Hey I just had a thought. Would it be reasonable for ASICMiner to share a projected dividends outlook for two to three months? Just a ballpark estimate of course, and with the understanding that no one can predict the future, etc.
I think there's some unnecessary shareholder anxiety caused merely by ASICMiner's strategy/financing being unclear. For example, Jutural mentioned that ASICMiner paid no dividends for the first 7 months. That is a great example of a period of time where having 0 dividends was not a problem, because shareholders more-or-less expected it. Similarly, if Friedcat and co. think that over the next three months the dividends are going to:
a) steadily decrease
b) hover at around 0.005/share
c) stay at zero
that's all perfectly fine with me... if that's more-or-less the plan. I don't think it would be giving away any secrets to the competition to share dividend projections would it? What do you guys think?
I like your line of thinking, however, no miner has the ability to predict mining proceeds three months out, as mining profitability has four main inputs:
1) One's own effective hashrate
2) Hashrate of the network
3) Price of bitcoin
4) Price of overhead/electricity
Arguably #2 and #3 have historically been very pretty difficult to predict, so any predictions would be nothing better than guesses.
Friedcat could share their own predicted hashrate over the next three months, and their costs, but my sense is that information would be too valuable to the competition to make public, and wouldn't really help shareholders as much as you might hope.
-helixone
I was afraid you (or someone) would say that.
Look, the point is not to accurately predict the future. No one can do that. Furthermore, I don't want Friedcat to share hashrate predictions or other
details such as cost, etc. A
ballpark dividend projection is essentially a restatement of the expected business plan under nominal conditions - of course the real conditions might be different.
Let's not over think this. There's nothing complicated about knowing that the dividends were going to be zero for the first 4-8 months after the company formed. Similarly, if ASICMiner is planning to heavily reinvest in infrastructure over the next few months, there may be negligible dividends in that period independent of unpredictable competition. Conversely, if ASICMiner is planning a major hardware sales push (or ramping up of self-mining), I would just tell shareholders that dividends are expected to be stable (and hope to pleasantly surprise them).
I don't know if what I am saying is at all reasonable. I've started a tech company before, but it was privately held and we never paid dividends