...
Wouldn't the board have said something if the person they were meeting with had changed/the company was sold? ...
Wouldn't the board have said something if the person they were meeting with had changed/the company was sold? ...
If it was in the board's best interest, yes.
Well we haven't seen board members unload shares, if they are privy to information this catastrophic, then wouldn't they have tried to unload shares before the everyman would have found out? Maybe I missed it.
JoTheKhan, not sure if I remember you from Active Mining or Ukyo threads, could you remind me? I remember similarly heavy logic being dropped in both.
Not the Ukyo thread, definitely the Active M. Thread. My logic in Active Mining thread has pretty much been that dividends won't exist by the very definition of what a dividend was. Since the company has and will continue along in the Red until it folds or pigs fly. I believe we had a very nice conversation about this until it was deleted. =/
Edit: Please enlighten me on how this specific scam works though. I don't think I am being roped in on scams, as I am Up in AsicMiner at the moment, didn't get caught in Mt. Gox, Labcoin ( I actually made some money flipping the IPO shares since it was so obvious about the pumping, I actually feel guilty about this ), skipped Neobee, didn't keep money on WeX or BF, or any of the other stuff.
Active Mining being the only big red blot on my history, 100% fault of my own.
I always look forward to your advice. =)
I guess there is an assumption that the board members were paid off to not say anything about the company being bought or some other nefarious event?
