[Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 87.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: MoparMiningLLC on July 28, 2020, 08:41:01 PM

anyone using an innosilicon A6 LTCMaster? I cannot get AM to read that it is even on my network.

edit: I finally got it to see it - it was the port, it wasnt searching port 8100

So, then I got it added but the API access is denied.

I tried the instructions of using telnet but cant get past a certain point - I can get up to where it tells me to edit the config but when I run the command provided the config does not open for me to edit.

Let me state this - this is my first Innosilicon miner.

I don't have too much experience with Innosilicon miners. What you need to do is to use a file editor available on the Linux system on the miner. Unfortunately only 'vi' is available as far as I know and that one is a bit complicated.
Run:
vi /home/inno_py/inno_config.py
You will have to press the 'i' key to be able to make modifications to the file after you opened it. Once you made the changes, you need to press 'ESC' followed by ':wq' (as in Write and Quit).

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: Marvell2 on July 27, 2020, 10:53:03 PM

Quote from: patrike on July 27, 2020, 04:11:53 PM

Quote from: Marvell2 on July 27, 2020, 10:52:17 AM

why do i get mining interface offline when the card is mining and awesomeminer agent is running? its happening now on phoeniexminer

"Interface offline" indicates that Awesome Miner doesn't get any monitoring information from the mining software. Can you please select the miner and send me the API report (toolbar: Tools -> API Report), and I can verify if Phoenix Miner is giving any updates.

Do you see any error messages in the Phoenix Miner window when it's starting?

thats the api report

Version: 7.8.4 (40)
API command: miner_getstat2

I see zero errors in phoeniexminer

Thanks for the details. This indicates PhoenixMiner doesn't respond anything to the monitoring requests.

I don't have any solution to this, but based on previous experience it might make sense to check if this issue only happens when you run the mining with many mining devices. Do you get the same issue if you start Phoenix Miner with a single GPU?

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: slysir on July 27, 2020, 05:23:01 PM

Quote from: patrike on July 27, 2020, 03:19:39 PM

Quote from: slysir on July 26, 2020, 06:12:35 AM

How to show correct price for BEAM? Coin tab shows Revenue $21,779. Coin properties appear to be correct.

When I'm looking at Beam from WhatToMine right now, it looks fine and a hashrate of 50H/s gives ~$2.7/day. Are you using all default values in the Coin Properties? Do you still experience this issue or was it only temporary?

In the 'Miners' Tab BEAM coin shows $0.00 per day

In the 'Coins' Tab BEAM is at the top of the list when sorting by Revenue at $961,115 and using the Default Coin Properties values:

Difficulty: 26,530,270.00
Block reward: 40.0
Exchange rate: 0.00003320 BTC
Block time 60 s
Calculation: Difficulty, Block reward and Block time

What is the hashrate you configured (Profile hashrate)?
Please also select Beam on the Coins tab, right click and select "Open calculator on WhatToMine.com". This will make it possible to compare the revenue calculators.

Marvell2

full member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 132

Quote from: NCarter84 on July 29, 2020, 07:52:20 AM

Quote from: Marvell2 on July 29, 2020, 12:02:36 AM

yet another issue

trying a new pool Ziliqua and Etheruem

PhoenixMiner.exe -pool stratum1+tcp://eu.ezil.me:5555 -proto 2 -wal 0xa57EeFabb76Bfd1E9E6ee606999b76BD123aFe32.zil1lnren9q53zp4a3rr6zx4f3p53v3nuyq0 qgey5f -worker WORKER

thats the - wal address

Awesomeminer for some reason removes the seccond part zil1lnren9q53zp4a3rr6zx4f3p53v3nuyq0qgey5f from the address so i cannot connect to the pool. Why won't the miner just respect the full wallet address i placed in the wallet

why is it stripping out and using just the 0xa57EeFabb76Bfd1E9E6ee606999b76BD123aFe32 ? and how do i disable that ? I tried removing it completely and adding -wal 0xa57EeFabb76Bfd1E9E6ee606999b76BD123aFe32.zil1lnren9q53zp4a3rr6zx4f3p53v3nuyq0 qgey5f
as a command line option and now nothing is used.

Mine works fine... But, I use Team Red Miner over that phoney Phoenix miner.

you put the whole wallet address in the account textbox?

NCarter84

jr. member

Activity: 195

Merit: 4

Quote from: Marvell2 on July 29, 2020, 12:02:36 AM

yet another issue

trying a new pool Ziliqua and Etheruem

PhoenixMiner.exe -pool stratum1+tcp://eu.ezil.me:5555 -proto 2 -wal 0xa57EeFabb76Bfd1E9E6ee606999b76BD123aFe32.zil1lnren9q53zp4a3rr6zx4f3p53v3nuyq0 qgey5f -worker WORKER

thats the - wal address

Awesomeminer for some reason removes the seccond part zil1lnren9q53zp4a3rr6zx4f3p53v3nuyq0qgey5f from the address so i cannot connect to the pool. Why won't the miner just respect the full wallet address i placed in the wallet

why is it stripping out and using just the 0xa57EeFabb76Bfd1E9E6ee606999b76BD123aFe32 ? and how do i disable that ? I tried removing it completely and adding -wal 0xa57EeFabb76Bfd1E9E6ee606999b76BD123aFe32.zil1lnren9q53zp4a3rr6zx4f3p53v3nuyq0 qgey5f
as a command line option and now nothing is used.

Mine works fine... But, I use Team Red Miner over that phoney Phoenix miner.

Marvell2

full member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 132

yet another issue

trying a new pool Ziliqua and Etheruem

PhoenixMiner.exe -pool stratum1+tcp://eu.ezil.me:5555 -proto 2 -wal 0xa57EeFabb76Bfd1E9E6ee606999b76BD123aFe32.zil1lnren9q53zp4a3rr6zx4f3p53v3nuyq0 qgey5f -worker WORKER

thats the - wal address

Awesomeminer for some reason removes the seccond part zil1lnren9q53zp4a3rr6zx4f3p53v3nuyq0qgey5f from the address so i cannot connect to the pool. Why won't the miner just respect the full wallet address i placed in the wallet

why is it stripping out and using just the 0xa57EeFabb76Bfd1E9E6ee606999b76BD123aFe32 ? and how do i disable that ? I tried removing it completely and adding -wal 0xa57EeFabb76Bfd1E9E6ee606999b76BD123aFe32.zil1lnren9q53zp4a3rr6zx4f3p53v3nuyq0 qgey5f
as a command line option and now nothing is used.

MoparMiningLLC

legendary

Activity: 2254

Merit: 2419

EIN: 82-3893490

anyone using an innosilicon A6 LTCMaster? I cannot get AM to read that it is even on my network.

edit: I finally got it to see it - it was the port, it wasnt searching port 8100

So, then I got it added but the API access is denied.

I tried the instructions of using telnet but cant get past a certain point - I can get up to where it tells me to edit the config but when I run the command provided the config does not open for me to edit.

Let me state this - this is my first Innosilicon miner.

Marvell2

full member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 132

Quote from: patrike on July 27, 2020, 04:11:53 PM

Quote from: Marvell2 on July 27, 2020, 10:52:17 AM

why do i get mining interface offline when the card is mining and awesomeminer agent is running? its happening now on phoeniexminer

"Interface offline" indicates that Awesome Miner doesn't get any monitoring information from the mining software. Can you please select the miner and send me the API report (toolbar: Tools -> API Report), and I can verify if Phoenix Miner is giving any updates.

Do you see any error messages in the Phoenix Miner window when it's starting?

thats the api report

Version: 7.8.4 (40)
API command: miner_getstat2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
46
false
0

-cclock 1300 -cvddc 825 -mclock 1800 -tstop 75 -hstats 2 -mt 2
-wdog 1 -rmode 0 -cdm 2 -cdmport 4028
POOL: stratum+tcp://eth-us-west1.nanopool.org:9999, WAL: 0xa57EeFabb76Bfd1E9E6ee606999b76BD123aFe32.91, PASS: x, PROTO: 2, ALLPOOLS: 1

==========

4020
2020-07-27T18:10:50.6853188Z
1
197034

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
DESKTOP-IE1C2TE
false
false
34905
262453
4.8

Intel Pentium G4400
2
1

903.33660888671875
3312.234130859375

1003.7073364257813
3312.234130859375

38
48

32
46

30
48

2.3219823837280273
100

3.4055769443511963
100

1.2383878231048584
100

1.1713352203369141
18.590593338012695

0.37799051403999329
17.793333053588867

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
MSI
false
5
0
0

134.12502283912
136

0.831
0.831

1265
1273

1800
1800

69
74

99
99

0
1656

30
30

PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_731F&SUBSYS_38161462&REV_C1_6&1A84F085&0&000000DBA

2704887808
5841481728

Local Disk (C:\)
153496141824
239462248448

20.4.2
445.87
1C1B0DA917AA
false

false

true

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
Executing
Disconnected
false
false

None
1
false

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
46
Managed
91 Amd Test Box
true
PhoenixMiner
Disabled
0
Ethereum
5
3
0
-mi 14 -wdog 0 -cclock 1230 -cvddc 755 -mclock 1870 -tstop 75 -tstart 60 -hstats 2 -tt -30 -mt 2..

trying this stable
-wd 0 -gt 100 -cclock 1550 -cvddc 900 -mclock 1900 -tstop 75 -tstart 60 -hstats 2

was stable on all
-cclock 1340 -cvddc 900 -mclock 1820 -tstop 75 -tstart 60 -hstats 2

try 810 on last now to lower power use and lsightly higer meme
-cclock 1340 -cvddc 825,825,750 -mclock 1800,1840,1840 -tstop 75 -tstart 60 -hstats 2
None

true
91
22
false
false
Single
-1

1C1B0DA917AA
false

true
52
Single
848
-1
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

-cclock 1300 -cvddc 825 -mclock 1800 -tstop 75 -hstats 2 -mt 2

false

false

false

false

ConsoleFormat
Normal

true
false

false

false

0
false
0

true
PhoenixMiner

Ethereum
Disabled
false

2020-07-27T18:10:49.5747578Z

false

false
true
116
Single
false
-1
Single
All

false
false
true

1
0
2

true
false
AMD ethereum Nanopool -5700
false
true
true

false
0
Single
false
0
Single
1

I see zero errors in phoeniexminer

slysir

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

Quote from: patrike on July 27, 2020, 03:19:39 PM

Quote from: slysir on July 26, 2020, 06:12:35 AM

How to show correct price for BEAM? Coin tab shows Revenue $21,779. Coin properties appear to be correct.

When I'm looking at Beam from WhatToMine right now, it looks fine and a hashrate of 50H/s gives ~$2.7/day. Are you using all default values in the Coin Properties? Do you still experience this issue or was it only temporary?

In the 'Miners' Tab BEAM coin shows $0.00 per day

In the 'Coins' Tab BEAM is at the top of the list when sorting by Revenue at $961,115 and using the Default Coin Properties values:

Difficulty: 26,530,270.00
Block reward: 40.0
Exchange rate: 0.00003320 BTC
Block time 60 s
Calculation: Difficulty, Block reward and Block time

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: Marvell2 on July 27, 2020, 10:52:17 AM

why do i get mining interface offline when the card is mining and awesomeminer agent is running? its happening now on phoeniexminer

"Interface offline" indicates that Awesome Miner doesn't get any monitoring information from the mining software. Can you please select the miner and send me the API report (toolbar: Tools -> API Report), and I can verify if Phoenix Miner is giving any updates.

Do you see any error messages in the Phoenix Miner window when it's starting?

MoparMiningLLC

legendary

Activity: 2254

Merit: 2419

EIN: 82-3893490

Quote from: patrike on July 27, 2020, 03:14:40 PM

Quote from: MoparMiningLLC on July 25, 2020, 09:22:51 PM

all my profit profiles disappeared and when i go to edit them there is only one to select from... Ethereum.

it is like this for all my miners/rigs

Please open the Options dialog, Algorithms section and see if you have unchecked most algorithms. Your profit profile will only list the algorithms that are enabled on a global level (Options dialog, Algorithms section).

yes that was it - though I never unchecked it. i was sitting here watching it and all of a sudden all my miners went to not showing their power usage or profit margin - but this fixed it. not sure how they got all unchecked.

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: slysir on July 26, 2020, 06:12:35 AM

How to show correct price for BEAM? Coin tab shows Revenue $21,779. Coin properties appear to be correct.

When I'm looking at Beam from WhatToMine right now, it looks fine and a hashrate of 50H/s gives ~$2.7/day. Are you using all default values in the Coin Properties? Do you still experience this issue or was it only temporary?

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: MoparMiningLLC on July 25, 2020, 09:22:51 PM

all my profit profiles disappeared and when i go to edit them there is only one to select from... Ethereum.

it is like this for all my miners/rigs

Please open the Options dialog, Algorithms section and see if you have unchecked most algorithms. Your profit profile will only list the algorithms that are enabled on a global level (Options dialog, Algorithms section).

patrike

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1094

Quote from: joseph32 on July 22, 2020, 09:53:10 PM

Quote from: patrike on July 22, 2020, 07:29:26 AM

Quote from: joseph32 on July 21, 2020, 12:16:06 PM

Hi Patrik,

question, or maybe a suggestion

Is it possible in the rules to set some trigger for a rig A, but the action (like a start/stop miner command) is for another rig B? Or maybe multiple rigs B, C, D, .....?

If this is not possible right now, it would be awesome if you could do that.

Thanks for the suggestion. This isn't possible today.

Can you give an example of when this might be useful? This would be of help for me to understand what's missing today. Thanks!

Hey Patrik,

here are two examples for my own benefit.

I have a few watercooled rigs with 2 seperated rigs in 1 water-loop. If for whatever reason the main-rig turns off, there is no waterflow anymore and I have to shutdown the second rig too. Right now that shutdown is managed by a smart socket, but if AM could handle that with just a rule and much faster, it would be awesome.

I also have multiple containers, running each 4 rigs inside, but with just 1 power line per container. If the main-rig including the power for the containers airflow turns off, I have to shut down the other 3 rigs to protect them of overheating. AM could handle that even faster than any smart socket.

I think this option can be useful for other miners too, to protect rigs in a better way without using external stuff like smart sockets or so. How could this be done? One idea would be in the rules -> actions -> "miner command" for example another line which is already set to "this miner/group", but I also can choose other miners or groups. But maybe you will find a better way like always

Quote from: sxemini on July 23, 2020, 08:08:14 AM

And patrike it is possible at the moment to shutdown many rigs if one rig goes down. You can set a rule that push an .cmd file with start/stop api commands or shutdown.

Much work at the moment, but it is possible. An easier way would be nice, but not for the strange scenario joseph32 explained.

Thanks for all feedback. I think it would be quite easy to extent the rule concept to let you manually define for which specific miners the actions should be performed. I will look into this and it can hopefully be supported soon.

Marvell2

full member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 132

why do i get mining interface offline when the card is mining and awesomeminer agent is running? its happening now on phoeniexminer

slysir

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

How to show correct price for BEAM? Coin tab shows Revenue $21,779. Coin properties appear to be correct.

MoparMiningLLC

legendary

Activity: 2254

Merit: 2419

EIN: 82-3893490

all my profit profiles disappeared and when i go to edit them there is only one to select from... Ethereum.

it is like this for all my miners/rigs

Akif52

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: joseph32 on July 23, 2020, 12:08:53 PM

@sx. For the few summer months yes. But for the cold months and mainly for the winter months I need it that way. But your idea is nice and much better than mine and maybe much easier to do. A rule-action to force a start/stop/whatever command to multiple rigs or groups.

Yes, each case needs individual adjustment. Wink

joseph32

member

Activity: 418

Merit: 21

@sx. For the few summer months yes. But for the cold months and mainly for the winter months I need it that way. But your idea is nice and much better than mine and maybe much easier to do. A rule-action to force a start/stop/whatever command to multiple rigs or groups.

sxemini

member

Activity: 1558

Merit: 69

Quote from: joseph32 on July 22, 2020, 09:53:10 PM

Quote from: patrike on July 22, 2020, 07:29:26 AM

Quote from: joseph32 on July 21, 2020, 12:16:06 PM

Hi Patrik,

question, or maybe a suggestion

Is it possible in the rules to set some trigger for a rig A, but the action (like a start/stop miner command) is for another rig B? Or maybe multiple rigs B, C, D, .....?

If this is not possible right now, it would be awesome if you could do that.

Thanks for the suggestion. This isn't possible today.

Can you give an example of when this might be useful? This would be of help for me to understand what's missing today. Thanks!

Hey Patrik,

here are two examples for my own benefit.

I have a few watercooled rigs with 2 seperated rigs in 1 water-loop. If for whatever reason the main-rig turns off, there is no waterflow anymore and I have to shutdown the second rig too. Right now that shutdown is managed by a smart socket, but if AM could handle that with just a rule and much faster, it would be awesome.

I also have multiple containers, running each 4 rigs inside, but with just 1 power line per container. If the main-rig including the power for the containers airflow turns off, I have to shut down the other 3 rigs to protect them of overheating. AM could handle that even faster than any smart socket.

I think this option can be useful for other miners too, to protect rigs in a better way without using external stuff like smart sockets or so. How could this be done? One idea would be in the rules -> actions -> "miner command" for example another line which is already set to "this miner/group", but I also can choose other miners or groups. But maybe you will find a better way like always

it is maybe better to make the water flow separately and don´t let control a rig the waterpump. The same with airflow, it make no sense to control the airflow or waterflow for multiple rigs with one rig.
You look for the wrong solution my friend.

And patrike it is possible at the moment to shutdown many rigs if one rig goes down. You can set a rule that push an .cmd file with start/stop api commands or shutdown.

Much work at the moment, but it is possible. An easier way would be nice, but not for the strange scenario joseph32 explained.

Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 87. (Read 703113 times)