Topic: AUGMENTORS GAME Augmented Reality Mobile Gaming iOS Android Token DTB Databits - page 66. (Read 136181 times)

Hi, PM me your email address and I'll have someone from the team get in contact with you.

Guys sorry i missed a lot of information here I wonder how many ICO invested so far ? and there was available bonuses though i also looking for important information here,guys please let me know

There is a dedicated bounty channel on the Slack for easy/fast communication.

I have raised your issue there.

If I decide to buy a second package, or different package, can I use the same email and counterwallet address?

A few days ago I sent a submittion through spreadsheets with my e-mail about traslations bounty, im still waiting for an answer.

I'd also add from Adam B. Levine whose co-ordinating the ICO from the Tokenly side has asked me to respond from the Slack with:

"You've done everything right. You'll get an email to confirm your Counterparty Compatible Address before your tokens are distributed, which will be within a month of the close of the campaign. If you have any further questions email [email protected]"

Furthermore to clarify for anyone asking, you can buy as many packages as you want.

Yes and yes, into the counterparty wallet. Before this happens you will be asked to confirm that previously provided address, also.

I bought a package and I just wanted to clarify I did everything correctly as I have never used counterparty before. I made a wallet at counterwallet.io, saved my passphrase then logged in. I clicked to purchase the package with tokenly. I entered the counter address during checkout, and sent the bitcoin from my desktop btc wallet to changely. After the btc confirms, I got an email from changely saying my order was confirmed. Nothing changed with the counterparty wallet though. Will the DTB be sent to the counterwallet somehow? And how will I get access to my token to redeem? Will it be sent to my email, or to the counterwallet?

It's not the most widely publicised ICO and therefore I find more small-time investors miss ICO's like this. It also tends to be the 'whales' with enough brains to discern a potential profitable ICO when they see one. Likewise small-time investors are put off by other factors like potential scams and again sadly aren't sometimes able to tell. There's lots of different factors really, including the early notification to SoG investors who were already knowledgable in the area and probably wealthy enough. Could get into it but would probably end up going off on a tangent for ICO's in general.  

Well I don't mind posting, I know other 'whales' are deliberately not shouting from the roof-top. Personally I'm hoping for over $1 million of investment so I want to keep awareness up. It would be remiss of me to say the project still represents good value if you get in now or later. I said to someone earlier I don't enter ICO's for 20-30% profit Furthermore the added package incentives such as limited cards can be played to your advantage if you choose the right package/creature. I am bias none the less.

1. It's quite clear to me that the investments are real. In a multitude of ways, not least the fact that if they weren't would imply the whole thing a scam. The escrow address can be viewed here FYI: https://blockchain.info/address/32m58KhzMxYFh5L6UVG6U2ort65snJffP9. I'm also one of the most frequent faces amongst cryptocurrency Slacks (I know it's terrible, but I like to know everything I can), so yes I recognise and know some active big 'whales'. With regards to Bitcointalk activity unfortunately I/we get the feeling the Augmentors team aren't the biggest fans or most experienced of Bitcointalk. This 'issue' has been raised. Likewise as you said people may be keeping quiet for fear of dilution. There may be other reasons too.

2. Of the listed team members two of the developers have years of experience behind them: http://bit.ly/2kfPDrF http://bit.ly/2jW4tov. The founders also have design, branding, management experience and innovation/ambition. Likewise the mentoring of verified, public figures in the two 'shark-tank' investors they have on board. It's quite enough to not have me worrying about such things.

Hope that helps

Here I calculated and filled the total number of packages as promised above:
Would appreciate if someobody from the team confirms this is correct.

@Mlich, @CryptoMrM:

thanks for clearing up the confusion with numbers.

Now I can see the number of packages is probably equal to number of creatures included.
Will calculate shortly and post.

Interesting enough - obviously the most investors here are bigger ones. The biggest packages are sold like crazy. This looks to be backed by whales more than by public...

@CryptoMrM: you seem to be very optimistic. I have few questions to you if you don't mind... Now you and other whales can post more without fear of diluting their investment (yes, I took notice of your previous post on this... ), because the big bonus time has passed (alas...), so now project has to try to attract the remaining funds at much less attractive price...
1. There are a lot of big investors apparently. What makes you think those investments are real? Have you met appropriate interest on Slack. Here at BCT, there was no interest shown up by most to now...
2. Aren't you concerned about the fact the lead developers are not professionals, and apparently do not have any experience and even appropriate education?

Yes real utility/usecase is important and is one of the things I think about when looking at ICO's.

However I am also in this business of 'big profits' and I can also see Augmentors doing well in this regard

Updated

My new favourite poster. Someone who gets it ^^^

i don't think it will bring big profit for investors, I just want to support the real purpose to reduce the distance between cryptocurrey world and normal world.

Yes, it seems that this project will work accurately and bring profit to investors.

All the invesment is risk, invest you can afford to lose.
I think it is a great project because games based on the bitcoin blockchain

No need to be rude. You're attitude is much like all the scammers who get pissed of and think they're better than the others.
You put yourself into the "we". I refer to people (in the previous page) who are asking and haven't get any answers.