Pages:
Author

Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 72. (Read 703113 times)

legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031
is it possible to switch between 2 gpu miners I have created in awesome miner?  I figure this would be a profit switching thing but I need to be able to manually control the profit switching parameters which doesn't seem possible.  

I mine a coin that uses 3 algorithms.  1 algo for GPU, 1 for CPU, and 1 for ASIC and it rotates so 38% of the time it's GPU, 60% CPU, and 2% ASIC.

So one miner I made mines that 3-Algo coin and I made a second miner to mine other things when the first miner is not mining it's 38%.

The problem right now is that both miners just run equally so I don't get the full hashrate on the 3-algo coin because the other miner is stealing resources.

Thank you for any help.
Thanks for your question. This sounds like a very special case.

If the first mining software is doing active mining only 38% of the time, the main question is how Awesome Miner can know when it's mining and when it isn't mining. Is the mining software running all the time, but only get work from the pool 38% of the time, resulting in a hashrate above zero for 38% of the time and a hashrate of 0H/s the remaining time?

If it's possible to define a criteria from an Awesome Miner point of view, it should be possible to use the rules in Awesome Miner (Options dialog, Rules section). You could have one rule looking for the scenario when to start the second miner and another rule to look for the scenario when to stop the second miner. The Miner Statistics trigger can be used on the first miner to detect hashrate levels for example.

Thank you very much for your thoughtful reply.  I'm really tired today and spent a lot of time this weekend staying up way to late because I just thought API interactions were so cool but I'm not actually a programmer lol

For now, this inventions mother, necessity, is on hiatus as profitability of Grin mining took a dump.  I'll definitely reference this in the future and look more into rules as you suggest.

I did learn a lot about awesome miner.  It doesn't play very nice after a miner is converted to profit switching mode.  I say that because in the normal mode I had it configured to use a specific bat file but I think it goes to the default downloaded miner location after switching to profit mode.  I was playing around a lot with the command line syntax and trying to find places where I had somehow configured the command line twice.  Ultimatetly, I got it to where both miners would run in "profit mode" but when the EPIC cash miner wasn't active it would stop the miner because I think it didn't know what to do.  I was also having difficulty convincing the miner that EPIC was profitable even though the coin parameters all correctly parsed to API links I tested and my profit profile seemed similar to the one I configured for Grin (which worked and showed profit).

edit: By the way, I can "dual/alternate" mine in TTminer for epic/ethereum but TTminer does not support grin.  The programmer there just made it so I append an "AALT" alternative miner line of commands after the first line of commands for the primary coin/algo.

edit2:  Just tracking this further, "You could have one rule looking for the scenario when to start the second miner and another rule to look for the scenario when to stop the second miner. The Miner Statistics trigger can be used on the first miner to detect hashrate levels for example."  Or to put this in other words, I could have a rule that starts the Grin miner when the epic miner hashrate drops to some level and then another rule to stop the grin miner when Epic hashrate goes up again.  and maybe even another rule to never kill the epic miner no matter what.  So, start/stop rules for Grin and hopefully an always on rule for epic.  "The Miner Statistics trigger" ...tracking!

It's the same thing as you are saying.  It just helps me to get closer to how it can work.  Truth is, I'll probably poke away at this some more because it's so neat lol.

take care!  Smiley
full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 100
lolminer API problem

I am testing lolminer to mine ETH.

look:



https://prnt.sc/v1vwe5

As you can see it is not reporting the tempeture, and the hashrate is wrong..

In blu, you can see phonenixminer reporting ok...
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Is it possible to make a guide on how to install AM on hiveos or raveos or another linex OS
To make everything work?
Step by step
Can you please let me know if the general instructions are working in your setup?

Once you login to the Linux system like HiveOS, please run:
sudo -s
ldconfig /hive/lib/
wget http://www.awesomeminer.com/download/setup/awesomeminer-remoteagent.tar.xz
tar xvJf awesomeminer-remoteagent.tar.xz
cd awesomeminer-remoteagent
./service-install.sh

Please also see the guide for Remote Agent on Linux:
https://support.awesomeminer.com/support/solutions/articles/35000086210-remote-agent-for-linux
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi @Sven, I don't know if I've touched something, but something strange happens to me. Creating a Pool Group now I don't get the nicehash and zergpool AL-GOS that I have selected. I had them selected but now they do not appear in the list, only the coins that I have been adding over time appear.

I was working measuring AL-GOS for that I use a pool group and there I select the nicehash or zergpool protocol and then in the miner it indicated to mine that pool group.

I think I have not touched anything, but now when creating a pool group nicehash and zergpool do not appear and I have them selected in the profit with their wallet. A while ago I changed from one to another, and after a while when I went to change they did not appear to me.

I even have groups created that tell me in the list that I have 5 active pools, but when I enter I don't see nicehash or zergpool, it's something strange. I am sorry I cannot provide you with more details to reproduce it.

I add, I look at each miner in the "profit swtiching" tab, all the al-gos of nicehash and zergpool appear, but they still do not appear to select in "pool group"

The last thing I did before was to give priority to the different protocols that nicehash was using, 0 higher privilege, 1 lower privilege. It may be that you had two protocols with the same level of privilege. It's the only thing I've done weird today, and then the failure.
Can you please go to the Options dialog, Profit Switching section. Is "Make predefined pools available everyone" enabled? When enabled, you should be able to see Nicehash and Zergpool in all locations where Awesome Miner lists the pools.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
is it possible to switch between 2 gpu miners I have created in awesome miner?  I figure this would be a profit switching thing but I need to be able to manually control the profit switching parameters which doesn't seem possible. 

I mine a coin that uses 3 algorithms.  1 algo for GPU, 1 for CPU, and 1 for ASIC and it rotates so 38% of the time it's GPU, 60% CPU, and 2% ASIC.

So one miner I made mines that 3-Algo coin and I made a second miner to mine other things when the first miner is not mining it's 38%.

The problem right now is that both miners just run equally so I don't get the full hashrate on the 3-algo coin because the other miner is stealing resources.

Thank you for any help.
Thanks for your question. This sounds like a very special case.

If the first mining software is doing active mining only 38% of the time, the main question is how Awesome Miner can know when it's mining and when it isn't mining. Is the mining software running all the time, but only get work from the pool 38% of the time, resulting in a hashrate above zero for 38% of the time and a hashrate of 0H/s the remaining time?

If it's possible to define a criteria from an Awesome Miner point of view, it should be possible to use the rules in Awesome Miner (Options dialog, Rules section). You could have one rule looking for the scenario when to start the second miner and another rule to look for the scenario when to stop the second miner. The Miner Statistics trigger can be used on the first miner to detect hashrate levels for example.
jr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 2
Hi @Sven, I don't know if I've touched something, but something strange happens to me. Creating a Pool Group now I don't get the nicehash and zergpool AL-GOS that I have selected. I had them selected but now they do not appear in the list, only the coins that I have been adding over time appear.

I was working measuring AL-GOS for that I use a pool group and there I select the nicehash or zergpool protocol and then in the miner it indicated to mine that pool group.

I think I have not touched anything, but now when creating a pool group nicehash and zergpool do not appear and I have them selected in the profit with their wallet. A while ago I changed from one to another, and after a while when I went to change they did not appear to me.

I even have groups created that tell me in the list that I have 5 active pools, but when I enter I don't see nicehash or zergpool, it's something strange. I am sorry I cannot provide you with more details to reproduce it.

I add, I look at each miner in the "profit swtiching" tab, all the al-gos of nicehash and zergpool appear, but they still do not appear to select in "pool group"

The last thing I did before was to give priority to the different protocols that nicehash was using, 0 higher privilege, 1 lower privilege. It may be that you had two protocols with the same level of privilege. It's the only thing I've done weird today, and then the failure.
jr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 2
Hi @Sven, I don't know if I've touched something, but something strange happens to me. Creating a Pool Group now I don't get the nicehash and zergpool AL-GOS that I have selected. I had them selected but now they do not appear in the list, only the coins that I have been adding over time appear.

I was working measuring AL-GOS for that I use a pool group and there I select the nicehash or zergpool protocol and then in the miner it indicated to mine that pool group.

I think I have not touched anything, but now when creating a pool group nicehash and zergpool do not appear and I have them selected in the profit with their wallet. A while ago I changed from one to another, and after a while when I went to change they did not appear to me.

I even have groups created that tell me in the list that I have 5 active pools, but when I enter I don't see nicehash or zergpool, it's something strange. I am sorry I cannot provide you with more details to reproduce it.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031
is it possible to switch between 2 gpu miners I have created in awesome miner?  I figure this would be a profit switching thing but I need to be able to manually control the profit switching parameters which doesn't seem possible. 

I mine a coin that uses 3 algorithms.  1 algo for GPU, 1 for CPU, and 1 for ASIC and it rotates so 38% of the time it's GPU, 60% CPU, and 2% ASIC.

So one miner I made mines that 3-Algo coin and I made a second miner to mine other things when the first miner is not mining it's 38%.

The problem right now is that both miners just run equally so I don't get the full hashrate on the 3-algo coin because the other miner is stealing resources.

Thank you for any help.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Is it possible to make a guide on how to install AM on hiveos or raveos or another linex OS
To make everything work?
Step by step
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrike,

i have a difference in CPU temp only 1 rig. AM says 77°C and Coretemp and AMD Ryzen Master says it have 87°C. CPU is a Ryzen 5 2600x. On other rigs there are no problems (Ryzen 5 1600 temp is right, Ryzen 3 1200 temp is right and on all other Intel CPU´s temp is right)
There are multiple temperature sensors on the CPU, so it may not be the exact same we report as Ryzen Master reports. Awesome Miner prioritize the "CPU Core" and "CPU (Tdie)" sensors, but there are more sensors.

If you want, please check with the tool OpenHardwareMonitor where you will see the name of many of the CPU temperature sensors and the reported temperature for each of them.

I checked the temperature with OpenHardwareMonitor and it says only 89°C and some lower temps under 70°C and awesomeminer shows 79°C. This is only on the ryzen 5 2600x. Another rig with a ryzen 5 1600 shows 75°C in awesomeminer and 75°C in OpenHardwareMonitor. So there is something wrong.
For AMD CPUs, only have a Ryzen 3000-series to test with and I will investigate on that one a bit more.

Could you please also try with the older version called  "Open Hardware Monitor 0.8.0 Beta", available here:
https://openhardwaremonitor.org/downloads/

It would be interesting to see if that one reports differently.

Via Open Hardware Monitor you can also export as a report via the menu File -> Save Report. Can you please do this for the Ryzen 2600x system and send me via PM? Please also let me know the temperature you consider is correct for the time you created the report.

The numbers in Awesome Miner is for one of the reported CPU temperatures sensors (so Awesome Miner isn't making up anything here) but it may not be the sensor most relevant for this specific Ryzen CPU. With the report above I might be able to find out the name of the sensors that would make more sense to display.
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
Hi Patrike,

i have a difference in CPU temp only 1 rig. AM says 77°C and Coretemp and AMD Ryzen Master says it have 87°C. CPU is a Ryzen 5 2600x. On other rigs there are no problems (Ryzen 5 1600 temp is right, Ryzen 3 1200 temp is right and on all other Intel CPU´s temp is right)
There are multiple temperature sensors on the CPU, so it may not be the exact same we report as Ryzen Master reports. Awesome Miner prioritize the "CPU Core" and "CPU (Tdie)" sensors, but there are more sensors.

If you want, please check with the tool OpenHardwareMonitor where you will see the name of many of the CPU temperature sensors and the reported temperature for each of them.

I checked the temperature with OpenHardwareMonitor and it says only 89°C and some lower temps under 70°C and awesomeminer shows 79°C. This is only on the ryzen 5 2600x. Another rig with a ryzen 5 1600 shows 75°C in awesomeminer and 75°C in OpenHardwareMonitor. So there is something wrong.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrike,

i have a difference in CPU temp only 1 rig. AM says 77°C and Coretemp and AMD Ryzen Master says it have 87°C. CPU is a Ryzen 5 2600x. On other rigs there are no problems (Ryzen 5 1600 temp is right, Ryzen 3 1200 temp is right and on all other Intel CPU´s temp is right)
There are multiple temperature sensors on the CPU, so it may not be the exact same we report as Ryzen Master reports. Awesome Miner prioritize the "CPU Core" and "CPU (Tdie)" sensors, but there are more sensors.

If you want, please check with the tool OpenHardwareMonitor where you will see the name of many of the CPU temperature sensors and the reported temperature for each of them.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrike,

i want to ask you again about the AM-Firmware: is the Firmware for the S17e and T17e still in Development? and are there Plans for the S19 and S19Pro?!

BR Ralf
Hi Ralf,

I was hoping to have a better answer for you, but the S17e/T17e firmware has been delayed. I've been talking to our firmware partner on this and the S17e/T17e firmware is still in development and will be the next supported firmware.
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
Hi Patrike,

i have a difference in CPU temp only 1 rig. AM says 77°C and Coretemp and AMD Ryzen Master says it have 87°C. CPU is a Ryzen 5 2600x. On other rigs there are no problems (Ryzen 5 1600 temp is right, Ryzen 3 1200 temp is right and on all other Intel CPU´s temp is right)
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
Hi Patrike,

i want to ask you again about the AM-Firmware: is the Firmware for the S17e and T17e still in Development? and are there Plans for the S19 and S19Pro?!

BR Ralf
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
@Patrike, Please add a "MegaMec" algo for T-Rex 18.1 miner. Algo param name is "megamec"
Regards
I've added this algorithm for T-Rex and WildRig.
legendary
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
@Patrike, Please add a "MegaMec" algo for T-Rex 18.1 miner. Algo param name is "megamec"
Regards
legendary
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
New project for miners, absolute free, this project development "ETHlargement" - EthereumPill release
Support Algo: Ethash/KawPow/ProgPow
@narousberg

Can you please delete the Link in your quoted post you have done , because its a Malware download Link !
Just to be sure nobody will click on it and gets infected with that Shady Software.
You can read more about in my Thread here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55372348

Regards Lafu
deleted, thanks for warning!
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 3213
New project for miners, absolute free, this project development "ETHlargement" - EthereumPill release
Support Algo: Ethash/KawPow/ProgPow
@narousberg

Can you please delete the Link in your quoted post you have done , because its a Malware download Link !
Just to be sure nobody will click on it and gets infected with that Shady Software.
You can read more about in my Thread here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55372348

Regards Lafu
legendary
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
@Patrike Looks like i am found a problem with Cortex data displaying. AM use for Cortex algo name "Cortex", but must be "CuckooCycleCortex"
WhatToMine API call "https://whattomine.com/coins/329.json" send responce:
Code:
{"id":329,"name":"Cortex","tag":"CTXC","algorithm":"CuckooCycleCortex","block_time":"13.4344","block_reward":7.0,"block_reward24":7.0,"block_reward3":7.0,"block_reward7":7.0,"last_block":2573695,"difficulty":119112.0,"difficulty24":119049.223744292,"difficulty3":120360.139721957,"difficulty7":119042.176914675,"nethash":8866,"exchange_rate":7.93e-06,"exchange_rate24":7.90119148936163e-06,"exchange_rate3":8.06197634575145e-06,"exchange_rate7":8.08499978309983e-06,"exchange_rate_vol":5.80696497,"exchange_rate_curr":"BTC","market_cap":"$22,625,404","pool_fee":"1.675859","estimated_rewards":"15.082730","btc_revenue":"0.00011961","revenue":"$1.37","cost":"$0.86","profit":"$0.50","status":"Active","lagging":false,"testing":false,"listed":false,"timestamp":1602595861}
I have overriden default "Cortex" coin data with this responce and now displaying of Cortex prce is stable. Hope you fix this in next releases. Regards
Awesome Miner should already do this mapping automatically since a few months ago. The WhatToMine algorithm name "CuckooCycleCortex" is mapped to "Cortex" in Awesome Miner.

Without any manual mapping, isn't CTXC listed as Cortex in the Coins tab?
its listed in coins tab and was always present in coins tab, but before i have overriden the Cortex data was unstable. Before override, price information was displayed only shortly and after undefined periods. Mostly price/network/diff was empty and that was a big problem for profit switching process. Now is stable and i can add Cortex to profit switching list together with other coins. I wrote before about this strange behavior.
Pages:
Jump to: