Is there some closed pool?
Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 399. (Read 1210752 times)
on which pool all miners are working?Hashrate is 3,7 GH/s,but best pool I found has only 20 MH/s
Is there some closed pool?
Is there some closed pool?
c3.8xlarge (HVM) for enable huge pages
Would you happen to have a setup guide?
Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit
Code:
sudo apt-get -y install libboost1.55-dev libboost1.55-all-dev git make cmake mc
git clone https://github.com/dave-andersen/boolberry.git
cd boolberry
make -j
Thank you . I'll give it a shot tomorrow
My hashrate halved with the new code on github (my old code was 3 or 4 days ago) .
And yes I did check the hashrate just before changing version, so that's not a difficulty increase!
I use Linux.
And yes I did check the hashrate just before changing version, so that's not a difficulty increase!
I use Linux.
c3.8xlarge (HVM) for enable huge pages
Would you happen to have a setup guide?
Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit
Code:
sudo apt-get -y install libboost1.55-dev libboost1.55-all-dev git make cmake mc
git clone https://github.com/dave-andersen/boolberry.git
cd boolberry
make -j
If you're going to use the beta build of simpleminer out of my copy of the repository, please watch carefully and let me know if there are any problems. If all looks good, I'll submit a pull request so that c_z can put it into the main repository tomorrow.
(Using anything except the main boolberry repository means you're beta testing! ;-)
and, as always, I'd encourage anyone considering cloud mining to be careful about their bids and watch the market carefully. BBR has been in and out of cloud-profitability many times in the last few days, as the diff and the price bounce around. You can spend (and lose) a lot of money very quickly with Amazon.
I left it running for about 4 hours on a Digital Ocean 4-CPU droplet. It was still submitting shares when I returned.
Here's some animation made from the Boolberry logo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tix3Q0rLeWo&feature=youtu.be
I credit Bitcrea for providing the logo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tix3Q0rLeWo&feature=youtu.be
I credit Bitcrea for providing the logo.
Nice, thx!
c3.8xlarge (HVM) for enable huge pages
Would you happen to have a setup guide?
Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit
Code:
sudo apt-get -y install libboost1.55-dev libboost1.55-all-dev git make cmake mc
git clone https://github.com/dave-andersen/boolberry.git
cd boolberry
make -j
If you're going to use the beta build of simpleminer out of my copy of the repository, please watch carefully and let me know if there are any problems. If all looks good, I'll submit a pull request so that c_z can put it into the main repository tomorrow.
(Using anything except the main boolberry repository means you're beta testing! ;-)
and, as always, I'd encourage anyone considering cloud mining to be careful about their bids and watch the market carefully. BBR has been in and out of cloud-profitability many times in the last few days, as the diff and the price bounce around. You can spend (and lose) a lot of money very quickly with Amazon.
I just updated the how-to page. Let me know if there are any mistakes.
http://boolberry.com/howto.html
http://boolberry.com/howto.html
c3.8xlarge (HVM) for enable huge pages
Would you happen to have a setup guide?
Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit
Code:
sudo apt-get -y install libboost1.55-dev libboost1.55-all-dev git make cmake mc
git clone https://github.com/dave-andersen/boolberry.git
cd boolberry
make -j
c3.8xlarge (HVM) for enable huge pages
Would you happen to have a setup guide?
Here's some animation made from the Boolberry logo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tix3Q0rLeWo&feature=youtu.be
I credit Bitcrea for providing the logo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tix3Q0rLeWo&feature=youtu.be
I credit Bitcrea for providing the logo.
Is possible to compile boolberry (or at least only simpleminer) on centos 5.8 (64bit)?
c3.8xlarge (HVM) for enable huge pages
Which is the best AWS instance type for boolberry mining?
The solo miner gets about 1.3mh/s on a single instance.
240*1.3mh = 312mh. That's about 7.5% of the total nethash, and almost 8x more than the pool.
You have to have had an account for a while in good standing before they'll let you spend a lot.
Otila, I'm not familiar with the syntax of hugeadm, so I've added a log output if the miner tries to allocate hugepages and fails. Could you let me know with (a) the memory leak fix; and (b) the printf if it is still the samehashrate, *and* is actually allocating hugepages successfully?
Code:
# grep hugepage /proc/21153/maps
7f670aa00000-7f670b400000 rw-p 00000000 00:0c 15499059 /anon_hugepage (deleted)
Code:
# grep Huge /proc/meminfo
HugePages_Total: 67
HugePages_Free: 62
HugePages_Rsvd: 0
HugePages_Surp: 0
Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
It's definitely using hugepages. hashrate is climbing.. after one hour, it's about the same as boolbd or a little faster, but not 50% faster.
I don't like the current hashrate calculation, network latency and other things cause it to be unreliable, and it would be better if it took e.g. 16 latest shares into account when calculating it. For example using Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (Linux kernel lib/average.c). I can provide modified ewma.c and ewma.h I have used in other projects if you want to do the rest ;-p
The solo miner gets about 1.3mh/s on a single instance.
240*1.3mh = 312mh. That's about 7.5% of the total nethash, and almost 8x more than the pool.
You have to have had an account for a while in good standing before they'll let you spend a lot.
The solo miner gets about 1.3mh/s on a single instance.
240*1.3mh = 312mh. That's about 7.5% of the total nethash, and almost 8x more than the pool.
"optimized" keccak patch, 16% faster on Linux x86_64 (Core i5-2500K), gcc 4.9
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9h02pRWKaODZXBSclBITmxIWDQ/edit?pli=1
Donations: BBR @anonymous
I have other optimizations, too, patch #1 17% more on top of keccak patch, patch #2 6% on these two.. so total speedup 118 -> 170 khash/s.
Depending on donations I might share them. I have used only this one computer for mining :-(
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9h02pRWKaODZXBSclBITmxIWDQ/edit?pli=1
Donations: BBR @anonymous
I have other optimizations, too, patch #1 17% more on top of keccak patch, patch #2 6% on these two.. so total speedup 118 -> 170 khash/s.
Depending on donations I might share them. I have used only this one computer for mining :-(
Thank you for sharing!
Where ANN of GPU or CUDA miner?Where ann of pools?Looks like some peopleusing some GPU/CUDA miners and closed pools,and get all boolberrys...Here are so many scummers right now...I just catched your team right now.We have 4 GH/s hashrate,and best available pool-only 30 MH/s.Are you really think,all people here are fools?
Here is the GPU announce - > https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7321076
Most people are solo mining. Pools do not currently offer much advantage versus solo mining.
Feel free to ask any questions but please do not call us scummers.
He is not sharing them. No one has the GPU except cbuchner1.
Yes. While your name suggests you're just trolling, I will respond seriously, once. ;-)
I have over 200 EC2 instances running right now. https://www.dropbox.com/s/38t9nydfb6e151m/Screenshot%202014-06-22%2016.01.50.png
All of them mining solo in the wallet.
The solo miner gets about 1.3mh/s on a single instance.
240*1.3mh = 312mh. That's about 7.5% of the total nethash, and almost 8x more than the pool.
And what will really blow your mind is that I'm one of the smallest people doing the cloud mining game. There's probably someone out there with 1000.
I expect it to cost just under 4BTC. Until this little price downswing over the last two hours, which I'm assuming is someone artificially trying to reduce the price to play swing games, this was very reasonable. A little scary, but my cost to acquire BBR was cheaper than buying it on Poloniex. I list my sells high and am happy either way - either I get BBR at or below market price (which is nice), or I sell at much more than my cost (which is nice). The big risk I'm incurring is the same as anyone else holding altcoins -- if it crashes, I'll have a huge AWS bill to pay. It's not entirely trivial making sure that your 240 instances aren't messing up and bleeding away your money. *shrugs* Nothing comes for free.
"optimized" keccak patch, 16% faster on Linux x86_64 (Core i5-2500K), gcc 4.9
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9h02pRWKaODZXBSclBITmxIWDQ/edit?pli=1
Donations: BBR @anonymous
I have other optimizations, too, patch #1 17% more on top of keccak patch, patch #2 6% on these two.. so total speedup 118 -> 170 khash/s.
Depending on donations I might share them. I have used only this one computer for mining :-(
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9h02pRWKaODZXBSclBITmxIWDQ/edit?pli=1
Donations: BBR @anonymous
I have other optimizations, too, patch #1 17% more on top of keccak patch, patch #2 6% on these two.. so total speedup 118 -> 170 khash/s.
Depending on donations I might share them. I have used only this one computer for mining :-(
Jump to: