Author

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 980. (Read 3917058 times)

member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
The sheep who walks through walls.
Perhaps, because the very sensitive nature of this issue, actual security measures are best kept hidden from the public. Still, some reassurance on the matter surely can't hurt Wink

+1. We should make sure they know that this is a high priority issue for us, but for many reasons it's probably best if the actual details of security measures aren't broadcast. If friedcat assures us it's a high priority and they have taken serious measures both to defend themselves and made it so it would be strongly against the best interests of potential attackers to do so, that's good enough for me.

+1.  My thoughts exactly.

I'd like to +2 that sentiment.
legendary
Activity: 4326
Merit: 8899
'The right to privacy matters'
Also, why is anyone selling shares under 3BTC? i just can't grasp it.

Because they watched BTC fall from $290 to $100 several weeks ago, and don't want to get caught holding the bag again.

BTC/USD has never been that high, it was $256, for a moment, 2 months ago.

Consider my statement suitably modified. People are selling because they think the price will fall.
Or like myself they have taken profit and are watching.  

   I sold off at about 2.49btc but it was worth 123 usd per btc.  quick math I sold at 306 usd a share. AM is now 2.9 btc but a btc is 100usd so a share is now 290 usd.   If I buy some btc today via coin base  and grab 10 shares I save about 160 usd in price. Here in the USA coins have been squeezed tight to cash into dollars.  A few months ago when I wanted to cash a coin. I had 4 easy choices now coin base is all i have and it takes more then a few days to cash out. Since I keep this at a lower value on purpose > I never  want to have more then 5000 usd at risk cashing out my AM seemed best.
  

    I have 824 usd at risk with bfl.  715 at risk with cloud hashing.com  360 at risk with a group buy of a 110gh bit fury. that is about 1600 usd.  I have about 10 coins  sitting another 1000 usd =  a total of 2600 usd that can go poof. my gpu farm slowly decreases in value maybe  i get 3000 usd if i part it out on ebay.

 My peak with AM was 17 shares at 2.49 btc per share or  about 5200 usd  it was just too many eggs in one basket. I do not know if there are 2 or 3 or 4 mining locations . Worse case there is only one.  Fires happen , floods happen just ask western digital , earthquakes, revolutions.  So for now I can sit and wait  while collecting the last few coins with my gpu farm. Piece it out on ebay.  Use that cash to go for AM if I choose. If BFL pans out cool If cloud hashing pans out good if the group buy is a winner great. If they all lose I am still ahead. If my 10 coins turn to 0 usd I am still ahead.
I did the math and saw a  window to be ahead no matter what. I took it.  I still have action and in a month If I like what I see I can bust a move. Or fully bail out still ahead.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
Every couple of hours I've been refreshing BitFunder and watching my portfolio jump up and down. The artificial 2.5 BTC/share wall was nice for stability. Rollercoaster time I suppose.

Less of a rollercoaster but a lot more of a stable rise than if there was not such a strong support wall for a long time Smiley
If that's any consolation
hero member
Activity: 697
Merit: 500
Every couple of hours I've been refreshing BitFunder and watching my portfolio jump up and down. The artificial 2.5 BTC/share wall was nice for stability. Rollercoaster time I suppose.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Almost BTC3. Incredible

Wish I had bought in earlier!

I will feel a lot better once it crosses that 3.  I bought in from 2.71 up to 2.94.  Psychological barriers and whatnot.
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 11
I tried myself to create a list with AM shareholders based on yesterday's dividends:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtqphFCP56ordGVCakJxSU90MlB4MlBkZENya25pS2c

I got > 398k of the 400k shares. If you find any errors please let me know!


Updated by dividend day 2013-06-12

Why does it say DeaDTerra PT has 12,876 shares when in reality there are 18,845 shares listed on BitFunder?
sr. member
Activity: 302
Merit: 250
Almost BTC3. Incredible

Wish I had bought in earlier!
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Perhaps, because the very sensitive nature of this issue, actual security measures are best kept hidden from the public. Still, some reassurance on the matter surely can't hurt Wink

+1. We should make sure they know that this is a high priority issue for us, but for many reasons it's probably best if the actual details of security measures aren't broadcast. If friedcat assures us it's a high priority and they have taken serious measures both to defend themselves and made it so it would be strongly against the best interests of potential attackers to do so, that's good enough for me.

+1.  My thoughts exactly.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Perhaps, because the very sensitive nature of this issue, actual security measures are best kept hidden from the public. Still, some reassurance on the matter surely can't hurt Wink

+1. We should make sure they know that this is a high priority issue for us, but for many reasons it's probably best if the actual details of security measures aren't broadcast. If friedcat assures us it's a high priority and they have taken serious measures both to defend themselves and made it so it would be strongly against the best interests of potential attackers to do so, that's good enough for me.
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
I hope the facilties are being taken care of by a good security team. Not to be a tinfoilhatter but the more success you have, the more enemies you make. Certain people would be very happy now if the AsicMiner hashing farm were to *accidentally* blow up.


This is not a bad question. In my head the two ASICMINERs datacenters are patrolled by PLA super-troopers, but we really have no idea. Obviously the team behind ASICMINER is more than component, so I'm sure they have thought long and hard about security, and have solid ways of protecing wallets. If everything were operating from a typical office/ datacenter, a bunch of guys with guns could take it over and steal the coins the day before dividends are sent... it would be a not-too-small fortune. At this point I am so impressed with and confident in ASICMINER/Bitfountain/friedcat, I'm sure that they they have a setup/plan for the wallets so that even the Triads have no chance of getting the jump on them.
I nominate a query regarding physical security of the current mining datacenters for the next shareholder question poll.

China does not allow people to owns a gun, mate you hypothesis only working on USA..of course there are still a possibility to getting a gun, but in fact, I think Friedcat does very well on security, so far, I did not see anyone knows who is friedcat ....I also think that people will buy a gun to do a robing may not understand what is bitcoin...

It doesn't matter. Someone with enough money and interest can hire ten thugs and one bitcoin-savvy IT guy and storm the datacenters. They don't even have to rob the bitcoins. Destroying future AM ability to remain a significant player is more than enough to disrupt the market. I'm 100% sure that Friedcat and co. have thought about the possibilty of sabotage and other unfair corporate practices.

Perhaps, because the very sensitive nature of this issue, actual security measures are best kept hidden from the public. Still, some reassurance on the matter surely can't hurt Wink
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 2178
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
However I think that the question of the market cap of an enterprise / operation is inherently different in an inflationary system (ie. USD) then in a deflationary market (ie. Bitcoin). For example a sum of TWO TRILLION DOLLAR (cue Dr. Evil) is more USD than exist today, but might very well exist in 50 years and therefore be at least hypothetically transferred. A sum of 30 MILLION BITCOINS however, will always remain a fantasy. Therefore these market caps have to be viewed differently. Just my two dutch tulips.
I see what you're getting at now - I think we still disagree not on a fundamental level but on an application of value level, and that's OK. Smiley

Glad I could clear things up and not cause additional confusion about what I'm trying to say Wink
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
I hope the facilties are being taken care of by a good security team. Not to be a tinfoilhatter but the more success you have, the more enemies you make. Certain people would be very happy now if the AsicMiner hashing farm were to *accidentally* blow up.


This is not a bad question. In my head the two ASICMINERs datacenters are patrolled by PLA super-troopers, but we really have no idea. Obviously the team behind ASICMINER is more than component, so I'm sure they have thought long and hard about security, and have solid ways of protecing wallets. If everything were operating from a typical office/ datacenter, a bunch of guys with guns could take it over and steal the coins the day before dividends are sent... it would be a not-too-small fortune. At this point I am so impressed with and confident in ASICMINER/Bitfountain/friedcat, I'm sure that they they have a setup/plan for the wallets so that even the Triads have no chance of getting the jump on them.
I nominate a query regarding physical security of the current mining datacenters for the next shareholder question poll.

I nominate a query about mining a small amount on p2pool in order to keep it finding at least a block a day.  In fact, with p2pool, if they are able to mine more efficient than the average, they can potentially earn more than solo mining.  However, pointing all the hash power at p2pool would make it too hard for anyone else to find shares.  However, I am currently working on proxy software that can track shares and submit shares from multiple users to p2pool under the same address.  The payouts can then be made to the individual users once the coins mature.  Once this is ready, I'm hoping we can get a few pools set up and then p2pool should be able to remain useful for smaller miners at much higher total hashrates.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
I hope the facilties are being taken care of by a good security team. Not to be a tinfoilhatter but the more success you have, the more enemies you make. Certain people would be very happy now if the AsicMiner hashing farm were to *accidentally* blow up.


This is not a bad question. In my head the two ASICMINERs datacenters are patrolled by PLA super-troopers, but we really have no idea. Obviously the team behind ASICMINER is more than component, so I'm sure they have thought long and hard about security, and have solid ways of protecing wallets. If everything were operating from a typical office/ datacenter, a bunch of guys with guns could take it over and steal the coins the day before dividends are sent... it would be a not-too-small fortune. At this point I am so impressed with and confident in ASICMINER/Bitfountain/friedcat, I'm sure that they they have a setup/plan for the wallets so that even the Triads have no chance of getting the jump on them.
I nominate a query regarding physical security of the current mining datacenters for the next shareholder question poll.

China does not allow people to owns a gun, mate you hypothesis only working on USA..of course there are still a possibility to getting a gun, but in fact, I think Friedcat does very well on security, so far, I did not see anyone knows who is friedcat ....I also think that people will buy a gun to do a robing may not understand what is bitcoin...
sr. member
Activity: 287
Merit: 250
I hope the facilties are being taken care of by a good security team. Not to be a tinfoilhatter but the more success you have, the more enemies you make. Certain people would be very happy now if the AsicMiner hashing farm were to *accidentally* blow up.


This is not a bad question. In my head the two ASICMINERs datacenters are patrolled by PLA super-troopers, but we really have no idea. Obviously the team behind ASICMINER is more than component, so I'm sure they have thought long and hard about security, and have solid ways of protecing wallets. If everything were operating from a typical office/ datacenter, a bunch of guys with guns could take it over and steal the coins the day before dividends are sent... it would be a not-too-small fortune. At this point I am so impressed with and confident in ASICMINER/Bitfountain/friedcat, I'm sure that they they have a setup/plan for the wallets so that even the Triads have no chance of getting the jump on them.
I nominate a query regarding physical security of the current mining datacenters for the next shareholder question poll.
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 255
I wasn't talking about gold/silver/etc though, but USD. What other use has the Dollar other than trading? Wink
Exactly my point, actually... there are hard assets, and there are assets made out of thin air. Fiat and bitcoin are similar in that they have no hard value beyond their use in trade (commerce). Gold, on the other hand, has an intrinsic value that can be denominated in fiat, but even without fiat, it has actual value to commerce in that it can be consumed for actual physical needs (like wiring for electronics, optic filters, jewelry, etc.)

Quote
However I think that the question of the market cap of an enterprise / operation is inherently different in an inflationary system (ie. USD) then in a deflationary market (ie. Bitcoin). For example a sum of TWO TRILLION DOLLAR (cue Dr. Evil) is more USD than exist today, but might very well exist in 50 years and therefore be at least hypothetically transferred. A sum of 30 MILLION BITCOINS however, will always remain a fantasy. Therefore these market caps have to be viewed differently. Just my two dutch tulips.
I see what you're getting at now - I think we still disagree not on a fundamental level but on an application of value level, and that's OK. Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 255

Um... bitcoin is the very definition of value out of thin air. It can't be used for ANYTHING else other than trade.
FALSE!

It can be used for lots of things beside trade. Validating the creation date of a piece of software by inserting a hash into the blockchain for example. Or auditing. Or many other uses.

http://www.whyisntbitcoinworthless.com/
No, that's the use of a block in the blockchain, which can be (but is not required to be) paid for with bitcoin via transaction fees - it's not a use of a bitcoin itself. And I didn't say that it was worthless, I said that (stating another way for clarity) it has no inherent value outside of the value that can be used in trade.
sr. member
Activity: 310
Merit: 250

Um... bitcoin is the very definition of value out of thin air. It can't be used for ANYTHING else other than trade.

FALSE!

It can be used for lots of things beside trade. Validating the creation date of a piece of software by inserting a hash into the blockchain for example. Or auditing. Or many other uses.

http://www.whyisntbitcoinworthless.com/

hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 501
I hope the new guys do freak because I like to buy things that are undervalued. I've increased my share holding by 8.19% in 6 weeks only by reinvesting dividends at the market price and I'd like to keep on getting away with it forever.

I do the same, the divs from my direct share go to an offline secure wallet, the divs from my 85 Havelock TAT.AM shares are reinvested. Wish I could afford to buy moar right now but alas, I'm quite happy with what I have already. Grin
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 2178
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
IMHO what you are describing here is exactly one of the problems we have with the current system... creating value out of thin air. A bit of overevaluation is fine, because in the end some companies will succeed, some will fail and we're somewhat even. A classic zero-sum game. An excess of overevaluation however leads to bubbles leads to disasters.

Either way, I'd be very careful in comparing Fiat based enterprises with Bitcoin operations. Right now $413 billion are 34.7% of all USD outstanding, but given inflation it won't stay that way. The volume might increase, but it's always a run from inflation. With Bitcoin however, there's a point where it will stop. Right now there's new coins coming in, but come 50-100 years and there will be 21,000,000 BTC. End. Who knows how many USD will be out there by then? They will just keep coming and coming...

Um... bitcoin is the very definition of value out of thin air. It can't be used for ANYTHING else other than trade. It can't be used in manufacturing like gold/silver/etc, it can't be made into jewelry like diamonds... it's a straight up thin air value placeholder. The original comparison was valid, and it's perfectly OK for market cap to be greater than available currency, because market cap represents the sum of what investors were willing to value shares (note - this is not the same as paying for shares, since not all shares were purchased at today's prices) up through today for returns in the future. Even if we suddenly rewrote the rules and made it so that mining never generated another bitcoin today, the companies that continue to provide profit to investors will trade at more than the profit they generate because investors see the value in future returns. See: P/E ratios. The economic mechanisms at work in open markets still work with bitcoin the same as fiat, and that's OK - the main difference between fiat and bitcoin is that fiat can be printed to the extent that a single unit can be practically worthless (inflationary) while bitcoin cannot, but it can be lost (deflationary).

I wasn't talking about gold/silver/etc though, but USD. What other use has the Dollar other than trading? Wink

It's true that it's OK for the market cap to be greater than available currency, I just don't think that it's healthy. It's of course also true that future returns are part of the value.

However I think that the question of the market cap of an enterprise / operation is inherently different in an inflationary system (ie. USD) then in a deflationary market (ie. Bitcoin). For example a sum of TWO TRILLION DOLLAR (cue Dr. Evil) is more USD than exist today, but might very well exist in 50 years and therefore be at least hypothetically transferred. A sum of 30 MILLION BITCOINS however, will always remain a fantasy. Therefore these market caps have to be viewed differently. Just my two dutch tulips.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
It is very possible that there will be people that get their hands on the redesigned Block Eruptor blade before some people get their Avalon batch 3? And let's not get started with BFL...
Jump to: