[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 134.

windjc

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1070

Quote from: teknohog on September 14, 2016, 01:15:06 PM

Quote from: windjc on September 14, 2016, 01:03:54 PM

Quote from: teknohog on September 14, 2016, 12:34:54 PM

Quote from: windjc on September 14, 2016, 12:03:48 PM

Its like the word "berry" somehow cuts at the very nature of bitcointalk users. Some weird universal relationship.

It's a childish name for a high tech product, just like "google" or "twitter".
It has a weird technical term "bool", just like "bit" in Bitcoin.
The "berry" part is just unbearable in a respectable, established brand, just like "burberry".

so childish names like google and twitter are ok, but childish names like berry aren't? not following logic...

It's irony, I'm trying to debunk some of the common arguments for name change.

Gotcha. And I totally agree. In fact I would argue that the vast majority (all?) of people who won't invest because of the name, wouldn't have anyway.

teknohog

sr. member

Activity: 520

Merit: 253

555

Quote from: windjc on September 14, 2016, 01:03:54 PM

Quote from: teknohog on September 14, 2016, 12:34:54 PM

Quote from: windjc on September 14, 2016, 12:03:48 PM

Its like the word "berry" somehow cuts at the very nature of bitcointalk users. Some weird universal relationship.

It's a childish name for a high tech product, just like "google" or "twitter".
It has a weird technical term "bool", just like "bit" in Bitcoin.
The "berry" part is just unbearable in a respectable, established brand, just like "burberry".

so childish names like google and twitter are ok, but childish names like berry aren't? not following logic...

It's irony, I'm trying to debunk some of the common arguments for name change.

windjc

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1070

Quote from: teknohog on September 14, 2016, 12:34:54 PM

Quote from: windjc on September 14, 2016, 12:03:48 PM

Its like the word "berry" somehow cuts at the very nature of bitcointalk users. Some weird universal relationship.

It's a childish name for a high tech product, just like "google" or "twitter".
It has a weird technical term "bool", just like "bit" in Bitcoin.
The "berry" part is just unbearable in a respectable, established brand, just like "burberry".

so childish names like google and twitter are ok, but childish names like berry aren't? not following logic...

1blockologist

sr. member

Activity: 505

Merit: 250

Activist Investor

Quote from: teknohog on September 14, 2016, 12:34:54 PM

Quote from: windjc on September 14, 2016, 12:03:48 PM

Its like the word "berry" somehow cuts at the very nature of bitcointalk users. Some weird universal relationship.

It's a childish name for a high tech product, just like "google" or "twitter".
It has a weird technical term "bool", just like "bit" in Bitcoin.
The "berry" part is just unbearable in a respectable, established brand, just like "burberry".

and might just be fun enough to get mainstream adoption!

I'm just looking forward to trying to keep a straight face through the congressional hearing

teknohog

sr. member

Activity: 520

Merit: 253

555

Quote from: windjc on September 14, 2016, 12:03:48 PM

Its like the word "berry" somehow cuts at the very nature of bitcointalk users. Some weird universal relationship.

It's a childish name for a high tech product, just like "google" or "twitter".
It has a weird technical term "bool", just like "bit" in Bitcoin.
The "berry" part is just unbearable in a respectable, established brand, just like "burberry".

shojayxt

legendary

Activity: 896

Merit: 1001

Quote from: windjc on September 14, 2016, 12:03:48 PM

Quote from: jwinterm on September 14, 2016, 11:55:56 AM

Cheesus do we really need to hash this out again. How about boolrune, or honeybool, or boolshit, or maybe just leave it alone Tongue

Lol. It is rather hilarious at this point isn't it?

Its like the word "berry" somehow cuts at the very nature of bitcointalk users. Some weird universal relationship.

Ha ha. That's funny but true.

The name is fine.

windjc

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1070

Quote from: jwinterm on September 14, 2016, 11:55:56 AM

Cheesus do we really need to hash this out again. How about boolrune, or honeybool, or boolshit, or maybe just leave it alone Tongue

Lol. It is rather hilarious at this point isn't it?

Its like the word "berry" somehow cuts at the very nature of bitcointalk users. Some weird universal relationship.

jwinterm

legendary

Activity: 3136

Merit: 1116

Cheesus do we really need to hash this out again. How about boolrune, or honeybool, or boolshit, or maybe just leave it alone Tongue

DieJohnny

legendary

Activity: 1639

Merit: 1006

Quote from: 520Bit on September 14, 2016, 10:34:49 AM

How about we rename Boolberry to Boolcoin?

Bool reprents the 0 or 1. It is more or less like Bit.

If you say one Bit, it would be a 0 or an 1.

If you say one Bool, it would be a 0 or an 1 as well.

Does it make sense?

Anything but Boolberry.... boolean is named after Boole, so how about BooleBit

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

I get some reports from users which are unable to connect to https://bbr.suprnova.cc after mining sucessfully.

Your scratchpad.bin is outdated, get a new one from here: https://bbr.suprnova.cc/scratchpad.bin

It seems not all clients download them reliably.

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

How about we rename Boolberry to Boolcoin?

Bool reprents the 0 or 1. It is more or less like Bit.

If you say one Bit, it would be a 0 or an 1.

If you say one Bool, it would be a 0 or an 1 as well.

Does it make sense?

pacers101

member

Activity: 73

Merit: 10

Quote from: ocminer on September 14, 2016, 07:35:43 AM

Quote from: pacers101 on September 13, 2016, 10:28:44 PM

I get so many booos! it is frustrating. why do I get so many booos. I run on mbk, I tried supernova, same stuff. I got a r7 370 and 2 cpu's but my share % is in the 70-75% range. I should be in the 800 khash range but I running in the 300 khash range because of all the boos and disconnects. this is very frustrating.

That only happens when your scratchpad.bin is outdated usually, did you download a fresh copy off my server before starting to mine?

https://bbr.suprnova.cc/scratchpad.bin

I'll try that, thanks.

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: pacers101 on September 13, 2016, 10:28:44 PM

I get so many booos! it is frustrating. why do I get so many booos. I run on mbk, I tried supernova, same stuff. I got a r7 370 and 2 cpu's but my share % is in the 70-75% range. I should be in the 800 khash range but I running in the 300 khash range because of all the boos and disconnects. this is very frustrating.

That only happens when your scratchpad.bin is outdated usually, did you download a fresh copy off my server before starting to mine?

https://bbr.suprnova.cc/scratchpad.bin

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Quote from: pufuletz on September 14, 2016, 05:28:49 AM

honest question:
is the dev of this coin (zoidberg?) gonna stick around for good this time or bail if the price tanks or stagnates for a while again?

Zoidberg wants this coin to change human being. More privacy than Bitcoin.

pufuletz

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

honest question:
is the dev of this coin (zoidberg?) gonna stick around for good this time or bail if the price tanks or stagnates for a while again?

mirny

legendary

Activity: 1108

Merit: 1005

Quote from: 1blockologist on September 14, 2016, 01:45:42 AM

Quote from: mirny on September 14, 2016, 12:17:17 AM

Quote from: teknohog on September 12, 2016, 06:32:02 PM

Quote from: clintar2 on September 12, 2016, 05:01:27 PM

Please use my pool code. Modules are updated to use newer versions of node.
https://github.com/clintar/cryptonote-universal-pool.git

Thanks, it's working now Grin

There was only a small complaint about missing bignum.node upon startup, but that was an easy thing to fix with "npm install bignum".

Hello,
i had same problem at first it needed async, then bignum, I sort this out, but now I'm not able to install
multihashing at all. I tried nodejs v0.1, 4, 6, 7, different versions of npm, but any of those won't work.
Can you help me with that?
cheers

nodejs 7 already out? man people weren't exaggerating about the 6 months life cycle of javascript frameworks

I found some pre-release somewhere

1blockologist

sr. member

Activity: 505

Merit: 250

Activist Investor

Quote from: mirny on September 14, 2016, 12:17:17 AM

Quote from: teknohog on September 12, 2016, 06:32:02 PM

Quote from: clintar2 on September 12, 2016, 05:01:27 PM

Please use my pool code. Modules are updated to use newer versions of node.
https://github.com/clintar/cryptonote-universal-pool.git

Thanks, it's working now Grin

There was only a small complaint about missing bignum.node upon startup, but that was an easy thing to fix with "npm install bignum".

Hello,
i had same problem at first it needed async, then bignum, I sort this out, but now I'm not able to install
multihashing at all. I tried nodejs v0.1, 4, 6, 7, different versions of npm, but any of those won't work.
Can you help me with that?
cheers

nodejs 7 already out? man people weren't exaggerating about the 6 months life cycle of javascript frameworks

mirny

legendary

Activity: 1108

Merit: 1005

Quote from: teknohog on September 12, 2016, 06:32:02 PM

Quote from: clintar2 on September 12, 2016, 05:01:27 PM

Please use my pool code. Modules are updated to use newer versions of node.
https://github.com/clintar/cryptonote-universal-pool.git

Thanks, it's working now Grin

There was only a small complaint about missing bignum.node upon startup, but that was an easy thing to fix with "npm install bignum".

Hello,
i had same problem at first it needed async, then bignum, I sort this out, but now I'm not able to install
multihashing at all. I tried nodejs v0.1, 4, 6, 7, different versions of npm, but any of those won't work.
Can you help me with that?
cheers

pacers101

member

Activity: 73

Merit: 10

I get so many booos! it is frustrating. why do I get so many booos. I run on mbk, I tried supernova, same stuff. I got a r7 370 and 2 cpu's but my share % is in the 70-75% range. I should be in the 800 khash range but I running in the 300 khash range because of all the boos and disconnects. this is very frustrating.

clintar2

full member

Activity: 202

Merit: 104

Quote from: kohonez on September 13, 2016, 11:38:54 AM

I'm getting this message in my private pool :

Code:

2016-09-13 12:29:54 Error with transfer RPC request to wallet daemon {"code":"ECONNREFUSED","errno":"ECONNREFUSED","syscall":"connect"}
2016-09-13 12:29:54 Payments failed to send to [{"amount":10100000000000,"address":"1BHN*******************************m"},{"amount":97000000000000,"address":"1Eyo******************************B"},{"amount":100000000000,"address":"1AxQ******************************k"}] with paymentid:  
2016-09-13 12:29:54 Error with transfer RPC request to wallet daemon {"code":"ECONNREFUSED","errno":"ECONNREFUSED","syscall":"connect"}
2016-09-13 12:29:54 Could not retrieve wallet balance

i cant make automatic payments to workers Sad

my daemon and simplewallet starts with:

./boolbd --rpc-bind-ip my_ip_address --rpc-bind-port 10102
./simplewallet --wallet-file x --password "password" --daemon-address my_ip_address:10102 --rpc-bind-port 10103

anyone can help me?

Try to add

Code:

--rpc-bind-ip=127.0.0.1

Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 134. (Read 1210779 times)