Topic: Be careful with saxydev; he is a scammer - page 4. (Read 1649 times)

Oh, what a generous lil' scammer we have here! Isn't he simply kawaii?  He's doing it for free...


Lol, good question! Then why do you argue since yourself are offering it for free? Oo


Oh, I totally understand. I actually said that. I was merely explaining dkbit98 why you haven't paid yet the ~2200$ -- because you are a very busy and active businessman, just like he thought you are.


Nah, I'm okay, thank you. Perhaps you want to call them? Also let them know if you pay taxes for the incomes you have from your "free" service scams.


Oh, what a loss! I feel devastated!

---

I still don't understand... how about this statement you keep breaking?

One thing is analyse of inputs (there is nothing as such for free online) and another thing is an aml score, he provided a link for aml score. As it is on my thread, I also offer to do it for free on TRX!

Why would I argue that there is no service online for free when myself I am offering it for free!? or a really small fee (in case of BTC/ETH).

@NewsletterBitcoin

Stop speaking if you don't know what happened. I asked the guy since 21 and after on 25th if he wants his money back. Things happen, people get busy.
And about ANAF, as a matter of fact, I don't think they have risk management in crypto (as a division) in Romania yet. But I can give if you want some numbers of some people from there to put you on topic lol. I am really sad, there is a small chance for me to be back in Romania this year (too much headache for the visa), I was just on a flight change on Monday from Istanbul, perhaps next time year, would've been cool to prove you are wrong.

Don't lose too much time with this scammer, it's pointless. He is not not just a "normal" scammer, but also a stupid one. He was that stupid that he actually pushed someone to make a deal with him, in plain sight, while many eyes were on him, just to scam that person while having everybody's attention. Lol! I never saw anything like that. Usually scammers work in the dark, hoping to not be caught. This one is a monument of stupidity.

Please don't forget to support created by dkbit98.

---

Furthermore, even after dkbit98 posted the site, the scammer denied its existence (facepalm):


This reminds me of a specific city of Romania (Caracal), where it's said that the carriage of idiots flipped over. Among some examples of stupidity, it's said that, when a guy from Caracal sees his a giraffe, when he looks at it he says <>". So he actually sees the giraffe with his own eyes; yet, it does not exist. Just like saxydev.

(For the lulz, if you want to know, in Caracal there is only one school and its name is School #2; they built a building and they forgot the crane inside it; the door of Police precinct was stolen; the graveyard is on Resurrection Street; the bakery is on Hunger Street; the jail is on Freedom Street; the headquarters of firemen caught fire; on the display of the clock placed inside the train station, which uses Roman numbers, hour 4 is displayed as "IIII" instead of "IV". I really believe that saxydev is from Caracal.)

---

Oh, no! But when the guy paid you were not busy, huh? Just by coincidence, in that moment you were not busy so you took his money. And, bad luck, since then you were so busy that you simply did not find the less than 30 seconds necessary for paying him back.

Probably also because of being busy you did not pay yet to dkbit98 too?


dkbit98, you were so right! This guy is so active in business that he does not even have time to send a payment from his crypto wallet. Please understand him.


You could have said, at least, "I am sorry for trying to scam you and for paying you back with delay and only after you raised this problem in the eyes of many witnesses". But what can know about manners a Neanderthal like you?


That should be third or fourth time you said that, yet you still come back. Perhaps, if you keep returning, next time you'll come back also with dkbit98's money? Write it on a note or something, to not forget. We all know that being so busy like you it's possible to forget minor details (a debt to Belkin1986, another one to dkbit98 -- minor stuff like that).


Perhaps you misread your agreement.


You hadn't? Then what's this supposed to mean?



Then what did you do?


Just saying what?


And that makes you sad... poor baby... Have you visited ANAF headquarters, as I instructed you? I told you that the inspectors there will point you exactly what you need to know.

FYI, such terms were never specified in your original agreement. Allow me to quote you:


So, you see, you ambiguously stated that "there is no such a service for free anywhere", without specifying its required features or that it must be an exact copy of yours. The word 'such' in this context is a pronoun used to describe a thing of a similar type or category as something previously mentioned.

As I see it, dkbit98 successfully proved that there is such a service for free after you accept the deal.  

I was busy, but what else can be said? To make you enjoy yourselves and make more signature posts? Neah. I am off this thread

Just fyi, he did not send any link regarding my service. The link he had sent, contains not daily updated databases, and for TRX, myself I charge 0$, just 4$ for a monthly subscription on BTC. (it's a different service than our agreement (if you still believe i had an agreement with him)).

So I have not broken any contract yet. just saying

@NewsletterBitcoin - I still did not received the law refference from you.. ;(

Then adjust your feedback.

Belkin1986, do you have any update on this matter?
[/quote]

Yes, it was about an account that he wanted to sell me. After the bitcoins had been sent, it became quiet. Since the thread has been here, he sent me all Bitcoin back yesterday.

I also noticed this ridiculous lie -- and also the fact that the scammer acted in good faith. Have you ever thought the opposite? 
I really don't understand how some can say such lies in your face when it's crystal clear that whay they say is a lie...


Dear dkbit98, I believe you have too high expectations here Of course the pauper does not have 0.1 BTC. As I explained before,


Imagine his lunch: dirt from four fingernails; dinner: dirt from three more fingernails. On the other side, waiting him to pay on weekly / monthly basis could work, but you know what that would mean, don't you? It would mean for him to scam some more until payment date =)))

---

You'd be surprised, but the scammer also supports KYC. According to a post he made inside Romanian board,


In English, he is saying that "KYC will be extremely important for financial security in crypto, but not yet". Although both I and PrivacyG asked him what he means with this idiocy, he never replied. He replied saying something else, of course, but without answering to our questions.

So what can you expect from someone supporting KYC? To believe anything from your valuable topic Why KYC is extremely dangerous – and useless? He won't of course. And, even more bad, he may also make others believe that KYC is safe for them, luring them into traps which they never imagined before.


What I find to be more ironic and amusing is that the scammer did not oppose the flag =))) It's like he admits his guilt

---

Belkin1986, do you have any update on this matter?

Hello saxydev,

after reviewing your case, it's very clear that DT is right to bring up a scammer flag on your account. I'm always giving members a benefit of doubt but your case is really unfortunate because all evidence is right here.
The flag brought up by dkbit98 applies because you accepted the deal. It's archived. You might have a different point of view but DT is a decentralized system and as long as dkbit98's accusation is valid, the flag is appropriate.

You can only get rid of the flag by making dkbit98 roughly whole and even then, there's still your fraudulent service (but your fraudulent service is not related to your flag).
So, yes, make dkbit98 roughly whole and he might forgive you.

In addition it's a bit weird that such a flag really gets opposition. It's not a good showing to side with a scammer...

Let's wait for Belkin1986's evidence if there's even more fraud.  

---

And may I ask, why you also defended a dangerous fraud Shitcoin?  

---

You are missing the point that a Shitcoin is mostly harmless and "just" resulting in a loss (by simply holding it).
PI is a fraudulent shitcoin where harm is actively done in multiple ways:

PI is only available for people doing KYC. This results in possible identity theft, which is even more harmful that just a financial loss. PI is a private company and should be sued and punished for requiring KYC.
PI is advertising to be mined via phone, which is potentially damaging for the phone but at least it's unprofitable by making false promises.
PI is a glorified ponzi.

And the only winners of PI Shitcoin are the founders!

Supporting a fraudulent Shitcoin like PI should be highly discouraged.

Liar!
This thread was not locked, and you were not online for days with this profile.

I am still waiting for you to pay me ''small'' payout you owe me.
Your profile have all neutral feedback, and flag against you still stands is because you need to pay me 0.1 BTC.
If you are so poor that you don't have 0.1 BTC, I can also accept for you to pay me monthly or weekly in smaller denominations, until you pay the full amount.

Creating feedback for someone without providing any links, history or some proof is worthless in this forum, and that goes for all members not just for this case.
I was wondering for what service exactly did you pay 0.0071 BTC to member saxydev?

Hi, I have saved the whole history and can post it. He wrote to me yesterday that he would like to send me the Bitcoin back, I'll wait, otherwise the whole process will come in here.

This is irrelevant for the deal. You two made a deal which implied dkbit98 to present an example of a free service, without talking anything about the quality of the respective service. And he provided what he had to. You, on the other side, scammed dkbit98.


Oh no... poor man, he is overwhelmed...


Correct. it's no shame to realize you are wrong, that you did the wrong thing, that you took the bait for something stupid and so on. But when you realize that you also have to take responsibility for your actions and pay for them. If you drive while being drunk and Police stops you, then you may realize what you just did. However, realizing the fact is not synonymous with paying for doing the wrong thing. If you realize you just drove while being drunk, you still have to pay the sanction given by Police, they may still take your driving license etc. Similar to this case, you realize what you did was wrong. Now pay what you owe to dkbit98 and move forward and try to not scam people anymore.


That would be the second time when you say "there is no such thing".


You are pretty jumpy with this "there is no such things". Last time you used it you got yourself in a ~2300$ debt.


That's just another lie. I never locked this topic.


Good faith? You acted with good faith? Looooooooooooool!


Congrats for reaching this great number! Make sure you post it here: Announce your rank up, merit or any achievements that makes you feel great!

---

True. Yet, if you look again, you'll also notice that it is also the second untrusted feedback saying saxydev scammed someone. True, the other feedback does also not have a reference link. And curiously, saxydev also accused his accuser of being a scammer (however, the reference link he provided shows nothing relevant). Theese feedbacks may not be, indeed, circumstantial evidence.

However, in Romania we have a saying: "there is no smoke without a fire". In our case, it would mean that these feedbacks would not appear just like that, out of nowhere. Maybe there is a grain of truth inside them. Of course, everybody can also say "maybe not". But seeing what saxydev did in plain sight to dkbit98, this could add some traction to the accuses he received as untrusted feedbacks.

That's Untrusted feedback from a Newbie without Reference link. It lacks evidence.

Things are getting more curious now.

Belkin1986 left today a red flag on saxydev's profile, accusing them of scamming Belkin out of 0.0071 Bitcoin.  I invited Belkin on this topic to write their story because something fishy is definitely going on here.

Before Belkin gets to share their story, do you have anything to say about it, saxydev?  Or, was it just another written agreement you did not fulfill?

-
Regards,
PrivacyG

The service like what dkbit have offered (the link he sent), I offer myself a better version but for free to check on TRX and for less than 3$ on subscription for BTC/ETH. Check my thread again.

Too many replies to quote or answer to everyone. I think I reacted fast to dkbit and modified and kept in the post the fact that I modified, for the critics, it is no shame to realise when you are wrong or about taking the bait for something stupid or which can be used against you.

@NewslletterBitcoin give us the law which makes it illegal, year and furthure modification. There is not such a law.

I wanted to reply to this topic but at a moment the thread was locked at that moment I realised no matter how much I am in good faith, I was made a criminal for them.

This is not ok, but I have nothing else to do.

Right now I am having a busy week so I can't check the forum more than 2-3 times/week.

This is a trust abuse all of these for some attention and some small payout from a signature campaign.

And hell yeah, my 400th post on this forum

I check each time I reply on this thread what is the last online of saxydev. Cause we may not get a response from saxydev as s/he can ignore us. So, I want to verify whether s/he has not been online or ignoring us. I think saxydev is now on holiday or checking the situation from an alt account.

I didn't make a trap for anyone and I didn't call ''next user'', I talked with one specific user and he replied.
If he didn't brag so much about his revolutionary invisible universal service than I wouldn't be challenged to tell him before there are free services like this.
He said this is not true and that made me ask him to pay me if I provide a link, then he agreed, so there is clear history here, unlike your imaginary ''next user''.
Again, anyone can easily oppose the flag... instead of writing theoretical fairy tales

PS
Nobody noticed how saxydev mysteriously dissapeared from forum after this event on 25 January  

Yes, it was clearly a trap, hence my reluctance to flag that guy. But nobody has forced him to accept the deal.
saxydev was too keen to paint himself as.. something he isn't, hence he has fallen into that trap.
Sorry, but doing business for such an account/person is risky.

Then no one will be agreed with your demand. But if anyone feel comfortable than still the person may choice it. I think no one will choose it as there is no benefit/profit. As no one will buy anything @1000$ which real value is 5$. On the contrary if you say I will give 5$ to anyone who will be the next poster of me. By posting after you will not make me loser so I And everyone will accept your offer as everyone can want to buy any product at 5$ which real value is 1000$ or more than the asking amount.

Actually anyone can accept your offer of the person has benefit/profit.

Where I live, verbal contracts are just as valid as written contracts. And it's allowed to record any conversation you're having, which makes it easy to prove.

It still feels like tricking someone into having an excuse to create a scammer Flag. It was obvious nobody is going to pay $2000 for posting a link.
How about this: "The next user who posts after me, agrees to pay me 0.1 Bitcoin." That sounds like a casual agreement to me. But it shouldn't be allowed!