[Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 188.

Sibtigr

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

The problem appeared after the last update. Before that, the web interface worked fine. I had to switch to the old version of the web interface so that it worked. I will send screenshots later. Also, this problem was noticed on more than one server. and a few.

moppidoo

jr. member

Activity: 348

Merit: 5

Quote from: patrike on April 01, 2019, 08:08:54 AM

Thanks for the details. Although I'm not seeing the same issue myself, I did get a good understanding of what to look for.

Quick question - if you change between Classic and New, it's always required to restart Awesome Miner once (it also says 'Requires restart' in the user interface). Were you able to reproduce the problem with this in mind?

Edit: I can force the problem if I start Awesome Miner with a different "Startup In" folder configured. Although you probably didn't change this setting, there can probably be other cases where Awesome Miner needs to handle this scenario. I will implement a more fail-safe concept for the paths in the next release.

Just to add, it was partially my AM Host PC's fault as well, I had a BSOD on the host and perhaps some AM settings weren't flushed to disk and caused issues on the subsequent startup, and this seemed consistent, had another BSOD overnight (yes, shouldn't mine on the AM host, or at least no excessive OC lol ;P ) and now web interface is down with the same error when AM auto starts with windows login

(also, sorry didn't answer your question, don't quite understand it)

trucobit

jr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 2

A DARK version for the windows version would not be bad. I have extension in chrome to see the pages in black, I have the DARK mode of Apple on the mac. When I work at night, a screen with too much white burns my eyes, it's a lot of light. I do not know if it will be possible, it is not the same web programming as the installable windows programming, but it would be fine. This falls within the unimportant foolish requests, but that would be nice.

trucobit

jr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 2

https://grinscan.net/

@PAtrike or @moppidoo you know how I can get Grin difficulty from that explorer. We have been trying for days and we can not find a way to obtain it. Basically it is the only currency that resists us to obtain the difficulty in real time.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: moppidoo on April 01, 2019, 08:04:01 AM

Quote from: patrike on April 01, 2019, 04:09:43 AM

Quote from: Sibtigr on April 01, 2019, 01:06:59 AM

Hi
Beta version developer
Not work web interface
Erorr web load
Check please.

I just tested with both the Classic and New user interfaces for the built-in web and from what I can see it's working fine with both.

Can you please share more details on this issue? Can you share a screenshot? Is the problem for a specific web browser only?

Are you using the Classic or New interface (see Options dialog, Web section)?
Thanks!

Hi Patrike,

This error was intermittent, but below was the error I also have encountered:

Code:

Nancy.RequestExecutionException: Oh noes! ---> System.IO.DirectoryNotFoundException: Could not find a part of the path 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\WebNew\index.html'.
   at System.IO.__Error.WinIOError(Int32 errorCode, String maybeFullPath)
   at System.IO.FileStream.Init(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, Int32 rights, Boolean useRights, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize, FileOptions options, SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES secAttrs, String msgPath, Boolean bFromProxy, Boolean useLongPath, Boolean checkHost)
   at System.IO.FileStream..ctor(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize, FileOptions options, String msgPath, Boolean bFromProxy, Boolean useLongPath, Boolean checkHost)
   at System.IO.StreamReader..ctor(String path, Encoding encoding, Boolean detectEncodingFromByteOrderMarks, Int32 bufferSize, Boolean checkHost)
   at System.IO.File.InternalReadAllText(String path, Encoding encoding, Boolean checkHost)
   at AwesomeMiner.Components.InterfaceProviders.WebModule.ProcessHtmlFile(String file)
   at Nancy.Routing.Route.<>c__DisplayClass4.b__3(Object parameters, CancellationToken context)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at Nancy.NancyEngine.InvokeOnErrorHook(NancyContext context, ErrorPipeline pipeline, Exception ex)

Using Chrome, Opera, IE....

Using New interface

Currently I found it only gets rectified by restarting AM host

Thanks for the details. Although I'm not seeing the same issue myself, I did get a good understanding of what to look for.

Quick question - if you change between Classic and New, it's always required to restart Awesome Miner once (it also says 'Requires restart' in the user interface). Were you able to reproduce the problem with this in mind?

Edit: I can force the problem if I start Awesome Miner with a different "Startup In" folder configured. Although you probably didn't change this setting, there can probably be other cases where Awesome Miner needs to handle this scenario. I will implement a more fail-safe concept for the paths in the next release.

moppidoo

jr. member

Activity: 348

Merit: 5

Quote from: patrike on April 01, 2019, 04:09:43 AM

Quote from: Sibtigr on April 01, 2019, 01:06:59 AM

Hi
Beta version developer
Not work web interface
Erorr web load
Check please.

I just tested with both the Classic and New user interfaces for the built-in web and from what I can see it's working fine with both.

Can you please share more details on this issue? Can you share a screenshot? Is the problem for a specific web browser only?

Are you using the Classic or New interface (see Options dialog, Web section)?
Thanks!

Hi Patrike,

This error was intermittent, but below was the error I also have encountered:

Code:

Nancy.RequestExecutionException: Oh noes! ---> System.IO.DirectoryNotFoundException: Could not find a part of the path 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\WebNew\index.html'.
   at System.IO.__Error.WinIOError(Int32 errorCode, String maybeFullPath)
   at System.IO.FileStream.Init(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, Int32 rights, Boolean useRights, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize, FileOptions options, SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES secAttrs, String msgPath, Boolean bFromProxy, Boolean useLongPath, Boolean checkHost)
   at System.IO.FileStream..ctor(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize, FileOptions options, String msgPath, Boolean bFromProxy, Boolean useLongPath, Boolean checkHost)
   at System.IO.StreamReader..ctor(String path, Encoding encoding, Boolean detectEncodingFromByteOrderMarks, Int32 bufferSize, Boolean checkHost)
   at System.IO.File.InternalReadAllText(String path, Encoding encoding, Boolean checkHost)
   at AwesomeMiner.Components.InterfaceProviders.WebModule.ProcessHtmlFile(String file)
   at Nancy.Routing.Route.<>c__DisplayClass4.b__3(Object parameters, CancellationToken context)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at Nancy.NancyEngine.InvokeOnErrorHook(NancyContext context, ErrorPipeline pipeline, Exception ex)

Using Chrome, Opera, IE....

Using New interface

Currently I found it only gets rectified by restarting AM host

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: Sibtigr on April 01, 2019, 01:06:59 AM

Hi
Beta version developer
Not work web interface
Erorr web load
Check please.

I just tested with both the Classic and New user interfaces for the built-in web and from what I can see it's working fine with both.

Can you please share more details on this issue? Can you share a screenshot? Is the problem for a specific web browser only?

Are you using the Classic or New interface (see Options dialog, Web section)?
Thanks!

Dalba

newbie

Activity: 92

Merit: 0

Quote from: trucobit on March 31, 2019, 11:29:36 AM

Quote from: Dalba on March 31, 2019, 02:59:38 AM

Quote from: patrike on March 30, 2019, 06:52:40 PM

Quote from: Dalba on March 30, 2019, 03:45:40 AM

Hello Patrike,
For a number of coins, i used to specify only binance in exchange list filter. Since last update, this is no longer working. All coins where only binance was used, are marked in grey in coins tab.
Could you check this please ?

Do you have any example of a coin where it's listed with Binance on the coin statistics web site, but not show up with Binance in Awesome Miner? There are still quite a number of coins from CTM that shows up with Binance in Awesome Miner.

Sure, I have problems with RVN, XZC, XVG, BTG for example.

try to see if in option you have activated the volume filters or exchange filters. Those coins that you comment, I have them with binance and I do not have any problem

In this, it reflects the order of the providers. If you want it to work well I advise this order
CTM
WTM
Coinwarz
Coinscalculator

Especially having CTM first, this I think will solve the problem

Thanks for advice, it now work well as before !

Sibtigr

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

Hi
Beta version developer
Not work web interface
Erorr web load
Check please.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: joseph32 on March 31, 2019, 04:37:43 PM

Hey Patrik,

is it possible to add more times to the benchmark? Like 30m, 60m, 2h, 5h, 10h?

Some coins have a widely range of hashrate and a 20 minutes bench cant catch the real average.

Thanks for the suggestion. Yes, it's easy to add a few more. You can expect this in the next release.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: MHyza on March 31, 2019, 04:04:51 PM

Quote from: patrike on March 31, 2019, 03:39:53 PM

Quote from: MHyza on March 31, 2019, 01:34:24 PM

Hi Patrike,

not fastest benchmarks are lost again.. Sad

Thanks for the correction

M.

There was a correction for a scenario I identified a few weeks ago related to non-best benchmark results, included in the last few versions of Awesome Miner.

Have you seen a specific scenario where recent versions give this issue? I've not had any other reports on the issue after the previous correction.

Thanks for info.
I've just lost all non-best benchmark results on few RIGs, but this could be from a previous error. Sorry, my bad. I did not check it on them last time.

Anyway - Awesome miner is a truly an impressive program and it is still improving. Native overclocking is really awesome!

Thanks for your great work.

Thanks for the update. Please let me know if you run into this problem again. Also - many thanks for the nice feedback about the Native overclocking!

joseph32

member

Activity: 418

Merit: 21

Hey Patrik,

is it possible to add more times to the benchmark? Like 30m, 60m, 2h, 5h, 10h?

Some coins have a widely range of hashrate and a 20 minutes bench cant catch the real average.

MHyza

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: patrike on March 31, 2019, 03:39:53 PM

Quote from: MHyza on March 31, 2019, 01:34:24 PM

Hi Patrike,

not fastest benchmarks are lost again.. Sad

Thanks for the correction

M.

There was a correction for a scenario I identified a few weeks ago related to non-best benchmark results, included in the last few versions of Awesome Miner.

Have you seen a specific scenario where recent versions give this issue? I've not had any other reports on the issue after the previous correction.

Thanks for info.
I've just lost all non-best benchmark results on few RIGs, but this could be from a previous error. Sorry, my bad. I did not check it on them last time.

Anyway - Awesome miner is a truly an impressive program and it is still improving. Native overclocking is really awesome!

Thanks for your great work.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: MHyza on March 31, 2019, 01:34:24 PM

Hi Patrike,

not fastest benchmarks are lost again.. Sad

Thanks for the correction

M.

There was a correction for a scenario I identified a few weeks ago related to non-best benchmark results, included in the last few versions of Awesome Miner.

Have you seen a specific scenario where recent versions give this issue? I've not had any other reports on the issue after the previous correction.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: slysir on March 31, 2019, 08:04:51 AM

Patrike maybe add this new Equihash miner.

miniZ is a fast new equihash miner: https://miniz.ch/

Works on Linux and Windows with compatible API EWBF(4028).

I Tested 144,5 on zergpool: single RTX2060 gets 53 Sols vs. 45 Sols with Gminer.

miniZ supports Equihash <144,5>, <192,7>, and <96,5> mining:

Bitcoin Gold (BTG)
BitcoinZ (BTCZ)
ZelCash (ZEL)
ANONymous (ANON)
SnowGem (XSG)
Bithereum (BTH)
BZEdge (BZE)
LitecoinZ (LTZ)
Bitcoin RM (BCRM)
SafeCoin (SAFE)
Zero (ZER)
Genesis (GENX)
Vidulum (VDL)
ZeroClassic (ZERC)
Minexcoin (MNX)

Thanks for the suggestion. This one should be quite easy to support as it already have an API similar to other mining software.

After I added Nanominer, this one might be next in line.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: trucobit on March 31, 2019, 11:29:36 AM

Quote from: Dalba on March 31, 2019, 02:59:38 AM

Quote from: patrike on March 30, 2019, 06:52:40 PM

Quote from: Dalba on March 30, 2019, 03:45:40 AM

Hello Patrike,
For a number of coins, i used to specify only binance in exchange list filter. Since last update, this is no longer working. All coins where only binance was used, are marked in grey in coins tab.
Could you check this please ?

Do you have any example of a coin where it's listed with Binance on the coin statistics web site, but not show up with Binance in Awesome Miner? There are still quite a number of coins from CTM that shows up with Binance in Awesome Miner.

Sure, I have problems with RVN, XZC, XVG, BTG for example.

try to see if in option you have activated the volume filters or exchange filters. Those coins that you comment, I have them with binance and I do not have any problem

In this, it reflects the order of the providers. If you want it to work well I advise this order
CTM
WTM
Coinwarz
Coinscalculator

Especially having CTM first, this I think will solve the problem

I also think this is the solution. CTM uses Binance for a number of coins, while CoinCalculators doesn't use Binance for any coin at the moment.

If CoinCalculators is given higher priority, Awesome Miner will use RVN and so on from CoinCalculators and Binance will not be used even if it's reported for RVN from CTM.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: moppidoo on March 30, 2019, 10:32:34 PM

Quote from: patrike on March 30, 2019, 06:50:30 PM

Quote from: moppidoo on March 30, 2019, 12:35:02 AM

Hi Patrike,

little issue with dynamic update (via wallet JSON-RPC), I'm running a TZC (TrezarCoin - Neoscrypt) node and setting up RPC for access, difficulty was easy with the

Code:

getinfo

method

then I try to get the Block Reward (reported by pool as incorrect, in my experience, all blocks are 100 TZC so far, ZergPool reports 80 TZC, CoinToMine reports 92 as it uses pools data and avg), so I setup the dynamic update call with getblocktemplate method

Code:

{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getblocktemplate", "params": [{"rules":["segwit"]}] }

and AM read the value without issues from the UI with JSON propertie expression:

Code:

result.coinbasevalue

+ Arithmetic operation

Code:

/ 1000000

however, in the coins tab, only the difficulty gets updated and the Block Reward remains at 0.0 when I enable dynamic update from coin properties (check only Difficulty + Dynamic update, Block reward + Dynamic Update checkboxes)

Could you please see if you you can replicate the issue when you have the chance, Thank you!

I've not seen the issue with Block Reward not getting updated. Is the value for Block Reward 0 in the Coin Properties dialog as well?

If you configure the same expression for the Difficulty property instead (putting the Block Reward value in the wrong field, just as a test), is the Difficulty updated correctly?

I don't have access to the wallet JSON-RPC to test with right now, but I can check out this in more detail tomorrow if needed.

Hi Patrike, good suggestion about testing it on the difficulty field, same property also doesn't update on the difficulty field when I deliberately point to it, please see screenshot

https://i.supload.com/Hyern4h6dN.jpg

I wasn't able to reproduce this one.

You probably figured out this already, but just to be sure:
1) Please note that the Block reward field is only updated dynamically if the both the Block Reward checkbox and the Dynamic Update button below are checked in the Coin Properties dialog.
2) The value will not be updated when you click the Test button. The best way to test the actual update is to save the coin properties, click Update Now in the toolbar and wait a number of seconds. Awesome Miner updates the dynamic values after all coin statistics sources have been processed.

I will add better logging for the Dynamic Update feature in the next release, to make it easier to find any issues during updates.

MHyza

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Hi Patrike,

not fastest benchmarks are lost again.. Sad

Thanks for the correction

M.

trucobit

jr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 2

Quote from: Dalba on March 31, 2019, 02:59:38 AM

Quote from: patrike on March 30, 2019, 06:52:40 PM

Quote from: Dalba on March 30, 2019, 03:45:40 AM

Hello Patrike,
For a number of coins, i used to specify only binance in exchange list filter. Since last update, this is no longer working. All coins where only binance was used, are marked in grey in coins tab.
Could you check this please ?

Do you have any example of a coin where it's listed with Binance on the coin statistics web site, but not show up with Binance in Awesome Miner? There are still quite a number of coins from CTM that shows up with Binance in Awesome Miner.

Sure, I have problems with RVN, XZC, XVG, BTG for example.

try to see if in option you have activated the volume filters or exchange filters. Those coins that you comment, I have them with binance and I do not have any problem

In this, it reflects the order of the providers. If you want it to work well I advise this order
CTM
WTM
Coinwarz
Coinscalculator

Especially having CTM first, this I think will solve the problem

slysir

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

Patrike maybe add this new Equihash miner.

miniZ is a fast new equihash miner: https://miniz.ch/

Works on Linux and Windows with compatible API EWBF(4028).

I Tested 144,5 on zergpool: single RTX2060 gets 53 Sols vs. 45 Sols with Gminer.

miniZ supports Equihash <144,5>, <192,7>, and <96,5> mining:

Bitcoin Gold (BTG)
BitcoinZ (BTCZ)
ZelCash (ZEL)
ANONymous (ANON)
SnowGem (XSG)
Bithereum (BTH)
BZEdge (BZE)
LitecoinZ (LTZ)
Bitcoin RM (BCRM)
SafeCoin (SAFE)
Zero (ZER)
Genesis (GENX)
Vidulum (VDL)
ZeroClassic (ZERC)
Minexcoin (MNX)

Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 188. (Read 703146 times)