[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 138.

@bb

full member

Activity: 137

Merit: 100

Quote from: V3n0m on September 11, 2016, 10:15:40 AM

Can Somebody clarify for me what this means when using the open cl miner - GPU (Share doesn't validate on CPU) are these being accepted or is there something I need to be doing

Seems you use wrong cuda toolkit version to compile or wrong kernel, default build is for maxwell architecture, if your gpu is kepler then use "make kepler", other architecture should use opencl version.

V3n0m

member

Activity: 67

Merit: 10

Can Somebody clarify for me what this means when using the open cl miner - GPU (Share doesn't validate on CPU) are these being accepted or is there something I need to be doing

.m.

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 260

Quote from: bitcoinuserz on September 09, 2016, 09:12:39 AM

Nice, so the development is ON?

Seems like 1blockologist has something useful to contribute.

@bb

full member

Activity: 137

Merit: 100

Quote from: 1blockologist on September 09, 2016, 10:45:35 PM

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on September 09, 2016, 04:47:21 PM

Quote from: mbk on September 09, 2016, 06:24:36 AM

....

Thanks for your work. Let's continue moving this way. Make commits to your repository so I and everybody else can review them. The most urgent task for me is to merge DB branch from the original repository to master. Daemon needs a lot of memory to run right now. That's not good for a decentralized system. I would prefer you to checkout DB branch and commit on top to make the review process simpler.

DB is really important task, and idea was to quickly implement basic db support in BBR using level_db, but to go forward problem is that level_db doesn't have transactions support, so we need to go with something like LMDB, which means to rewrite current code in db branch.

I guess this gonna take about 1 month of hard work. (but not a hard fork! don't be confused)

So if 1blockologist is about to implement something useful for BBR - implement working daemon with suitable memory consumption using LMDB would be good move.

Zoidberg

You're right, that would be a good move to do now instead of later. Monero team spent forever working on extra code to help people transition their current blockchain download into the database version, after having working database code for new users for months. Doing the LMDB stuff now while Boolberry doesn't have many users on the client would be ideal

But actually In later month there is a new KryptonotE coin alReady implement database COde, I thINk it would be good comparison to look at how the database implementation done.

1blockologist

sr. member

Activity: 505

Merit: 250

Activist Investor

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on September 09, 2016, 04:47:21 PM

Quote from: mbk on September 09, 2016, 06:24:36 AM

....

Thanks for your work. Let's continue moving this way. Make commits to your repository so I and everybody else can review them. The most urgent task for me is to merge DB branch from the original repository to master. Daemon needs a lot of memory to run right now. That's not good for a decentralized system. I would prefer you to checkout DB branch and commit on top to make the review process simpler.

DB is really important task, and idea was to quickly implement basic db support in BBR using level_db, but to go forward problem is that level_db doesn't have transactions support, so we need to go with something like LMDB, which means to rewrite current code in db branch.

I guess this gonna take about 1 month of hard work. (but not a hard fork! don't be confused)

So if 1blockologist is about to implement something useful for BBR - implement working daemon with suitable memory consumption using LMDB would be good move.

Zoidberg

You're right, that would be a good move to do now instead of later. Monero team spent forever working on extra code to help people transition their current blockchain download into the database version, after having working database code for new users for months. Doing the LMDB stuff now while Boolberry doesn't have many users on the client would be ideal

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Quote from: mbk on September 09, 2016, 06:24:36 AM

....

Thanks for your work. Let's continue moving this way. Make commits to your repository so I and everybody else can review them. The most urgent task for me is to merge DB branch from the original repository to master. Daemon needs a lot of memory to run right now. That's not good for a decentralized system. I would prefer you to checkout DB branch and commit on top to make the review process simpler.

DB is really important task, and idea was to quickly implement basic db support in BBR using level_db, but to go forward problem is that level_db doesn't have transactions support, so we need to go with something like LMDB, which means to rewrite current code in db branch.

I guess this gonna take about 1 month of hard work. (but not a hard fork! don't be confused)

So if 1blockologist is about to implement something useful for BBR - implement working daemon with suitable memory consumption using LMDB would be good move.

Zoidberg

1blockologist

sr. member

Activity: 505

Merit: 250

Activist Investor

Quote from: mbk on September 09, 2016, 06:24:36 AM

Quote from: 1blockologist on September 07, 2016, 12:05:51 AM

Quote from: mbk on September 05, 2016, 10:15:18 AM

Hi all,

I've got a number of private messages lately. I don't like private chats. It's better to give all answers here in public.

I'm trying to keep my pool online all the time cause I use it myself a bit. All pending payments are sent in all case. The only real DDOS attack was this August. It finished about a week ago. All connection issues should be resolved.

If you have problems with pool/miner apps post it here so you can get help from other guys who mine as well.

Regarding new development activities. You can count on me if some updates need to be deployed on the pool. Just keep development open so everybody can evaluate your proposals/code and give a feedback. Have any ideas how to handle possible forks? Post it here. Let's keep this discussion as open as possible.

I'm not going to actively participate in current discussion but I'll read all feedback.

You have 75% of the network and I have made the first commit the Boolberry project has seen in a year.

You are the longest chain, you can build from my source or not. At this point in time I am open to accepting pull requests from Zoidberg into the Blockchain Development Company repository, and further collaboration as he also understands the cryptonote codebase, but make no mistake, the choice is completely yours.

I have been attempting to reach out to all of the infrastructure of Boolberry, including your pool, to establish confidence in the project. A further announcement is incoming, but for now, I need all participants in the Boolberry project to understand their role in the network and work together, and you have a greatly disproportionate influence on the direction of the network. The code is on github.

Thanks for your work. Let's continue moving this way. Make commits to your repository so I and everybody else can review them. The most urgent task for me is to merge DB branch from the original repository to master. Daemon needs a lot of memory to run right now. That's not good for a decentralized system. I would prefer you to checkout DB branch and commit on top to make the review process simpler.

I'm actually pursuing an intermediary system: hosting a remote synced client and allowing people to connect their simplewallet to that. Can you help with that since you are already hosting a node server and full mining node, people need to understand that this still gives them no perks to privacy.

We will be promoting more decentralized efforts, but our immediate goal is getting BBR off of the exchanges, and we will upgrade that to promoting greater decentralized after.

bitcoinuserz

sr. member

Activity: 360

Merit: 250

Nice, so the development is ON?

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Quote from: criptix on September 08, 2016, 05:25:03 PM

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on September 08, 2016, 05:10:15 PM

Hi folk.

FYI: i've been contacted by 1blockologist user in the skype, he claim that he want to develop BBR.
At the moment i have no idea who is that person and what he intend to do actually.

Let's see if his work gonna be helpful.

Zoidberg.

Thanks for getting back.
I think a lot of people would appreciate it if you can collaborate at some level with 1blockologist if he is really genuinely developing bbr further.
You still are part of the handful people who really understands cryptonote in detail.

If you didnt see yet, he made a new thread for bbr.

It is good to see you showing up here again.

Do you want to handover BBR project like Satoshi ever did?

Handover it to the community makes the project more decentralized.

mbk

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: 1blockologist on September 07, 2016, 12:05:51 AM

Quote from: mbk on September 05, 2016, 10:15:18 AM

Hi all,

I've got a number of private messages lately. I don't like private chats. It's better to give all answers here in public.

I'm trying to keep my pool online all the time cause I use it myself a bit. All pending payments are sent in all case. The only real DDOS attack was this August. It finished about a week ago. All connection issues should be resolved.

If you have problems with pool/miner apps post it here so you can get help from other guys who mine as well.

Regarding new development activities. You can count on me if some updates need to be deployed on the pool. Just keep development open so everybody can evaluate your proposals/code and give a feedback. Have any ideas how to handle possible forks? Post it here. Let's keep this discussion as open as possible.

I'm not going to actively participate in current discussion but I'll read all feedback.

You have 75% of the network and I have made the first commit the Boolberry project has seen in a year.

You are the longest chain, you can build from my source or not. At this point in time I am open to accepting pull requests from Zoidberg into the Blockchain Development Company repository, and further collaboration as he also understands the cryptonote codebase, but make no mistake, the choice is completely yours.

I have been attempting to reach out to all of the infrastructure of Boolberry, including your pool, to establish confidence in the project. A further announcement is incoming, but for now, I need all participants in the Boolberry project to understand their role in the network and work together, and you have a greatly disproportionate influence on the direction of the network. The code is on github.

Thanks for your work. Let's continue moving this way. Make commits to your repository so I and everybody else can review them. The most urgent task for me is to merge DB branch from the original repository to master. Daemon needs a lot of memory to run right now. That's not good for a decentralized system. I would prefer you to checkout DB branch and commit on top to make the review process simpler.

Filin4eg

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

Quote from: qwep1 on September 07, 2016, 12:45:58 AM

miner dont work on 470 amd driver 16.8.3 Sad

everything working fine on RX470 8GB and driver 16.8.3 speed is near 1500 win8.1

1blockologist

sr. member

Activity: 505

Merit: 250

Activist Investor

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on September 08, 2016, 05:10:15 PM

Hi folk.

FYI: i've been contacted by 1blockologist user in the skype, he claim that he want to develop BBR.
At the moment i have no idea who is that person and what he intend to do actually.

Let's see if his work gonna be helpful.

Zoidberg.

Thank you Zoidberg

For questions and updates on the RUNE version of the daemon, please go here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16190745

kneim

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1000

Quote from: 1blockologist on September 08, 2016, 03:20:21 PM

Quote from: lethos3 on September 08, 2016, 01:55:49 PM

I don't see why not remove the 1% fee to the ghost dev then, not doing so would make the community consider you could be the same person or colluding together.

Thats an interesting perspective. Our conclusion was that existing miners can vote to remove the 1% fee already, so there was nothing contentious that we needed to do at this point in time (not that we wanted to, the point is that we don't consider CryptoZoidberg's absence a problem, it is a self inflicted problem of the community that the community can change by voting to remove the 1% subsidy for nothing). Although we will release information on how to do it, as it isn't very user friendly. We weren't actually aware of the 1% tax when we identified Boolberry for stewardship.

The database needs a hard fork, the mixin criteria may need a hard fork, the ringct will need a hard fork, those are things that will possibly be marginally contentious as is. So it would be better if CryptoZoidberg reappeared and collaborated with us, instead of reappearing and wondering where his 1% cash flow went.

criptix

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1145

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on September 08, 2016, 05:10:15 PM

Hi folk.

FYI: i've been contacted by 1blockologist user in the skype, he claim that he want to develop BBR.
At the moment i have no idea who is that person and what he intend to do actually.

Let's see if his work gonna be helpful.

Zoidberg.

Thanks for getting back.
I think a lot of people would appreciate it if you can collaborate at some level with 1blockologist if he is really genuinely developing bbr further.
You still are part of the handful people who really understands cryptonote in detail.

If you didnt see yet, he made a new thread for bbr.

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Hi folk.

FYI: i've been contacted by 1blockologist user in the skype, he claim that he want to develop BBR.
At the moment i have no idea who is that person and what he intend to do actually.

Let's see if his work gonna be helpful.

Zoidberg.

1blockologist

sr. member

Activity: 505

Merit: 250

Activist Investor

New announcement thread under Blockchain Development Company moderation, please refer to that thread for latest developments

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xbb-boolberry-attempt-at-grassroots-development-movement-bittrex-1611499

/r/boolberry is now also Blockchain Development Company moderation

Our primary focus around moderation is to let people and the market know that Boolberry development is active again, and provide confidence that it will continue quickly.

We are currently in a moderated thread, so it is the same standard that CryptoZoidberg has, and although my channels should be open places to talk about the project as well as criticism, there are now multiple places to express your opinions if you feel there is or will be chilled expression

1blockologist

sr. member

Activity: 505

Merit: 250

Activist Investor

Quote from: kneim on September 08, 2016, 09:39:41 AM

Quote from: 1blockologist on September 08, 2016, 09:08:42 AM

Quote from: ph4nt0m on September 08, 2016, 04:43:20 AM

Quote from: 1blockologist on September 08, 2016, 02:18:28 AM

Boolbd daemon version 0.3.1 and greater report to the network as a variant called RUNE. This is just a client name to differentiate from zoidberg clients on the network, the currency and project is still called Boolberry, but this will be used to easily see Blockchain Development Company code going forward

Thank you for your patience

When do you make it available for testing and production use?

I would like the owner Boolberry.com to accept my binaries, can you help me reach out to the owner of that site?

In the mean time, you can build from source https://github.com/BlockchainDevelopmentCompany/boolberry/ , although I understand that is not convenient, for now I want people to look at my code updates to see that nothing bad or breaking has been implemented before I make a big push on getting miners to update.

Did you have got any trust from the hitherto existing dev group?

I talked to CryptoZoidberg and he wanted to see new code from my group before giving an official endorsement. So that is what we are doing.

kneim

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1000

Quote from: 1blockologist on September 08, 2016, 09:08:42 AM

Quote from: ph4nt0m on September 08, 2016, 04:43:20 AM

Quote from: 1blockologist on September 08, 2016, 02:18:28 AM

Boolbd daemon version 0.3.1 and greater report to the network as a variant called RUNE. This is just a client name to differentiate from zoidberg clients on the network, the currency and project is still called Boolberry, but this will be used to easily see Blockchain Development Company code going forward

Thank you for your patience

When do you make it available for testing and production use?

I would like the owner Boolberry.com to accept my binaries, can you help me reach out to the owner of that site?

In the mean time, you can build from source https://github.com/BlockchainDevelopmentCompany/boolberry/ , although I understand that is not convenient, for now I want people to look at my code updates to see that nothing bad or breaking has been implemented before I make a big push on getting miners to update.

Did you have got any trust from the hitherto existing dev group?

1blockologist

sr. member

Activity: 505

Merit: 250

Activist Investor

Quote from: ph4nt0m on September 08, 2016, 04:43:20 AM

Quote from: 1blockologist on September 08, 2016, 02:18:28 AM

Boolbd daemon version 0.3.1 and greater report to the network as a variant called RUNE. This is just a client name to differentiate from zoidberg clients on the network, the currency and project is still called Boolberry, but this will be used to easily see Blockchain Development Company code going forward

Thank you for your patience

When do you make it available for testing and production use?

I would like the owner Boolberry.com to accept my binaries, can you help me reach out to the owner of that site?

In the mean time, you can build from source https://github.com/BlockchainDevelopmentCompany/boolberry/ , although I understand that is not convenient, for now I want people to look at my code updates to see that nothing bad or breaking has been implemented before I make a big push on getting miners to update.

.m.

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 260

there shall be something for tests:

old
https://github.com/clintar/boolberry
new probably
https://github.com/BlockchainDevelopmentCompany/boolberry/commit/7f11d7872549ae649675c892e234dd284beb56c4

Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 138. (Read 1210779 times)