you have a massive advantage.  Add to that Chinese power/labour costs and you have a company that there's just no way the likes of you can compete against - they can mine profitably long after you're making a loss.

I think the majority of the valuation comes from the fact that profits (and dividends along with it) are going to enormous until both Avalon and BFL kick it into gear, combined with the long term prospects (assuming ASICMiner continues to develop more advanced hardware as the years go on).

That said, I still agree with you on pretty much all the points made..and I, personally, value long term investments quite a bit more. But I do know most Bitcoin investors tend to have a short attention span, which is why I kept my company's mining fund more on the medium term Cheesy ..the security that starts after the bond holders are paid back is the long term part of my company Wink

Anyway, I digressed. TL;DR - I see the points made, and although I agree that they add value I am still wary about the price tag for such a valuation.

Thanks for laying it out there, Deprived Smiley
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
February 17, 2013, 08:18:28 PM
#41
Right, I understand that...but that's surely not the only aspect going into this evaluation?

At 12TH/s (their starting projection before ramping up to 50TH/s or more), it's 30MH/s per share (400,000 shares). These 2000 shares up for offer are worth 60GH/s...in August 2012 (at IPO price of .1BTC), it was worth 200BTC, or $2,000 (at roughly $10 per BTC back then).

So now you're telling me that 6 months of risk (and BTC rallying) has resulted in $2,000 in shares suddenly becoming worth $20,500? [2000 shares x .38BTC minimum valuation x $27 USD/BTC]
Even at 50TH/s, it's only 125MH/s per share...2000 of which would result in 250GH/s. In my mind, I simply can't justify how that could be worth a minimum of 760 Bitcoins, even when factoring in risk...

Clearly there's something I'm missing...or maybe people bidding for these shares haven't done their math yet?

You're missing a whole bunch of things.  Here's the most obvious:

People aren't investing for the 12 TH/s they have now.  That would be like me claiming people investing in your mining company are investing for the ZERO TH/s you have now.

The investment is for the long-term value.  Where I disagree with you (and I KNOW we disagree - as you wouldn't have started your company if you agreed) is that I believe in the medium to long-term only companies with a significant edge of some kind will be able to make a profit from BTC mining.   That's because the barrier to entry to mining is so low that all the time it's profitable to do, more people will keep getting in.  And even when it becomes unprofitable more will STILL come in - those doing it for fun, those with an inability to do math and those running mining companies who take a cut of revenue and pass the losses on to investors.

Manufacturing your own ASICs is about the biggest such edge possible - when hardware costs 10% of what it costs competitors you have a massive advantage.  Add to that Chinese power/labour costs and you have a company that there's just no way the likes of you can compete against - they can mine profitably long after you're making a loss.

Not only do investors get that mining - but also a share of profits from sales to the mathematically challenged who mine or who run mining companies selling investment to those with even less ability in math.

That's what's being sold.

Oh - and if you DO want to look at just the first 12 GH/s, do remember that the 200k BitFountain get nothing until the other shares (the type being sold here) have got back their initial 0.1 BTC.  That adds just over .05 BTC to the value alone.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
February 17, 2013, 08:01:51 PM
#40
And these aren't mining bonds but equity in a company.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
February 17, 2013, 07:57:10 PM
#39
Yes, mods can still delete posts in this section. Please use the 'report to moderators' option next time to inform us.

Ah, sounds good. Thanks John.


Well anyway, back to the original question: Goat, why are you offering them at .38 when they were originally purchased at .1? What makes these 2000 shares so special that they require a 380% markup?

My auction is still running in another thread and ASICMINER shares are currently going for 0.44BTC each, so please allow me to take the ball and answer your question.

When friedcat offered participation in his venture 6+ months ago, this was not more than a bet whether he could compete with the established players. Assume at that times you invested money in ASICMINER, BFL, Avalon and bASIC equally to diversify your risk. Today, ASICMINER won the race (ok, Avalon delivered first, but not to us mortals) and that's why you are asked to pay 300% risk surcharge - thats what you pay to someone else taking the risk for you.

Right, I understand that...but that's surely not the only aspect going into this evaluation?

At 12TH/s (their starting projection before ramping up to 50TH/s or more), it's 30MH/s per share (400,000 shares). These 2000 shares up for offer are worth 60GH/s...in August 2012 (at IPO price of .1BTC), it was worth 200BTC, or $2,000 (at roughly $10 per BTC back then).

So now you're telling me that 6 months of risk (and BTC rallying) has resulted in $2,000 in shares suddenly becoming worth $20,500? [2000 shares x .38BTC minimum valuation x $27 USD/BTC]
Even at 50TH/s, it's only 125MH/s per share...2000 of which would result in 250GH/s. In my mind, I simply can't justify how that could be worth a minimum of 760 Bitcoins, even when factoring in risk...

Clearly there's something I'm missing...or maybe people bidding for these shares haven't done their math yet?

A number of factors:

At 0.1 BTC / share, there was significant risk - development problems for example, and nobody could predict if ASICMINER will be the first to market (they are definitely beating avalon's ASIC trickle).

The BTC price rally is a null point - higher BTC worth means that mining companies will make more USD income, and vice versa.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
February 17, 2013, 07:40:35 PM
#38
Yes, mods can still delete posts in this section. Please use the 'report to moderators' option next time to inform us.

Ah, sounds good. Thanks John.


Well anyway, back to the original question: Goat, why are you offering them at .38 when they were originally purchased at .1? What makes these 2000 shares so special that they require a 380% markup?

My auction is still running in another thread and ASICMINER shares are currently going for 0.44BTC each, so please allow me to take the ball and answer your question.

When friedcat offered participation in his venture 6+ months ago, this was not more than a bet whether he could compete with the established players. Assume at that times you invested money in ASICMINER, BFL, Avalon and bASIC equally to diversify your risk. Today, ASICMINER won the race (ok, Avalon delivered first, but not to us mortals) and that's why you are asked to pay 300% risk surcharge - thats what you pay to someone else taking the risk for you.

Right, I understand that...but that's surely not the only aspect going into this evaluation?

At 12TH/s (their starting projection before ramping up to 50TH/s or more), it's 30MH/s per share (400,000 shares). These 2000 shares up for offer are worth 60GH/s...in August 2012 (at IPO price of .1BTC), it was worth 200BTC, or $2,000 (at roughly $10 per BTC back then).

So now you're telling me that 6 months of risk (and BTC rallying) has resulted in $2,000 in shares suddenly becoming worth $20,500? [2000 shares x .38BTC minimum valuation x $27 USD/BTC]
Even at 50TH/s, it's only 125MH/s per share...2000 of which would result in 250GH/s. In my mind, I simply can't justify how that could be worth a minimum of 760 Bitcoins, even when factoring in risk...

Clearly there's something I'm missing...or maybe people bidding for these shares haven't done their math yet?
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1227
Away on an extended break
February 17, 2013, 06:41:18 PM
#37
This is a  Auctions thread. You can't edit posts. And moderators can't do it too, I think...
Oh..oops, sorry for all the posts. Meant to edit my first one, but it appears the "edit" button is missing...  Undecided

Mods, feel free to delete this post and the one before it with just the quote.

Ha, yeah so I noticed Undecided


Well anyway, back to the original question: Goat, why are you offering them at .38 when they were originally purchased at .1? What makes these 2000 shares so special that they require a 380% markup?
Yes, mods can still delete posts in this section. Please use the 'report to moderators' option next time to inform us.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
bitcoin is an expression of freedom.
February 17, 2013, 06:22:26 PM
#36
You simply buying a small part of ASIC mining hardware working 24 h/7 days. (1/400 000 of ASICMiner power).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/asicminer-entering-the-future-of-asic-mining-by-inventing-it-99497

Im sorry I have no idea how this works as an investment, is anyone willing to break it down for my feeble mind?
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
February 17, 2013, 06:19:19 PM
#35
NameNumber of sharespps
PM1250.45
TradeFortress1000.41
mb300sd4000.40
Sal002250.39
wachtwoord250.39
Sukrim750.39
TradeFortress5000.39
ahdinosaur1250.38
BlackLilac 2000.38
ghostshirt 750.38
Vezunchik 2500.38
PM2 2000.38
-------OUTBID------------------------
Name           Number of sharespps
PM2 2000.38
keystroke 2500.38
Vezunchik 1500.38
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
February 17, 2013, 06:10:52 PM
#34
500 @ 0.39
100 @ 0.41
hero member
Activity: 696
Merit: 500
February 17, 2013, 05:35:23 PM
#33
Im sorry I have no idea how this works as an investment, is anyone willing to break it down for my feeble mind?
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
February 17, 2013, 04:50:51 PM
#32
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1007
February 17, 2013, 04:07:21 PM
#31
75 @ 0.39
(=29.25 total)

I think that increases of 0.01 are too high btw. considering that the starting price is just 0.38 per share and one has to buy in packs of 25 shares.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
February 17, 2013, 03:28:18 PM
#30
NameNumber of sharespps
PM1250.45
mb300sd4000.40
Sal002250.39
wachtwoord250.39
ahdinosaur1250.38
BlackLilac 2000.38
ghostshirt 750.38
Vezunchik 2500.38
PM2 4000.38
keystroke 2500.38
Vezunchik 1500.38
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
bitcoin is an expression of freedom.
February 17, 2013, 03:27:30 PM
#29
And do not forget that this means
250 @ 0.38 # 14 + 150 @ 0.38 # 30
Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
bitcoin is an expression of freedom.
February 17, 2013, 03:24:43 PM
#28
Please update my bid:
400 @ 0.38
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
February 17, 2013, 02:59:29 PM
#27
NameNumber of sharespps
PM1250.45
mb300sd4000.40
Sal002250.39
wachtwoord250.39
ahdinosaur1250.38
BlackLilac 2000.38
ghostshirt 750.38
Vezunchik 2500.38
PM2 4000.38
keystroke 2500.38
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
February 17, 2013, 02:53:05 PM
#26
25 @ 0.39
hero member
Activity: 900
Merit: 1014
advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe
February 17, 2013, 02:40:12 PM
#25
250 @ .38
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
February 17, 2013, 02:32:58 PM
#24
500 @ 0.4
Pages:
Jump to: