Topic: aTriz and Lauda just got merit! - page 5. (Read 23276 times)
I guess those that were first on the forum get the highest privileges, I mean we clearly see from this first post how are those big guys manipulating the system they have created. Thing is you will always have some pyramid where ones with power are at the top and there is nothing we can do about it. You can chose to stay or leave that's it, they even added negative red feedback to OP, they give negative to to many people already. Its their show anyway we are some random people with who they are playing. Nobody is forcing you to stay.
You scammers will get what you deserve.It will be a personal satisfaction for me.
Would love to see your faces once it starts......priceless
Would love to see your faces once it starts......priceless
Looks like someone needs to stop sniffing glue....
You scammers will get what you deserve.It will be a personal satisfaction for me.
Would love to see your faces once it starts......priceless
Would love to see your faces once it starts......priceless
your rain of thunder?? from your heavy article? with your massive reach?
this is a Bitcoin forum, not some dodgy fiction book.. who are you the mighty Thor? give it up you Keyboard warrior shit poster and go back to tending the rice fields or whatever else you did before you came here to piss us all off.
You scammers will get what you deserve.It will be a personal satisfaction for me.
Would love to see your faces once it starts......priceless
Scamming isn't against the rules, just like account selling Would love to see your faces once it starts......priceless
You scammers will get what you deserve.It will be a personal satisfaction for me.
Would love to see your faces once it starts......priceless
Would love to see your faces once it starts......priceless
Quote
Let's see.I will send them emails directly from my company so I doubt they will have any issues trusting me .
I won't talk about the reach.I prefer to show it.
I make fulltime online marketing since 20 years for myself but also for big companies so i guess i know how to reach people.
But like i said.Let's not talk about it let's see what will come.
You guys really motivated me to the max to proof it to you
I won't talk about the reach.I prefer to show it.
I make fulltime online marketing since 20 years for myself but also for big companies so i guess i know how to reach people.
But like i said.Let's not talk about it let's see what will come.
You guys really motivated me to the max to proof it to you
Lets see.. Fire up those dodgy Gmail accounts.. no longer " Hello I am a Nigerian Prince and my father has died and left me seventy billion Dollars" now they will read " I am The great Thule and I have a bully please help me extend my reach and attack Lauda the great suppressor"
really? actions speak louder than words, all I have seen from you are threats, wasted HDD space and talk... you are a nothing you will achieve nothing... keep on at it THULE THE GREAT WITH THE GREAT REACH!!!
pathetic really.
Edit - and anyone who pays you for marketing is retarded as your spelling is worse than a 5 year old from Kazakhstan speaking English for the 1st time
You gotta admit you see their point.
There is no point. I can leave merit to whomever I want[1], wherever I want and in whatever amount I want. If you don't like it, then ask theymos to change the rules.Then why are you giving negative feedback to people for giving merit?
If something applies to other people, it should apply to you too.
Also, I really don't consider this (http://prntscr.com/i7czpx) to be worthy of a neg.
My belief is that this is not what the trust system was designed for.
You don't understand the Trust system then.My belief is that this is not what the trust system was designed for.
It's designed to fight against scams, can you trust someone with your BTC or not, not to neg people who attack you, no matter what they're saying.
Incorrect. Theymos supported the tagging similar liars (see Bcash case), therefore it is warranted even according to him (although, individual cases are debatable; we are talking about the type).[1] This works when you don't have an army of alts (see Quickseller et. al.).
You're comparing splitting the bitcoin client in 2 with someone saying you have "scammy behaviour"?
snip =
Let's see how many new Ad Campaigns you guys will get after that info campaign.
Nobody wants ad campaign managers who are out of control and hated by the community.
It's taking longer to publish it so i can collect all evidences and most important make sure that info will have an extremly high amount of reach so it will be noticed by the majority and will start
a big discussion about you guys in the crypto world
You want to dominate BCT and dictact your own made rules to the crypto world ?Let's see what the crypto community will reply to you faggot's plan
Let's see how many new Ad Campaigns you guys will get after that info campaign.
Nobody wants ad campaign managers who are out of control and hated by the community.
It's taking longer to publish it so i can collect all evidences and most important make sure that info will have an extremly high amount of reach so it will be noticed by the majority and will start
a big discussion about you guys in the crypto world
You want to dominate BCT and dictact your own made rules to the crypto world ?Let's see what the crypto community will reply to you faggot's plan
how many Ad Campaigns? all of them.. your trust is worthless just like your words and threats..
The community you refer to generally likes the people you are attacking, the ones who hate them are pajeets like you who farm accounts for sig payouts and bring no value..
you have no reach, the only reach you have is the reach-around you give to yourself whilst you hurl homophobic phrases at people who are 10x the person that you are.
Let's see.I will send them emails directly from my company so I doubt they will have any issues trusting me .
I won't talk about the reach.I prefer to show it.
I make fulltime online marketing since 20 years for myself but also for big companies so i guess i know how to reach people.
But like i said.Let's not talk about it let's see what will come.
You guys really motivated me to the max to proof it to you
snip =
Let's see how many new Ad Campaigns you guys will get after that info campaign.
Nobody wants ad campaign managers who are out of control and hated by the community.
It's taking longer to publish it so i can collect all evidences and most important make sure that info will have an extremly high amount of reach so it will be noticed by the majority and will start
a big discussion about you guys in the crypto world
You want to dominate BCT and dictact your own made rules to the crypto world ?Let's see what the crypto community will reply to you faggot's plan
Let's see how many new Ad Campaigns you guys will get after that info campaign.
Nobody wants ad campaign managers who are out of control and hated by the community.
It's taking longer to publish it so i can collect all evidences and most important make sure that info will have an extremly high amount of reach so it will be noticed by the majority and will start
a big discussion about you guys in the crypto world
You want to dominate BCT and dictact your own made rules to the crypto world ?Let's see what the crypto community will reply to you faggot's plan
how many Ad Campaigns? all of them.. your trust is worthless just like your words and threats..
The community you refer to generally likes the people you are attacking, the ones who hate them are pajeets like you who farm accounts for sig payouts and bring no value..
you have no reach, the only reach you have is the reach-around you give to yourself whilst you hurl homophobic phrases at people who are 10x the person that you are.
I would recommend everyone to leave them their honest feedback on their trust page as thats the most they care about.
"Honest" feedback? :/Once the campaign starts tomorrow
Wait, what?Giving 24h after that you will get arround 50 honest feedbacks about you.
So if your first threat was empty then why does this statement have any weight?
Once their trust is destroyed (like they did against legit accounts) they are GONE !!!!
Even if there are thousands of negative trust feedbacks sent to Lauda, The Pharmacist, or I (or any of the accounts that you have an issue with) they would still be untrusted and thus rendered useless.Let's see how many new Ad Campaigns you guys will get after that info campaign.
Nobody wants ad campaign managers who are out of control and hated by the community.
It's taking longer to publish it so i can collect all evidences and most important make sure that info will have an extremly high amount of reach so it will be noticed by the majority and will start
a big discussion about you guys in the crypto world
You want to dominate BCT and dictact your own made rules to the crypto world ?Let's see what the crypto community will reply to you faggot's plan
I would recommend everyone to leave them their honest feedback on their trust page as thats the most they care about.
"Honest" feedback? :/Once the campaign starts tomorrow
Wait, what?Giving 24h after that you will get arround 50 honest feedbacks about you.
So if your first threat was empty then why does this statement have any weight?
Once their trust is destroyed (like they did against legit accounts) they are GONE !!!!
Even if there are thousands of negative trust feedbacks sent to Lauda, The Pharmacist, or I (or any of the accounts that you have an issue with) they would still be untrusted and thus rendered useless.
I would recommend everyone to leave them their honest feedback on their trust page as thats the most they care about.
Once the campaign starts tomorrow all trust profiles of them will be linked directly so people can add quickly their feedback telling them what they think about their actions.
Once their trust is destroyed (like they did against legit accounts) they are GONE !!!!
Once the campaign starts tomorrow all trust profiles of them will be linked directly so people can add quickly their feedback telling them what they think about their actions.
Once their trust is destroyed (like they did against legit accounts) they are GONE !!!!
Glad i can deside on what posts i want to blow out my merrit.
Continue your cry song.
Quote
and gave his all away
No this wasnt all, this was max. Quote
Klaaas also wanted to get merit with Lauda
No, i wanted to test what the max was and i picked the ACE post.Continue your cry song.
So Lauda had joined the forum than pther people?
That's not even a valid question.or does Lauda = Theymos ?
since Lauda is having highest merit points as you said.
Highest rank =/= highest merit points.It's not a constructive post or benefited to the forums and both run same service called ALU 
It is very much a constructive post.As you said above, merit is based on the constructive post and now you are saying merit is for a known person. Why you change your words while posting here?
It's redundant to look through the post history of someone and distribute the number of merit points among the historical points when you can give them to a single post.Lauda deserve most trust points and merit on this board because he wants now to force project managers and ITO's to accept his own made rules which was not accepted by anyone or else he and his group is going to defame a legit project manager or even a whole ITO.
This DESERVE THE TITLE of "SCAMMER OF ALL TIME"
best of all Lauda demands to increase quality of posts and use this argument to abuse the trust feedback and in the same minute that asshole gives 50 merit to a post with a single word on it "Butthead"
You can clearly see how the asshole Lauda is concerned about the quality posts here
Tomorrow a big campaign will start against Lauda and all projects where he and his group are managers will be contacted and demanded for a clear statement of hiring such dumbasses who wants to force the whole community to accept their own made rules and more important their dominance
how about Sathoshi Nakamoto? Is he is the owner of this forums? as in his profile I see Founder.
No.Why don't you give the similar points who are opposite to your gang?
There is no gang and I don't have to give points to anyone.Is this is a Constructive post or is it helpful helpful to readers?
Yes, yes it is. It tells the uninformed reader that OP is spewing nonsense, and destroys another failed argument with sarcasm. Quote
Oh right OP, you'd still complain because you're a butthurt idiot.
Let me just fake my own timezone by posting during the night time and sleeping during the day. Genius.
Let me just fake my own timezone by posting during the night time and sleeping during the day. Genius.
Lauda How many forums you maintained in your life and how many forums you were be a member?
That's not your concern. So Lauda had joined the forum than pther people?
That's not even a valid question.or does Lauda = Theymos ?
since Lauda is having highest merit points as you said.
Highest rank =/= highest merit points.It's not a constructive post or benefited to the forums and both run same service called ALU
It is very much a constructive post.As you said above, merit is based on the constructive post and now you are saying merit is for a known person. Why you change your words while posting here?
It's redundant to look through the post history of someone and distribute the number of merit points among the historical points when you can give them to a single post.Is this is a Constructive post or is it helpful helpful to readers?
Quote
Oh right OP, you'd still complain because you're a butthurt idiot.
Let me just fake my own timezone by posting during the night time and sleeping during the day. Genius.
Let me just fake my own timezone by posting during the night time and sleeping during the day. Genius.
Lauda How many forums you maintained in your life and how many forums you were be a member?
In what sense are you comparing aTriz and Lauda to a dead horse?
And that the amount of threads created in this board against aTriz and Lauda is very high only is a sign of their abuse of power. It is the latter which is 'ridiculous' not that people react to it.
Those two don't necessarily follow. When you're adding to someone's criminal record (real-life equivalent of red trust for the sake of the comparison) then of course there will be backlash whether you're right or not. Just because someone is vocal about it does not mean that they are innocent. You may very well have ponzi promotors/owners creating scores of threads but would that mean there's an abuse of power?And that the amount of threads created in this board against aTriz and Lauda is very high only is a sign of their abuse of power. It is the latter which is 'ridiculous' not that people react to it.
My sad conclusion has to be that the forum owner himself has to be corrupt too, for otherwise he would not maintain the situation as it is.
It doesn't make sense to allow someone who can—and probably has and will—make people leave the forum because of the negative trust that they place upon them. If theymos wanted to generate more money he could simply let the rubbish continue while he rakes in the ad revenue.That's the evil thing about the forum governance. Laws and punishment are detached from each other. It's like the cop who's given the fiat to shoot whoever he likes, innocent or not.
I don't think you understand my point. The irony in Thule's arguments is that they continue to contradict one another. If he states that he did nothing wrong because it was not located in the rules then he should not be pursuing his arguments about any perceived scamming on Lauda's part, since scams are also against the rules.
So shall we all stop doing it then? 'I can be bad but you cannot' is not a good argument either.
Doing what? Sending merit? 
As you said above, merit is based on the constructive post and now you are saying merit is for a known person. Why you change your words while posting here?
I haven't, you just can't read. Try going through my post slowly, remembering everything I said. If you still can't understand it, I'll try to write it in simpler language for you. When will OP stop beating a dead horse?
At least create a single thread to express your concern. Its not like a single thread will remain unnoticed here.
The amount of threads created in this board against aTriz and Lauda is just ridiculous.
At least create a single thread to express your concern. Its not like a single thread will remain unnoticed here.
The amount of threads created in this board against aTriz and Lauda is just ridiculous.
In what sense are you comparing aTriz and Lauda to a dead horse?
And that the amount of threads created in this board against aTriz and Lauda is very high only is a sign of their abuse of power. It is the latter which is 'ridiculous' not that people react to it.
Are you telling me negative feedback should only be given to people who break the rules? Then in that case, spamming would warrant negative feedback and scams wouldn't. If we're going by that logic.
That's the evil thing about the forum governance. Laws and punishment are detached from each other. It's like the cop who's given the fiat to shoot whoever he likes, innocent or not.
Quote
"Because you are doing it, I can do it as well" is not a good argument.
So shall we all stop doing it then? 'I can be bad but you cannot' is not a good argument either.
So Lauda had joined the forum than pther people?
That's not even a valid question.or does Lauda = Theymos ?
since Lauda is having highest merit points as you said.
Highest rank =/= highest merit points.It's not a constructive post or benefited to the forums and both run same service called ALU
It is very much a constructive post.As you said above, merit is based on the constructive post and now you are saying merit is for a known person. Why you change your words while posting here?
It's redundant to look through the post history of someone and distribute the number of merit points among the historical points when you can give them to a single post.