People should check the background or character of the people they entrust their money with, but unfortunately, some people are so good at hiding their character that they only get exposed when the deed is already done.
Temptation is really high for people to take a chance on gamblers, especially if they see a match that they figure out could give them a sure win.
It is true that people should check the background of the individuals that they put in sensitive financial positions, so that they will not tamper with the money that is entrusted in their care.
But this can be misleading because people can change after they get into a position of authority, like the guy in the OP, I'm sure that if they had known that he will tamper with the funds that is kept in his care, he wouldn't have been in that position and to gamble with the money that is not his. Money should only be put in the trust of people with proven intergity about monetary affairs.
Good point. Indeed, people can change after they get into a position of authority. Normally they become worse than before, but sometimes they become better, more responsible for their actions. So, it works both ways, I guess. We should always remember that people can change for better too.
People are driven by greed, to the extent of using money that is not theirs to gamble, in the hope of winning and replacing the capital, that is a very ridiculous idea because gambling is risky. In gambling it's either win or lose, and the chances of losing is greater, so it'll be very irresponsible for anybody to gamble with other people's money.
Good point again. It is very irresponsible to gamble with other people's money. But I'd say: No matter what your chances of winning are, even if they are 90%, you shouldn't put other people's money at risk. If you have an idea like that and you can't stifle it - you are weak.