@NewsletterBitcoin when you will send the donation? Or you will scam people from your escrow service?
I did not say anywhere anything about any kind of donation. All you are writing is pure BS,
as you already admitted. Don't worry, your attempt to distract the heat which is over you now simply won't work. If you were not a scammer I would have said that you are acting like a 12 years child.
This could be the first legit claim in this entire thread...
Or you have been smoking the same stuff like saxydev since you are the single person in the entire forum who is opposing my flag against this clown
He actually owed money to another member before (and one more now), so this is not first accusation against him, but I guess you didn't read everything carefully.
Actually, he
did read carefully. And, at first,
he activated an alt account for taking the scammer's side. I may be wrong, but the coincidence is too big to go unnoticed: immediately after that user posted, Rizzrack opposed the flag. And, by then, not even saxydev was opposing the flag, lol.
I believe it's not a scam. [...] I fail to see the scam.
In any case, no matter if coincollector12is his alt or not,
this is not first time when Rizzrack sides with a scammer. He did it in the past once more, with another Romanian scammer, although he supported him only in a softer form.
Do you remember
andulolika? Yes, andulolika
which made death threats, andulolika
the self-admitted ban evader, andulolika
the load defaulter, andulolika
the scammer.
Long story short,
after saying he wanted to slit a forum user's throat andulolika decided to start a topic in Romanian board,
saying trying to say that he wants to be hired as translator. The scam was the following: since andulolika is even more illiterate than saxydev (although this may look impossible), this it was obvious that he was unable to perform any translation. He was barely able to spell his name. Therefore, anyone paying him would have been scammed, as the underclassman was not able to provide any kind of translation.
This is an example of how illiterate he is. The post contains all the spelling mistakes he made within a five sentences post: 24 mistakes. As a consequence of writing that bad, from his topic title could not be sensed if he wanted
to hire a translator or
to be hired as a translator. And, when I found the topic, I assumed he is looking to hire a translator. Therefore I wrote him a post saying I am interested to be hired as a translator. When he replied he started swearing and talking very bad.
So seeing how bad he writes I quickly understood that he is unable to perform any translation, since he is unable to spell (not even in Romanian). So
I wrote this in English inside his thread, encouraging users also to read the feedbacks andulolika received. From that point forward he started to yell even more, to curse, swear etc. That's less important, but I had to say for you to understand the context.
And here comes Rizzrack which, instead of exposing the scammer, like anybody which wanted to say something would have done, he actually took scammer's side,
in a way. Inside the quoted post he is patronizing like he is the forum owner
*, saying that if I and andulolika want to continue the back and forward to do it in English.
*Acting like the forum owner can be sensed in this sequence: "Va puteti certa peste tot in engleza (meta, reputation, scam accusation, offtopic, twitter etc.) dar aici scrieti in romana! [...] Ma astept ca toata lumea sa faca la fel. Am mai facut aluzii dar nu prea au fost intelese"
In English it means the following: "In English you can fight anywhere [...] but here you write in Romanian! (
n.b. notice the exclamation point from the end of the sentence, like it was an order) [...] I am expecting everybody to do so (
n.b. He was expecting, lol. And who was he? Forum owner?). I made some allusions before but it seems they were not understood (
n.b. again, acting like an owner. Who was he to make any allusion, anyway?).
And
this is precisely what I told him too: I told him I sense the patronizing from his tone and that his allegations sound like orders. Then I recommended him to lose the air of superiority, as he is not superior to anybody here and, certainly, this is not
his forum. Besides, there is no rule forbidding English in a local board. And even if I were to break a rule --
which I did not -- that would not entitle him anyway to patronize and talk like he is the landlord and the forum is his land and the users are his slaves. After that he shut up, being forced to do so also by andulolika, which locked his thread.
In any case, until this point, it was a soft attempt of him to side with the scammer. However, he continued. After andulolika told me that
he will piss on me and burn me I opened a topic in Meta, asking if this statement can be considered a death threat.
Rizzrack showed there as well, now taking scammer's side in plain sight, by saying there is no scam. Obviously, since andulolika did not sign any contract for a translation no scam exists. However, if he were in the situation to get hired, the client would have been certainly scammed. Since the scammer could not spell correctly even the word "Ok", then how could he deliver a translation?!
In the end, this is second time Rizzrack supports a Romanian scammer. And his behavior was noticed by other users too, not just by dkbit98:
it's a bit weird that such a flag really gets opposition. It's not a good showing to side with a scammer...
This is the first time you took part in the opposition while no other DT took part in the opposition of the flag while the flag is active.
I've been suspicious of him for a long time, way long before coming across this thread.
Your guts were right. As things developed, saxydev "managed" to scam 3 individuals already only since this thread was started. Meaning in only 22 days. That's something, isn't it?
There are strong charges against you for non-payment, but you are arguing with everyone here without addressing them. You have an attitude problem, but you like to argue more than pay others, don't you?
Well, it's way easier to blah-blah than taking money out of your pocket, isn't it?
What is the fraud part? Not addressing what?
Playing dumb at level 99+. Obviously, ScamViruS is trying to tell you that you are not addressing the debts you have to pay.
If you will send to me the link I will pay 0.1 btc. Fuck off moron. I am sick of this bullshit
Playing dumb again, to distract attention. dkbit98 already sent you the link. It's right here:
Like I promised, I am keeping my word and I am posting one free website that is called
antinalysis.org, so I will now post my BTC address and I expect to receive 0.1 BTC you promised to send me.
Who the fuck are you? Are you just spamming for your signature campaign 5$ bullshit?
Obviously, by your judgement everyone which is posting here is doing it just for spamming a signature campaign.
But you did not denied it or been agaisnt it. You just proved yourself with your post.
I did not deny what? And what means that I proved myself? I proved myself as what?
You are replying to only whats in your interest to twist my words.
This is a common sense conclusion. I am, indeed, replying to what I'm interested in: to be more precise, to expose what a scammer you are. However, I am not twisting any of your words. This is exactly what you write.
First of all, you have to proof that NewsletterBitcoin wanted to donate. If NewsletterBitcoin wanted to donate and now deny to donate then the case of you and NewsletterBitcoin will be the same. But we cant say that until you show proof. As I said before you can proof easily even if the post is deleted.
There is nothing to prove. The scammer only tries to distract the attention. He already admitted he is making up words.
Like here:
You are acting like a clown. I have never said such things and any normal person can see inside this thread that I never said this.
Well..
You didn't have to. I did it. I did it for youQuoted for reference. Now it's also reflected as a negative Trust score on your profile. Most likely, more will follow.
Or here:
This is what I said, by continuing you agree directly to the thread. By avoiding replying or not denying you implicit accepted to donate your money.
Lol, he is far beyond any level of ridiculousness.
After that did not hold much water it was shifted 180 degrees to the back and forth dkbit had with him and the words "Wanna bet I am wright?".
First of all, it's "right", not "wright".
Second of all, are you following your favored scammer's path? Twist someone's words?
dkbit98 did not make any bet with the scammer. He proposed him a an offer, a deal:Let me make you an offer
So stop lying in plain sight!
I understand dkbit might frequent the gambling section of the forum more than I do
And you understand that from where? And what's the relevance in this case? What's the connection between this habit of dkbit98 (either if he has it or not) and the fact that saxydev scammed him? What you just said is as relevant as you would have said "
I understand dkbit might drink more coffee than me". Okay, he may drink more coffee than you. So what? What's the connection?
but as some other users mentioned before me
The fact that you do not expect a win, yet you wait to see the result and the result is the one you anticipated, does not make you ineligible to claim what you just won.And why don't you quote also the later replies of those which you quoted above? Here, let me help you out:
OK, OK, you convinced me. I'll support too the tag.
Picture this: you go to a gambling place and bet that a basketball game will end with a draw. I don't know what you know about basketball, but chances for ending in a draw are infinitesimal. Then, guess what?, the game actually ends in a draw. So you go to the cashier to pay you the money you just won. Based on your judgement, in this example, the cashier is supposed to say: "You never expected to be paid for this, right?". Furthermore, also based on your judgement, if the cashier will not pay you it will be fine. In the end, you did not expect for that game to actually end in a draw. Right?Why do you care if or what I smoke ?
And why do you care if dkbit98 gambles more than you?
For now the best option for me is just waiting [...]
it should be no more than 30-60mins
lets wait and see.
5-10 hours then, okay
He insist [...]
he will send me [...]
let's wait and see.
Do you see the pattern here?
This waiting and seeing won't take you anywhere. Instead of
waiting and seeing you'd better follow dkbit98's advice:
if address you gave him is showing zero coins, than you should make scam accusation against him.
Even if he paid later than he promised means that he broke one more written agreement, that is reason for another flag against him.
If you are not aware of what is the description of a flag, let me help you out:
So only the fact that he lured you for 19 days already is reason good enough for creating a flag. And, based on your words, it's been 19 days since he was supposed to pay you.
he promised to sent the money on jan 25th.
never received till today.
Furthermore, same thing should have been done by the other user which was delayed with payment (unlike you, this guy was luckier and received the payment, although it was made after the settled date):
it was about an account that he wanted to sell me. After the bitcoins had been sent, it became quiet.
In all these cases, based on flag's definition, saxydev violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages.
