In the wider world it is much more important that people are not intimidated by the name - it's going to take a leap of imagination on new users parts just to begin to get their heads round crypto - lets not scare them off before they've even tried.
You realize that BBR is filling a niche for people that want the highest and most secure cryptocurrency, one with complete and total anonymity? BBR isn't competing with bitcoin. Bitcoin can't provide privacy and autonomy.
There are hundreds of coins competing with bitcoin. Most, probably all, will lose.
BBR is competing against the powers of the world that don't want people to have privacy and autonomy.
Just realised I conflated a reply to two posts.
From above:
BBR offers security, ease of use (or at least better than others), speed and (optional) anonymous transactions.... what else does a normal, casual user want? Why shouldn't he use BBR too? Maybe BBR could overtake BTC one day, why not?
To suggest we cripple the coin by deliberately only appealing to a tiny segment of potential users is..... mental.
Are you sure you understand marketing? I'm amazed that you view BBR this way - you need to expand your horizons.
Of course "most probably all will lose", but one (at least) should succeed, you seem to be limiting the chances of that happening for BBR.
This isn't a war - I am genuinely concerned which direction you want to take the coin in, you seem to want to drive it further underground and use it in some personal ideological battle.