Topic: aTriz and Lauda just got merit! - page 6. (Read 23258 times)

So Lauda had joined the forum than pther people? or does Lauda = Theymos ?
since Lauda is having highest merit points as you said.

It's not possible to merit a person, and therefore you have to merit a post that they have made. [/quote]
It's not a constructive post or benefited to the forums and both run same service called ALU 
As you said above, merit is based on the constructive post and now you are saying merit is for a known person.  Why you change your words while posting here?

You know Lutpin and do you know Theymos, Sathoshi NAKAMOTO?

Are you telling me negative feedback should only be given to people who break the rules? Then in that case, spamming would warrant negative feedback and scams wouldn't. If we're going by that logic.

"Because you are doing it, I can do it as well" is not a good argument.

Then why doesn't theymos remove Lauda from DT by excluding them from his trust list?

Theymos had no choice since you fucker already neg repped everyone.He staid behind you as Mod at that time but now you lost all credibility to him and thats for a reason.

There is no point. I can leave merit to whomever I want[1], wherever I want and in whatever amount I want. If you don't like it, then ask theymos to change the rules.

You don't understand the Trust system then.

Incorrect. Theymos supported the tagging similar liars (see Bcash case), therefore it is warranted even according to him (although, individual cases are debatable; we are talking about the type).

---

[1] This works when you don't have an army of alts (see Quickseller et. al.).

When will OP stop beating a dead horse?
At least create a single thread to express your concern. Its not like a single thread will remain unnoticed here.

The amount of threads created in this board against aTriz and Lauda is just ridiculous.

For the same reason the newbs are doing it.

I support the idea of the merit system being uncensored, since censoring it will make people afraid of spending their sMerits, however, if we want the newbs not to engage in Merit exchanges, there should be examples of that behaviour from trusted members.

You gotta admit you see their point.
If one of them gave someone 20 Merits for a post like that, and then got 10 back, someone would probably neg him.
I'm not saying that's wrong behaviour, I'm just saying we should try to set an example instead of saying omg, shitpost,spammer, stfu since simmilar behaviour on their end would be penalized and frowned upon, it can be hard to spot the differences for lower ranking members.

Also, I really don't consider this (http://prntscr.com/i7czpx) to be worthy of a neg.
My belief is that this is not what the trust system was designed for.
It's designed to fight against scams, can you trust someone with your BTC or not, not to neg people who attack you, no matter what they're saying.

Where is your problem ?

I got also negativ feedback for nothing and one for a rule which doesnt exist and you said youself its ok for you.
So why are you upset if i use the trustfeedback the same way ?
You didn't broke any rule.Normaly i would be happy about every negativ comment since i belive in free speach and to defend it but since you have no problem with abuse of it i just showed how it feels to get abused.
Am a bit shocked that now when it affects you personly you have a problem with it

Do not worry about untrusted feedback.  I have hundreds calling me everything in the book.

@Thule



Whats your problem with me? I did not do anything, I just told you that: " you wanted to buy an account" something disgusting... and for that reason you left me negative feedback?

[quote author=The Pharmacist link=topic=2829282.msg29130003#msg29130003 date=1517174338]
[quote author=Thule link=topic=2829282.msg29115267#msg29115267 date=1517159042]
Have a look who exposed them and have a look at their profil how they are trying hard to destroy his rep
[/quote]Thule, I admire your ferociousness and you don't appear to be a total shitposter, but you're on the wrong side of the battlefield, buddy.  And the way you post makes me think you just might be an alt of Quickseller, but I'm not outright accusing you of that, nor am I a paranoid person by nature. 

The thing is, most people--even if they do nothing about it--realize how bad the quality of posts has gotten on bitcointalk, and to a lesser extent they realize that dealing in accounts is seriously toxic to the forum.  People buy them and leverage any trust that the account has in order to scam.  I'm pretty sure when I got scammed out of 0.3BTC in 2016, the TimSweat account was a bought one.  And if the person isn't scamming, he's taking a shortcut in order to shitpost in a sig campaign.  Both of those things aren't good, and that's why we tag the accounts.
[/quote]

It's Probable:

Name:    Thule
Posts:    527
Activity:    322
Merit:    257
Position:    Sr. Member
Date Registered:    15 July 2014, 01:35:37

Received Merit from QS:

---

13 July 2014, 15:46:25 Date Registered:        orryde u=354974
16 July 2014, 04:34:45 Date Registered:    superSTAR777 u=355868
19 July 2014, 08:42:05 Date Registered:    z3r0coin u=357026 http://archive.is/GpA5U
20 July 2014, 05:29:56 Date Registered:    ACCTseller u=357263
20 July 2014, 06:40:20 Date Registered:    deluxeCITY u=357282
21 July 2014, 01:31:08 Date Registered:    Panthers52 u=357487
22 July 2014, 15:51:40 Date Registered:    Quickseller u=358020
01 August 2014, 18:39:15 Date Registered:    twister u=361475

---

Hmm...

16 June 2014, 03:27:23 Date Registered:        BiPolarBob u=343899

First post in 14 months: Archive: http://archive.is/ygJi6#selection-479.0-485.4



Previous last post  http://archive.is/8NEat#selection-399.1-489.35

Just strange (that QS would give this post merit) really...

Who added the merit system? Who added the trust system? Who added DefaultTrust?

Who controls the forum?

Who controls the forum?

Decentralized, huh?

LOL.  I personally don't have a deep gripe with you, though you are probably a shitposter.  I liked this post, however and gave you 1 merit point for it.  May you never rank up to Sr. Member without significantly improving your output.

Isn't this basically how we're supposed to be using the merit system, i.e., as a "like" function?  I may not like some of the users I've given merits to, but some of the posts I respect and some (like Deena's here) took a little bit of effort, which I can appreciate.  I have not so far only given merits to people I "like" or who are in "my circle".

Agree with your thought that the new merit system and small group control the forum power will be lead people to replace BCT and move to other board where the money is. it is clear that all this war by this group is to control the largest share of the gain available here in this forum.

Sorry my sense of justice doesn't allow me that.They abused so many people and defamed me with their false accuses that it's time to teach them a lesson.
Once it will reach high amounts of crypto readers which i'm currently preparing you will see how they will run and try to fix everything
All campaigns Lauda is managing will be contacted and forwarded with Lauda's idea to defame project managers and ITO's which won't follow their rules which they decide in their small circle.

You will see how quickly they will distance from such a person which is the opposite of the main idea of decentralisation.

The viral effect will be heavy expecially as all the thousands of people who got abused by Lauda and that group will be joining that route.

Reddit front page is ready to go.Some more stuff and the action will take place

Thule do the same thing I did. Move foward. We won't be blocked from using this forum because of a neg rate. I tried to apologize and asking a second chance, you tried, everyone tried. They don't give a shit about it (with a very few exceptions of DT members).

No you are trying to change a decentralised forum into a centralised forum where the power is being hold in the hands of a few people who have proofed in the past that they abused it already and giving shit about it.
You want to fight selling account than first change the forum guideline and make it forbidden on that forum but don't act like your small group is going to decide what is allowed and what not based on some BS conversation you have in your small circle.

Reading already that you are going to defame project managers and ITO's which won't follow your rules for accepting members is just insane and shows me that you guys totaly lost control of your mind.
You clearly see no borders in the name of fighting spam and scam.

Your group has abused hundreds of legit accounts mine included and you basicly give shit about it.
Somebody got scammed and you are concerned about it ?I got defamed and you don't even care so don't tell me you care about people who got scammed.

And to say the truth i piss in everyones mouth who creates these kind of leadership.
You think BCT can't be replaced ?It can happen very quickly and i know it from past experience since i work on I-Marketing for over 20 years fulltime

People will quickly move where the money is and not where a group of pisshead is trying to establish themself in the name of protecting of scam.
People won't stay here because of you pissheads you need to release it.There are here because of the coins and ITO's and they can quickly move to another board and you can trust me most members will follow them without even thinkning about it and you will get your dead forum which you seem to look for

Thule, I admire your ferociousness and you don't appear to be a total shitposter, but you're on the wrong side of the battlefield, buddy.  And the way you post makes me think you just might be an alt of Quickseller, but I'm not outright accusing you of that, nor am I a paranoid person by nature. 

The thing is, most people--even if they do nothing about it--realize how bad the quality of posts has gotten on bitcointalk, and to a lesser extent they realize that dealing in accounts is seriously toxic to the forum.  People buy them and leverage any trust that the account has in order to scam.  I'm pretty sure when I got scammed out of 0.3BTC in 2016, the TimSweat account was a bought one.  And if the person isn't scamming, he's taking a shortcut in order to shitpost in a sig campaign.  Both of those things aren't good, and that's why we tag the accounts.

You guys are clear scammers who are getting now exposed