[Fixing your quote to reflect the proper author and post content]
tl;dr: it's justified, leave it be.
Hi, heard back from BC with evidences. I can understand their need to take a while to compile and show me what really happened with your case... as well as appreciating them to trusting me in this matter and their willingness to cooperate.
First of all, initially, they told me that the ban was not strictly due to one certain local mods abuse their power, it's a case of justified ban that --much like marmar-- was either done by the system due to violation or by the mods doing their duty. Further, they also explained that this is not the first time you got tempo-banned, nor the dozen-th time of it, or the two dozen, be it automatically by system or by mods due to the increasing demand of the chatbox to remove you from chatbox.
For those reasons above, with the compelling evidence that the ban placed on you was justified instead of a misplaced ban, someone has an itchy hand, or something else, unlike the situation with your friend MarMar, this time, I will not ask them to reconsider lifting your ban.
Though I understand that absence of chatbox can reduce a user's overall experience on a platform to a degree, it's not exactly essential to use the main feature of the platform: to gamble [for fun], of which, FAIK, this feature was not limited for you. So my advice is to let this chat box situation go, use it as a learning point to be careful on chatbox [on other platform, which I'm sure you have and use alongside BC] and that it was a "separate" ecosystem that has its own set of rules that needs to be adhered.