I found him, my mistake.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balder_%28comics%29
At this point in time, does it matter who he is though? I can assure you that I personally know 5 members of the new team, and have been acquainted with the rest, and they are most certainly not Balduro.
If the coin is in new hands, and the premine was burned, does Balduro matter? That's like trying to continue the hunt for satoshi.
-Fuse
It wouldn't matter if there wasn't a premine, there is a lot of issues surrounding the other 25% of the premine, he has a lot of explaining to do.
In all seriousness, though, what would you like addressed? Coins were airdropped to whoever claimed them. The remaining coins sat in wallets that the AUR team had already planned to block should Balduro not come through with his initial promise. Balduro then, as he said he would, burned the remaining coins in a dump address(which can be seen in this transaction https://chainz.cryptoid.info/aur/tx.dws?490947.htm). He is no longer involved in the workings of this coin. It seems pretty clear.
For those that have already responded about the FUD, I think we should hear it out. If we can't clearly state what the current situation is, and what our current position is with AUR, then we can't dismiss the FUD.
So Eggert, What's left to discuss about it? What's left for him to explain? I want to see if I can get you whatever answers you need to be at peace with your thoughts about AUR.
-Fuse
You can explain yourself in this discussion.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11225376
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennitala
The initial hype arround AUR just before the airdrop when 31.8 of them worth 600$+, attracted 30.000+ airdrop requests.
After the dump the number of second airdrop request went down to 5000+
And the 3'rd airdrop request went even lower to 2500+
Because the value of the airdop coins is so low now, they have no use in merchant transaction. It's something that you just trade if you have a taste for risk or you firmly believe in the concept propose by AUR coin.
But with the newly dedicated foundation that holds a marketing and development budget, this will change in time.
Do you know what the developer did to advertise AUR to the people in Iceland. I am part of the Guldencoin community and as you can see with our distribtion stats under 2000 people have claimed with a population of 17 million in the Netherlands. The coin has also just turned 1 year old and has plenty merchants, been on the media and even RT but only 1918 people have claimed. Any tips or ideas the AUR developer used would be welcomed.
https://distribution.guldencoin.com/#/stats
Something that is a concern is that EFL with the same coin supply also claimed around 40 000 people in the Netherlands claimed but that was proven as a scam as the coin creators got caught out by having bigger sells in EFL on the exchanges then was meant to be in supply at the time. Now there has been community takeover and they also got a foundation built. Looks like AUR going to head in same direction.
I know some members in Guldencoin have invested in AUR so came to check it out so please let me know how they advertised and I can give this information to our team.
Let me share come facts and opinions I have about AUR.
1. I proved to myself it was a scam when I did some peer lookups during the airdrop,there was less then 150 active nodes. I would say less then 70 at this point in time.
2. The developer is not from Iceland, this is the reason you will never ever get him to reveal his true identity.
3. AUR was created by a smart and patient investor who most likely can wait it out and present some feel good stories to con people.
4. Same sock accounts used to defend the coin.
5. Not in a million years was 40 000 AUR given to unique people as per point 1.
Don't u think the dev deserve to be rich for his good idea even though he scam at start? Many inventor sell idea and invention for lots of money. The way I see the dev deserve to be rich.