Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 1292. (Read 3917531 times)

Update

This is again a quick update.

We received (again) the revised version of shareholders' information from GLBSE.
The difference is that this time the whole number finally adds up. So if its data is
indeed correct, it should contain all shareholders' information, including those who
refused to share their information with the asset issuers. Therefore we will base the
shareholder data on the new version.

1) GLBSE still owes us money, but the total debt is much less than 5000BTC. As I promised before, the rest debt is restructured as: GLBSE owes me, and I owe the company. If we fail to get the rest debts back I would be responsible for paying back to the company.
2) As far as we know it's not information delay. It's because the foundry sped up in the later stage (called "bullet" in their jargon) and the last 12 layers are way different.
3) It's for fail-tolerance. The second half of the chips stayed at the stage that has 14 layers left, to allow further modifications if the first batch of chips fail to work due to design or manufacturing flaws that are fixable without re-doing the whole mask.

Hey jjiimm

On the 12th he said the wafers would be at the packaging facility in a week.

On the 19th he said they were at the packaging facility and within 2 weeks we will know if the chips turned out ok. So we will get the good/bad news by the first week in January according to this schedule.

I think it was already discussed, its a proxy for a botnet.

Right, right, you've never seen it so it doesn't exist and there's millions of others just like you. I'm done with this nonsense.


It's a sliding timescale.

Correct me if I'm wrong.. didn't he say about a week...about a week ago?

Well, <2 weeks now and we should know if we are going to be the first to run ASICs. 12 days according to friedcat's post. Exciting times!

It is yourself that "does not get it", you have absolutely no idea what goes on in China, for all you know they could be doing exactly the same as you.

MPOE-PR: you really don't get it do you.

I own a house, buying an ASIC does not give me any overhead costs storing wise. I just put the damn thing on my desk. I don't need to move to a bigger house to give it a dedicated space, I don't need an I.T. manager to run it, nor do I need to have the electricity company to come by my house to give me an extra fusebox.

Am I wrong not to assign part of my mortgage or rent or cash purchase price of my house as overhead costs to my ASIC? If I would live in a theoretical bubble I might be inclined to do so, but I live in the real world and when I buy a table I don't add any 'storage' overhead costs to the retail price because it needs to sit in my living room. That's my cost of living and it does not go up when I buy an object I put in my house.

Electricity costs are obviously a different subject as an ASIC would add to my electricity bill.

Friedcat has to physically rent a space to house 50TH worth of ASICs. If he adds another 200 TH he will probably have to move to a bigger place. Although the rent for a warehouse might be lower per sqr mt for a bigger warehouse than for a smaller one, his storage costs will never be zero, like they are for my lonely ASIC on my desk.

Same goes for setting up and running the ASIC. Friedcat and his partners are getting paid for maintaining the farm and they probably (hopefully) have taken into account any additional personnel they need, the need for high end cooling, etc, in their own business plan. Once they expand limitlessly they are going to need more and more people to run their farm, bigger space and better cooling, potentially cutting into their profits. Not to mention they might become a target to a cyber attack (because they are a high profile target), for which they have to pay a lot of money to their data centre to avert.

Again, it will be highly unlikely that my lonely ASIC on my desk will be targeted by anyone, I can open up a window to cool things down and I am more than happy to download each new version of CGMiner and install it in my spare time.

So from ASICMINER's perspective it might be at some point be more profitable to get BTC upfront by selling mining gear, thereby creating a certain ROI for their investors and themselves, than to keep expanding their own operations, while it will still profitable for their customers to run the ASICs they buy off of them.

And lastly, I don't know where you live or what sort of friends you have, but none of my friends have thrown up in my house for the last 20 odd years, neither did I have a break-in or fire. Maybe I have just been lucky

Anyway enough derailing of this thread. Friedcat is due to give us a more detailed update, so let's hear it !!!

There could be, especially on the cooling part (which is actually visible in this very forum, the reason some miners were successful where others weren't nearly as successful or at all was pretty much their ability to calculate and construct good cooling). However, GPUs scale so poorly that by the time you have a farm large enough to be buying electricity in bulk you're getting so many chip panics per hour it becomes impractical to maintain the entire thing (for exactly the reason Mr. Teal states, it's normally uneconomical to pay for the maintenance time at anything like a reasonable market rate).

Since you're discussing the pro and cons of a mining operation I think I'll throw in my recent contribution to the board. Generally economy of scale does apply - but there are other factors you need to account for, which are not directly related to economic factors. Talking about the benefits of self-mining vs. exclusively selling hardware should be obvious for all major players involved in the production of ASICs.

1) Mining operation
0.06-0.07$/kWh certainly sounds competitive on a residential level. Given that the long-term plan incorporates a sustained mining operation, the option to take advantage of excess power is attractive. Power at peak hours tends to be more expensive, than power during low demand. This special contract may give you an edge over other miners - especially since mining is an opportunistic activity. That means that you need to cycle your mining operation depending on the power rates which unfortunately reduces your average hashing capacity per chip.
That said, at the current price/difficulty ratio I don't think power bills are the limiting factor. You'd need to throw anything you got at the network until the profit margin hits 10% (generated BTC - power costs). Thus power costs may be an issue in a year from now, when all GPU miners are driven out.

As with the target size of the mining operation I am not convinced a huge mining operation is beneficial in the long run (short term yes), because the bigger the mining operation the larger the overhead costs (area, cooling, staff) and you also make yourself a target for cyber attacks. Also, the bigger the mining operation, the more you cut into the remaining profit margin of your potential customers, forcing you do reduce the selling price of your hardware. A model where you mainly act as a supplier of a few larger mining operations or retailers is more reasonable. For that you'd need to work on customer relationships with these operators and maybe provide some volume discounts and premium support.

In any event, I still think a small mining operation is key to design optimization and gives you an edge in any further development of your chips, because it shows you potential bottlenecks in overall performance.

Certainly there have to be economies of scale for GPUs when it comes to buying electricity in bulk and cooling them in bulk.

Idiot forum posters....lol....who write without thinking at all....lol....basing themselves on unexamined consensus of idiots....lol....as if that makes it reality.....lol....and claim those who think don't because they come to different results....lol.

You *thinking* the food you eat off the hands of your parents and the roof you use through the good offices of the same parents (who quite possibly in turn leech it off some welfare state or other) is free does not make it so. Random joe blow "miner"'s inability to account for his costs correctly does not make those costs zero.

Simple scenario A: you get a rig, place it somewhere in your parent's house, there's a break-in, some douches trash the place. Your rig is destroyed. Total loss. Odds of this happening? Say 5% a year.

Simple scenario B: you hold a party, someone accidentally pukes/drops a full keg/whatever on your rig. Rig is ruined. Total loss. Odds of this happening? Say 10% a year.

Simple scenario etC: there's a fire. Rig is destroyed. Total loss. Odds of this happening? Say 3% a year.

Yes, I know that events which you haven't personally witnessed can never happen, this is why you can never get a girlfriend, cause it's never happened to you in the past and consequently it will never happen to you in the future. Nevertheless, your costs, your costs are 18% a year in those examples whether you like it or not, whether you agree with them being that or not, whether you know about it or not.

Someone hosting a million of the damned things can reduce costs under 1%, and likely under 0.01% and beat you out of the market predictably enough. It won't happen in practice because you'll beat yourself out of the market first (for instance by getting a girlfriend, or by talking forum shit to someone irl and getting pounded into a pulp, or through whatever other means). But just because you're too stupid & irrelevant to matter in the discussion does not mean the invisible hand ain't there.


You are happily confusing the thing itself with one bad implementation thereof. The logical equivalent of your post is "Oh, computers my ass! I bought a Microsoft one once and within the week it kept opening flashing tabs all the time."


In fact "business plans" which confuse opportunity with leeching are the best predictors of "business" failure. Review the forum, we have ~50 or so documented cases of failure, you'll be amazed.


Exactly so.


The argument was not brought about GPUs specifically because it does not work for GPUs, so nice red herring you got going there. Are you aware, by the way, and doing this deliberately, or does your brain just not know how to work properly? Honest question.

ASICs are economy of scale manifesting itself in the mining market. They're purpose-designed GPUs practically speaking.

Let's forget about ASICs for a moment, and consider off-the-shelf GPUs or FPGAs. What is the advantage of a high-volume minjng business in my city over my own in-house mining op, per dollar invested?  I build a $1300 rig and mine, versus investing the same amount in a mining company. The owner takes their cut. Where is the advantage in larger scale?
Moving on to ASICs, there is the issue of NRE cost. Clearly, a big business can invest and achieve better efficiency. A hobbist cannot even develop their own ASIC - unless we incorporate (in the old sense of the word - pool resources together to achieve something big, like building a city or a bridge). Now we can all grow our tomatoes and mine our coins and live happily. There is no reason to go big. Distributed, p2p, in numeris vires. 

There's a difference between economies of scale and efficiencies, and your personal hobbies. You enjoy growing tomatoes, and DutchBrat enjoys running mining hardware. That's great. That's on your own personal time though, not your "productive", "working" time.
Now, if you were to start growing potatos, then cabbage, and all your other vegetables in your spare time, and started taking time off work to go deer hunting, would that be an efficient use of resources?

If you like gardening and grow tomatoes on your own instead of buying them in the store, it's not that economies of scale don't apply to that market. It just means that you're willing to sacrifice your personal time to grow your own tomatoes less efficiently than a specialized producer could. It's the same with mining hardware. I would posit that the majority of people here lose money on mining and bitcoin activity if you actually factor in a reasonable wage on the time. Run a 6GH/s farm in your basement right now sucking [email protected]? You might be making $3/day. Even outside the noise in the basement, you're making $21/week. Even with free hardware, most people would be better off spending an hour of overtime at work per week than spending it managing their mining hardware. People do it because they enjoy it, but that doesn't make it an efficient use of resources.

The fact that some miners ignore costs doesn't mean that those costs don't actually exist.  And I'd hardly be taking miners' words for anything to do with business.  I've never heard a miner say that their mining investment opportunity would lose money for investors.  Does that mean they've all been profitable?  Or even that most have?

There may well be some miners who get "free" power and "free" rent who could fit in 1 rig but not 10.  But there'll be others who could fit 10 in on the same basis.

"free" is in quotes because of course the power and rent isn't actually free - SOMEONE is paying for it.  And I'm not a huge fan of "business plans" (in quotes as most around here aren't plans and have little to do with business) that include assuming power and rent are "free" - as those plans run into a heap of trouble if down the road they turn out no longer to be "free".

I grow tomatoes on my patio, they taste great. The 19th-century "economies of scale" logic would mandate me and everyone else quitting this nonsense, so a huge greenhouses can be built thousands of miles away using loans from international banks, with patented, genetically engineered tomatoes that can survive trucking and customs clearance, and a a network of supermarkets that we all drive to in SUVs whenever we need a tomato or two, and an army and a cemetary to ensure cheap oil for the whole operation. Economies of scale, my ass.

Lol, you always make me laugh when you write before you think!

I have never heard a miner say there is cost involved in giving one ASIC or any other mining device a roof over its head. Try to get free rent when you have to give 1 million mining devices a dry place to stay....

Economies of scale.... lol.....

It depends when you start selling. Of course buyers should calculate before. The thing is that other vendors will sell Asics anyway, so at some point it will make more sense for Asicminer to sell Asics then to mine with them. For example if Asiminer has to mine 6 months to get the creationprice back in and a buyer has to work 12months with such asic it would still be a good product to sell. I mean what investment brings 100% return per year? But at that point it could make more sense to Asicminer selling many Asics because the short gain is better than wait months for the same effect. And obviously friedcat and team already took that into account when creating the business plan.
Plus they plan to develop newer and better asics depending how the first one works. So it sounds to me they want to have a name as a vendor for Asics at some time. At least friedcat wrote this way like they want to create newer, better versions to sell them and that this will be the way the company will move to in future. But of course at the start mining themselves will be far better.

How have you come to this nonsense?

Read up on economy of scale. Anything that can be done in onesies can be done in millionsies for less money. Anything.

...with Christmas colors! Don't forget to mention the Christmas colors!