[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 272.

sussex

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 05:36:17 PM

Quote from: Patel on September 21, 2014, 05:13:47 PM

Is it really Rune now? Name is worse than before. Sounds like a kiddy game like Runescape or an MMO game where you put runes on your armors

At least Bool represents coding vocabulary

I really hope you don't name it Rune.

Rune means nothing to most people. It sounds like Ruin. It is not catchy.

I am not an owner of BBR, so please ask your own investors. Just my 2 cents.

Consider Digiberry instead or don't change the name.

BBR is a great currency abbreviation. Easy to remember. "BB" then "R".

There's a much bigger problem:

I had assumed that someone had already researched this, but maybe not.

It seems that when you google Rune you get a wikipedia page about runes followed by a ton of Runescape stuff. Fair enough, it would be be difficult to SEO your way above that lot, but it's not a serp killer - we'll just use "rune coin" instead.

Uh oh.

There is already a runecoin (http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Runecoins) and it's more Runescape stuff - how tricky will it be to con the google algo to top that? Runescape has over half a million players.

Not only does this cause a problem (a big one) for SEO, it may upset the makers of runescape (legal stuff?) and it rather destroys a main plank of your arguments that "not many people know about runescape" - well, they soon will because you will be introducing them to each other.

Surely just the fact that rune and runecoin searches throw up a ton of runescape stuff will connect the two in people's minds?

Oh well, nevermind, I expect Runescape will be glad of the extra hits.

Edit:

On closer inspection I see that it's not all runescape stuff, because there seem to be loads of other fantasy role playing games with rune in the title.

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: Patel on September 21, 2014, 05:13:47 PM

Is it really Rune now? Name is worse than before. Sounds like a kiddy game like Runescape or an MMO game where you put runes on your armors

At least Bool represents coding vocabulary

I really hope you don't name it Rune.

Rune means nothing to most people. It sounds like Ruin. It is not catchy.

I am not an owner of BBR, so please ask your own investors. Just my 2 cents.

Consider Digiberry instead or don't change the name.

BBR is a great currency abbreviation. Easy to remember. "BB" then "R".

The Boolberry logo on the home page looks great.

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: dNote on September 21, 2014, 04:10:24 PM

That is why my name is dNote, not duckNote. that is why we have dualism in our icon and that is why Bruce Lee is telling you "don't concentrate on the finger".
With the new encrypted messenger features based on new cryptography the only way for duck was to go Dark.

Now you are talking. I still like you guys. Carry on.

I don't think you ever explained the chess reference though, or did I miss that?

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Quote from: TooDumbForBitcoin on September 21, 2014, 05:09:52 PM

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on September 21, 2014, 05:07:43 PM

Quote from: drawingthesun on September 20, 2014, 09:54:45 PM

Just to clear things up, there are two attacks being touted right now.

The Anonymint attack, that might only affect Monero, (As Zoidberg said), apparently Tacotime has been working on a fix for some time.

The BCX attack, which is pure fantasy. If the BCX attack exists, it'll likely effect BBR too, however I am 99% sure that BCX is being the biggest troll here.

Why make a 500 bitcoin bet, when you can steal that amount instead?

Agree, the talks is about two different attacks. As i said.

But i didn't meand that BBR is not affeted by anonymint attack.
I meant that we already had fixed similar flaw in august, but it's quite different, so we have the same theoretical problem as Monero. The fix of this problem could be worked out in next days/weeks, but - remember, this is very rare conditions, and my personal opinion that this is even not critical to interrapt current development plan.

Crypto-zoidberg, please. The coin is Rune.

Sorry for that

We working hard on rebranding right now, since we not changed yet website/logo/first post etc, until we announce it say "officially" let's keep call it BBR, last days, so every one who love this name(including me) could use it, last times

pinky

hero member

Activity: 538

Merit: 500

Quote from: sussex on September 21, 2014, 05:13:53 PM

Quote from: TooDumbForBitcoin on September 21, 2014, 05:09:52 PM

Crypto-zoidberg, please. The coin is Rune.

Lol, priceless, where's the marketing guy?

One more proof that BBR is just working.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."

We are now at fighting stage, sadly only among community Grin

nakaone

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: Patel on September 21, 2014, 05:13:47 PM

Is it really Rune now? Name is worse than before. Sounds like a kiddy game like Runescape or an MMO game where you put runes on your armors

At least Bool represents coding vocabulary

renaming actually does not make any sense at all.

it would be so sad if one of the proper coins fails due to attack and the second one fails due horrible naming.

I hope on wednesday xmr is the same and bbr is still bbr

sussex

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: TooDumbForBitcoin on September 21, 2014, 05:09:52 PM

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on September 21, 2014, 05:07:43 PM

Quote from: drawingthesun on September 20, 2014, 09:54:45 PM

Just to clear things up, there are two attacks being touted right now.

The Anonymint attack, that might only affect Monero, (As Zoidberg said), apparently Tacotime has been working on a fix for some time.

The BCX attack, which is pure fantasy. If the BCX attack exists, it'll likely effect BBR too, however I am 99% sure that BCX is being the biggest troll here.

Why make a 500 bitcoin bet, when you can steal that amount instead?

Agree, the talks is about two different attacks. As i said.

But i didn't meand that BBR is not affeted by anonymint attack.
I meant that we already had fixed similar flaw in august, but it's quite different, so we have the same theoretical problem as Monero. The fix of this problem could be worked out in next days/weeks, but - remember, this is very rare conditions, and my personal opinion that this is even not critical to interrapt current development plan.

Crypto-zoidberg, please. The coin is Rune.

Lol, priceless, where's the marketing guy?

Grin

Patel

legendary

Activity: 1321

Merit: 1007

Is it really Rune now? Name is worse than before. Sounds like a kiddy game like Runescape or an MMO game where you put runes on your armors

At least Bool represents coding vocabulary

sussex

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: windjc on September 21, 2014, 04:38:58 PM

Quote from: slapper on September 21, 2014, 01:29:20 PM

Quote from: klee on September 21, 2014, 11:50:38 AM

I offered AnonyMint 1/4 th of my BBR stash if he helps BBR in a substantial way with the BCX attack.

Look, early money went into the wrong CN coin and things got into their heads leaving to arrogant denials and manipulations. I wrote a post about a lot of things that the XMR team did wrong and AM requoted it. Back in the day I even thanked smooth and even aminorex for bringing XMR to limelight (BBR wasn't even released back then). I also never meant any harm towards XMR but then the bile flew into the coin and you saw extremely aggressive propaganda compounded with vilification of CZ and tons of other crap.

Not the type of science I grew up appreciating.

I think this is an important post. It took me a while but over time I realized the same thing.

I realized that the arrogance that permeated the culture of XMR has a risk of being its weakness. I also noticed that because "big" money went into XMR early there was a culture of denial. And last, even though I have great respect for some of the XMR dev team, the proof is in the pudding and CZ had just created a much more well oiled machine.

Now, as more and more is coming to light, "bigger" money is starting to move into the better CN technology. And, to a man, the leadership of Rune (formerly known as BBR) wishes no ill will to any of CN coin. However, Rune will make no apologies for the advancements coming down our technological pipeline.

But as this coin develops, we as a community should remain humble. This is a technology the world needs and we have to realize that in a way, when we put all the "money" aside for a moment, we are offering the world and important service and to that end we are servants.

Really?

So windjc, this is how marketing works is it? You change the name despite a lot of opposition, you claim big things in the future, you say you're going to get Rune at the top of google and Bitcrea said yesterday that there would be an announcement.

I was expecting a fanfare, press releases, "hold the front page" kind of stuff. Maybe an item on the OP, maybe even change the logo, but no, that's not how you operate is it? That's not your MO - you do things.... differently.

So instead of a fanfare and front pages, you seem to have slipped the announcement into a little reply to a post that didn't need one.

Very clever. What do you call it? Marketing through invisibility?

#hubris
#inauspicious

TooDumbForBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1001

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on September 21, 2014, 05:07:43 PM

Quote from: drawingthesun on September 20, 2014, 09:54:45 PM

Just to clear things up, there are two attacks being touted right now.

The Anonymint attack, that might only affect Monero, (As Zoidberg said), apparently Tacotime has been working on a fix for some time.

The BCX attack, which is pure fantasy. If the BCX attack exists, it'll likely effect BBR too, however I am 99% sure that BCX is being the biggest troll here.

Why make a 500 bitcoin bet, when you can steal that amount instead?

Agree, the talks is about two different attacks. As i said.

But i didn't meand that BBR is not affeted by anonymint attack.
I meant that we already had fixed similar flaw in august, but it's quite different, so we have the same theoretical problem as Monero. The fix of this problem could be worked out in next days/weeks, but - remember, this is very rare conditions, and my personal opinion that this is even not critical to interrapt current development plan.

Crypto-zoidberg, please. The coin is Rune.

crypto_zoidberg

hero member

Activity: 976

Merit: 646

Quote from: drawingthesun on September 20, 2014, 09:54:45 PM

Just to clear things up, there are two attacks being touted right now.

The Anonymint attack, that might only affect Monero, (As Zoidberg said), apparently Tacotime has been working on a fix for some time.

The BCX attack, which is pure fantasy. If the BCX attack exists, it'll likely effect BBR too, however I am 99% sure that BCX is being the biggest troll here.

Why make a 500 bitcoin bet, when you can steal that amount instead?

Agree, the talks is about two different attacks. As i said.

But i didn't meand that BBR is not affeted by anonymint attack.
I meant that we already had fixed similar flaw in august, but it's quite different, so we have the same theoretical problem as Monero. The fix of this problem could be worked out in next days/weeks, but - remember, this is very rare conditions, and my personal opinion that this is even not critical to interrapt current development plan.

windjc

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1070

Quote from: twistelaar on September 21, 2014, 02:48:19 PM

Can somebody advice what to do with this XMR case? How many hours still left, 45 right?

Hold or sell XMR and buy BOOL? thanks

Can't advise on XMR, but you should definitely buy and Hodl Rune (formerly BBR). Just look at the bid/asks sheets. They tell you all you need to know.

windjc

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1070

Quote from: slapper on September 21, 2014, 01:29:20 PM

Quote from: klee on September 21, 2014, 11:50:38 AM

I offered AnonyMint 1/4 th of my BBR stash if he helps BBR in a substantial way with the BCX attack.

Look, early money went into the wrong CN coin and things got into their heads leaving to arrogant denials and manipulations. I wrote a post about a lot of things that the XMR team did wrong and AM requoted it. Back in the day I even thanked smooth and even aminorex for bringing XMR to limelight (BBR wasn't even released back then). I also never meant any harm towards XMR but then the bile flew into the coin and you saw extremely aggressive propaganda compounded with vilification of CZ and tons of other crap.

Not the type of science I grew up appreciating.

I think this is an important post. It took me a while but over time I realized the same thing.

I realized that the arrogance that permeated the culture of XMR has a risk of being its weakness. I also noticed that because "big" money went into XMR early there was a culture of denial. And last, even though I have great respect for some of the XMR dev team, the proof is in the pudding and CZ had just created a much more well oiled machine.

Now, as more and more is coming to light, "bigger" money is starting to move into the better CN technology. And, to a man, the leadership of Rune (formerly known as BBR) wishes no ill will to any of CN coin. However, Rune will make no apologies for the advancements coming down our technological pipeline.

But as this coin develops, we as a community should remain humble. This is a technology the world needs and we have to realize that in a way, when we put all the "money" aside for a moment, we are offering the world and important service and to that end we are servants.

dNote

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

Quote from: smooth on September 19, 2014, 06:42:03 PM

Quote from: pt7 on September 19, 2014, 05:15:16 PM

Was the DarkNotes name dictated? Did anyone vote on the name or whether to rebrand, or on the narrowed down candidates?

No they decided against the method of trying to put a community-chosen or -endorsed or whatever halo onto a brand using a manipulated sham vote where perhaps 60% of the community has its views excluded.

Instead they were simple and clear about the rebrand being done in a top-down fashion.

On the substance of the XDN rebrand (and perhaps relevant to BBR, perhaps not), I'm less interested in XDN now. I thought the old branding was more unusual and interesting, and stood apart as a reason to pay attention to the coin at all. Now I see none.

@smooth, thank you for your comment and for expressing your opinion straight and honest, as always you do.
Not only XDN name was changed. lots of work were done, please, read DarkNote whitepaper http://darknote.cc/sites/darknote.cc/files/whitepaper.pdf
We implemented DarkNote GUI client with wallet, encrypted messaging function and open-source pool wallet mining.
We will push all updates the whole of next week. duck Dark reinvention was a plan since the beginning of XDN. that is why we asked for "d" in lowercase "duck" and Dark is a grown one. That is why my name is dNote, not duckNote. that is why we have dualism in our icon and that is why Bruce Lee is telling you "don't concentrate on the finger".
With the new encrypted messenger features based on new cryptography the only way for duck was to go Dark.

twistelaar

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

Can somebody advice what to do with this XMR case? How many hours still left, 45 right?

Hold or sell XMR and buy BOOL? thanks

slapper

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1100

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: klee on September 21, 2014, 11:50:38 AM

I offered AnonyMint 1/4 th of my BBR stash if he helps BBR in a substantial way with the BCX attack.

BCX has not indicated that he attacked BBR or has any intentions of attacking BBR. Remember BBR's PoW is also diff and the same type of attack may not be even possible. No one knows what his attack is and there is no need to drag BBR with problems in Monero's blockchain. It is stupid and wreaks of malice.

Anonymint might have found a different CN exploit on his own and is offering to work with CZ et al. By and large you will find most good hackers willing to work with CZ now and in future and for good reasons. He doesn't go around trolling the forums, stays professional and is letting his code & hard work do the talking.

Look, early money went into the wrong CN coin and things got into their heads leaving to arrogant denials and manipulations. I wrote a post about a lot of things that the XMR team did wrong and AM requoted it. Back in the day I even thanked smooth and even aminorex for bringing XMR to limelight (BBR wasn't even released back then). I also never meant any harm towards XMR but then the bile flew into the coin and you saw extremely aggressive propaganda compounded with vilification of CZ and tons of other crap.

Not the type of science I grew up appreciating.

klee

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

I offered AnonyMint 1/4 th of my BBR stash if he helps BBR in a substantial way with the BCX attack.

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

By the way slapper, I made up with Zoidberg ages ago and also took a position in BBR because even though I don't see BBR overtaking Monero, I certainly see it riding out over all the other shitcoins in the forum.

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 21, 2014, 12:40:39 AM

Quote from: jl777 on September 20, 2014, 09:14:24 PM

it is quite possible that BCX noticed BBR's fix of this vulnerability and the lack of XMR's fix.

That seems plausible.

The plot thickens. Before the game is afoot, thou still let'st slip!

But this can't be the exploit where BCX said it could steal funds and also is not possible to fix. So BCX can't be talking about the anonymint exploit (that tacotime has been working on anyway)

So what is really going on.

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: jl777 on September 20, 2014, 09:14:24 PM

it is quite possible that BCX noticed BBR's fix of this vulnerability and the lack of XMR's fix.

That seems plausible.

The plot thickens. Before the game is afoot, thou still let'st slip!

Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 272. (Read 1210783 times)