ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 337.

minerpumpkin

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

A pumpkin mines 27 hours a night

Quote from: Franktank on June 01, 2014, 04:39:17 PM

I was merely providing a possible explanation as to what the "Materials" asset could consist of and where the May funds could've gone. It's well understood AM has been partnering with Allied Control to establish hardware and immersion cooling for potential franchisees, these are the most recent updates that I found. Now it's just waiting to see how it turns out, for better or worse.

The May dividends pretty much exactly fund the June batch.

Franktank

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: dexX7 on June 01, 2014, 03:34:30 PM

Quote from: Franktank on June 01, 2014, 02:07:28 PM

And now Containers:

https://drive.google.com/?authuser=0#folders/0ByWHHc0u_thNLU1wTWd5ZGYxVEE

What is the context of this folder? How is this related to AM?

Edit: to be clear, I'm well aware of DataTank and so on, but I'm unsure about those stock photos and schematics of some containers.

For the reference, DataTank:

http://www.allied-control.com/datatank
http://www.allied-control.com/publications/DataTank_Product_Info.pdf
http://www.allied-control.com/publications/DataTank_Press_Release.pdf

I was merely providing a possible explanation as to what the "Materials" asset could consist of and where the May funds could've gone. It's well understood AM has been partnering with Allied Control to establish hardware and immersion cooling for potential franchisees, these are the most recent updates that I found. Now it's just waiting to see how it turns out, for better or worse.

Another User

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

Quote from: NotLambchop on June 01, 2014, 04:11:49 PM

@Another User: Context. Qualifiers. <==Learn both

And of course I don't have the entire picture. Neither do you. OTOH, when it smells like shit and it's this sewer, I'm going to assume it's shit. <==reasonable assumption

~rolly-eyed smileys~

Oooooh! My turn!

@NotLampChop "Reasonable" assumption ≠ Reality. Comprehension. <==Understand both

For someone that claims to "use logic," backing them up with only assumptions doesn't make it any more legitimate. OTOH, when you smell "shit" and you're in "this sewer," kind of makes you wonder why you're even here in the first place, doesn't it? Must be a fetish, maybe I'm just not sure...

~rolly-eyed smileys~

conspirosphere.tk

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 1064

Bitcoin is antisemitic

Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on June 01, 2014, 04:10:23 PM

Bit nerve racking

The moral of the story is: when you have a 40X+ bagger in your hands like any holders who bought at the IPO time last summer, sell the sh*t out of it without thinking twice.

NotLambchop

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 254

@Another User: Context. Qualifiers. <==Learn both

And of course I don't have the entire picture. Neither do you. OTOH, when it smells like shit and it's this sewer, I'm going to assume it's shit. <==reasonable assumption (as in "pretty sure" if you still don't get it)

~rolly-eyed smileys~

AcoinL.L.C

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

Its very plausible FC has interests elsewhere. Its a bit questionable to see how they ended the last month with a loss. This business is valued in the hundreds of millions (IMO its overpriced), and its share prices have taken a bit of a tumble recently, check out the orderbook on havelock. While some of its attributed to the recent increase of the USD value, its still losing ground regardless of that, yesterday each share was valued at ~$240, right now its at $170. Bit nerve racking considering this is by far the largest BTC business

Another User

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

Quote from: NotLambchop on June 01, 2014, 07:47:58 AM

And I'm not even suggesting that, at the time you made your 600% profit...

Quote from: NotLambchop on June 01, 2014, 10:44:47 AM

JoTheKhan, not sure if I remember you from....

Quote from: NotLambchop on June 01, 2014, 11:51:54 AM

I'm not implying that the board members were paid off... I also have no idea how many shares... I'm also not clairvoyant...

Quote from: NotLambchop on June 01, 2014, 12:09:16 PM

Not sure where I led you to believe a conspiracy was involved....

Quote from: NotLambchop on June 01, 2014, 02:36:47 PM

Not sure I get it. What does inflation have to do...

For not having the entire picture, you seem quite sure of it.

Cheesy

NotLambchop

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 254

Quote from: hdbuck on June 01, 2014, 03:20:50 PM

@electrium & lambchopfuck: plz get lost. you know nothing. JUST NOTHING. AM is risky, but as far as i see & understand everything is on track. and the best is yet to come.

edit: maybe FC owns your mama's butt via some company too. who knows..

Dat edge...

@Another User: Where do you see the contradiction?

Another User

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

Quote from: electerium on June 01, 2014, 03:12:53 PM

any company worth their salt, and as TAT plainly states, FC et. al are millionaires; so any reputable business people that operate a company that generates millions in revenue wouldn't hesitate to spend 50,000$ on documents, lawyers, and independent reviews that plainly show whatever you claim.

but we're talking about people who operate in a country that is notorious and rife with fraud in business dealings.

Quote from: electerium on June 01, 2014, 02:49:50 PM

how about this:

consider if friedcat et al. own rockminer and xtbec.

Quote from: electerium on June 01, 2014, 02:40:50 PM

come on, you're smart. I dont have to spell it out.

Consider any landscape where FC et al. want to wash themselves of AM's shareholders.

Quote from: electerium on June 01, 2014, 03:06:58 PM

I have no proof either way.

dexX7

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1026

Quote from: Franktank on June 01, 2014, 02:07:28 PM

And now Containers:

https://drive.google.com/?authuser=0#folders/0ByWHHc0u_thNLU1wTWd5ZGYxVEE

What is the context of this folder? How is this related to AM?

Edit: to be clear, I'm well aware of DataTank and so on, but I'm unsure about those stock photos and schematics of some containers.

For the reference, DataTank:

http://www.allied-control.com/datatank
http://www.allied-control.com/publications/DataTank_Product_Info.pdf
http://www.allied-control.com/publications/DataTank_Press_Release.pdf

lophie

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1001

Unlimited Free Crypto

Quote from: Another User on June 01, 2014, 03:28:46 PM

Quote from: NotLambchop on June 01, 2014, 11:51:54 AM

And that's all I'm saying here--not understanding how a scam works is not proof of it not being a scam. Everything beyond that was thrust onto me by ASICMINER fanbois and jittery "investors." To be clearer still, I never called this a scam--merely pointed out that the odds of losing on this are astoundingly high. Not only due to FC, but to a slew of third-party risks--exchanges, etc. The potential upside in no way compensates for this, making this a nonstarter as an investment.

Hope this is a bit clearer.

Quote from: NotLambchop on June 01, 2014, 07:47:58 AM

And I'm not even suggesting that, at the time you made your 600% profit, ASICMINER was setting out to be a scam.
Times were different back then, getting ripped off was still not a certainty and scamming far from a de facto business plan for bitcoin securities.
But time means flux, and today it pretty much is.

Doesn't count. that was Mr. Hyde

Another User

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

Quote from: NotLambchop on June 01, 2014, 11:51:54 AM

And that's all I'm saying here--not understanding how a scam works is not proof of it not being a scam. Everything beyond that was thrust onto me by ASICMINER fanbois and jittery "investors." To be clearer still, I never called this a scam--merely pointed out that the odds of losing on this are astoundingly high. Not only due to FC, but to a slew of third-party risks--exchanges, etc. The potential upside in no way compensates for this, making this a nonstarter as an investment.

Hope this is a bit clearer.

Quote from: NotLambchop on June 01, 2014, 07:47:58 AM

And I'm not even suggesting that, at the time you made your 600% profit, ASICMINER was setting out to be a scam.
Times were different back then, getting ripped off was still not a certainty and scamming far from a de facto business plan for bitcoin securities.
But time means flux, and today it pretty much is.

jimmothy

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 509

Quote from: electerium on June 01, 2014, 03:12:53 PM

any company worth their salt, and as TAT plainly states, FC et. al are millionaires; so any reputable business people that operate a company that generates millions in revenue wouldn't hesitate to spend 50,000$ on documents, lawyers, and independent reviews that plainly show whatever you claim.

but we're talking about people who operate in a country that is notorious and rife with fraud in business dealings.

The only thing Ive seen TAT plainly acknowledge is that he has no idea what he is talking about.

It is absurd to think AM needs to publicly release documents with identities, verified by lawyers and independent auditors for every business partner. That is not the 'merican way of doing business.

Until there is a single shred of evidence to suggest this conspiracy theory is remotely possible, we should stop entertaining the idea.

Mabsark

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

Quote from: electerium on June 01, 2014, 03:06:58 PM

Quote from: jimmothy on June 01, 2014, 03:01:54 PM

Quote from: electerium on June 01, 2014, 02:54:41 PM

Quote

First of all that is simply not true and can be proven to be false.

Second, why would it matter? If AM is selling chips why should we care who is buying them?

Do you really think FC owns any of the known 4 companies manufacturing hardware using AM chips?

if you think it doesnt matter you are the dumbest person on these forums, and that is saying a lot.

Ok it does matter I misspoke.

Still do you really think FC owns any of the 4 companies?

This is an extremely risky and not so rewarding conspiracy you are suggesting.

I have no proof either way.

But the last few months have raised enough questions that this needs to be explicitly addressed in a manner that involves official statements by many people not acting under a pseudonym that can be examined by some independent group of people. but that's the american way of dealing business. and i would be shocked if that would happen here.

And how exactly is FriedCat meant to prove that he doesn't own some company? Perhaps he'll do that right after you prove that God does not exist.

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

@electrium & lambchopfuck: plz get lost. you know nothing. AM is risky, but as far as i see & understand everything is on track. and the best is yet to come.

edit: maybe FC owns your mama's butt via some company too. who knows..

Chris_Sabian

legendary

Activity: 896

Merit: 1001

Quote from: jdany on June 01, 2014, 11:31:29 AM

I'm not terribly excited about what happened here over the last few days.
Based on a few of the balance sheet assessments, I tend to agree that AM is setup pretty well over the next few quarters.

However, I do see a time where investors become too much of a pain in the ass - and totally unnecessary.
It would be better to buy them out, and become more private/

If it were me and I wanted to kill off investors.
I would cut off dividends. Shut them out for awhile. Let them panic. Let the value tumble. Buy back their shares. And carry on.

No conspiracy. But, we have become a really big group of whiny bitches. (myself included)
Regardless if it's warranted or not - I wouldn't want to put up with us.

This is actually a good but ethically questionable idea

Another User

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

Quote from: electerium on June 01, 2014, 03:06:58 PM

But the last few months have raised enough questions that this needs to be explicitly addressed in a manner that involves official statements by many people not acting under a pseudonym that can be examined by some independent group of people. but that's the american way of dealing business. and i would be shocked if that would happen here.

Quote from: electerium on June 01, 2014, 03:12:53 PM

any company worth their salt, and as TAT plainly states, FC et. al are millionaires; so any reputable business people that operate a company that generates millions in revenue wouldn't hesitate to spend 50,000$ on documents, lawyers, and independent reviews that plainly show whatever you claim.

but we're talking about people who operate in a country that is notorious and rife with fraud in business dealings.

Careful, your jingoism is showing!! Cheesy

vortex1878

hero member

Activity: 491

Merit: 500

Quote from: electerium on June 01, 2014, 03:12:53 PM

any company worth their salt, and as TAT plainly states, FC et. al are millionaires; so any reputable business people that operate a company that generates millions in revenue wouldn't hesitate to spend 50,000$ on documents, lawyers, and independent reviews that plainly show whatever you claim.

but we're talking about people who operate in a country that is notorious and rife with fraud in business dealings.

I just waited for that last pathetic card to be played. Game over. Go try better elsewhere.

electerium

full member

Activity: 179

Merit: 100

any company worth their salt, and as TAT plainly states, FC et. al are millionaires; so any reputable business people that operate a company that generates millions in revenue wouldn't hesitate to spend 50,000$ on documents, lawyers, and independent reviews that plainly show whatever you claim.

but we're talking about people who operate in a country that is notorious and rife with fraud in business dealings.

electerium

full member

Activity: 179

Merit: 100

Quote from: jimmothy on June 01, 2014, 03:01:54 PM

Quote from: electerium on June 01, 2014, 02:54:41 PM

Quote

First of all that is simply not true and can be proven to be false.

Second, why would it matter? If AM is selling chips why should we care who is buying them?

Do you really think FC owns any of the known 4 companies manufacturing hardware using AM chips?

if you think it doesnt matter you are the dumbest person on these forums, and that is saying a lot.

Ok it does matter I misspoke.

Still do you really think FC owns any of the 4 companies?

This is an extremely risky and not so rewarding conspiracy you are suggesting.

I have no proof either way.

But the last few months have raised enough questions that this needs to be explicitly addressed in a manner that involves official statements by many people not acting under a pseudonym that can be examined by some independent group of people. but that's the american way of dealing business. and i would be shocked if that would happen here.

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 337. (Read 3917468 times)