Topic: Be careful with saxydev; he is a scammer - page 6. (Read 1688 times)

According to ninjastic.space, he initially accepted the deal:



Later on, he chickened-out and cancelled the deal:



However, after being ridiculed by PrivacyG he became brave again:


Now I am also barely waiting to see if he'll pay him doing the Houdini move, after dkbit98 will provide the links.

---

The deal circus is still on, PrivacyG! The clown saxydev found his balls again and double downed the deal!

I have those addresses too, they're listed here

Lol. Did you realize starting a post like this already gives the reader a certain first impression of you?

I've seen your "AML checks" topic, which is of course BS. You can't have a "universal" database of "bad things" if it varies per country what is or isn't considered "bad". The notion of "taint" is BS, I'm pretty sure it's designed as an attack on Bitcoin because governments and banks can't shut down Bitcoin in any other way. By attacking it's fungibility, they make people doubt it. So anyone trying to profit of this helps spread this crazy anti-Bitcoin idea.
I really hope nobody is stupid enough to pay $250 to have someone poke around in their privacy, but (ironically) if someone's dumb enough to do so, I expect it to be people with bad intentions because they're the ones trying to get away with something. So that means if your AML "service" gets used, it's likely you'll be paid with "illegal funds".

That's unethical, but not illegal.
For what it's worth: if someone wants to pay me to tell them their Bitcoin isn't tainted, feel free

Of course they don't do it for free, they're selling the idea of taint. That's their business model, and having people believe they need to buy is their core business. Stop buying this, you're not paying someone to check the history of the banknotes in your wallet, so don't do it for electronic cash either. Fungibility is all that matters, and Bitcoin is fungible.

There are no debts in Bitcoin inputs.

Did you accept the deal? No need to post if you don't accept the deal. 

But seriously, anyone with a brain cell can easily find plenty of options available online. Some of them even offer free options. So, what's the point you're trying to make? Can you explain how your service is different? Are there any features that set it apart? Can you provide an example using a random address for comparison?

Anyway, from what I've seen in your previous posts, I honestly doubt that you have the technical know-how for in-depth blockchain analysis. No offense, but I need some convincing. Show me I'm wrong, I'll eat my words with a side of humble pie.

Did he really found it? Post it than. Still waiting lol

Just found this thread.  What a fun read.

What made you change your mind 20 minutes after accepting the deal?  Did it take you 20 minutes to realize how easy it actually was for dkbit98 to earn $2,000 for one post and a CTRL + V?

Guess someone found some services in under 15 minutes and had to edit posts before a reply from dkbit arrived.  Damn it, dkbit.  Had you been quicker, this thread would have been so much more fun to follow!  It would have ended as a 'how quickly can saxydev do the Houdini move'

-
Regards,
PrivacyG

Edit:
Deal. Let's see

Neah, you know what. You are a legendary member and it will very easy to proof your own words/statements.

There is none and there will never be a free service, it will make no sense to let it be free. Only mainting it daily as cost is that high, that 1 week for free ruins the business and the checks are useless.

I keep my word, lifetime free in debt analysis of any input of your choosing.

Just because you can't find something that doesn't mean this thing doesn't exist, except maybe in your mind.
I said that I can prove such services exist already, I know two who are totally free and others who are paid, unlike your imaginary service that nobody ever saw, because you don't have website or anything else.
Let me make you an offer, if I post a proof for a free service like I said you will pay me 0.1 BTC, I think this is fair offer for a guy who is so active businessman like you.

Ya sure good luck with that NewsletterBitcoin lol

enjoy your happy life lol

This is how scammers are exposed here. Or, in part, this is how it's done -- by checking post history. And by checking any online activity which may lead to evidence. Simply, this is how it's done.


This is because you have no education, you are an underclassman and you did not even learn some ethics about posting. In order for a post to be clearly understood it's recommended to quote relevant parts from the earlier post(s).


I was being sarcastic. This is why I also left your original words, but with strikethrough font. To be clear that I am not trying to change your words, but to ridicule you. Sadly for you, your very low intellect does not help you understand such subtle things, nor a subtle sarcasm. But it's okay, nature needs both wise and idiots.


Guess what? I just did it


I asked you above, but you never replied:



What was I supposed to do? Congratulate you for trying to scam people?


I did not accuse you yet. I'm just collecting evidence at the moment.


I do have a life. And I have a happy life. Also, a honest life. Can you sleep well during the night, thinking at the people you scammed or you tried to scam?


If imbecility would hurt, you'd probably be in pain and yell day and night. Fortunately for you, it doesn't hurt.

Well, dear NewsletterBitcoin, I wanted to avoid you. But when you have someone that looks through your posts and find the most ridiculous accusations to bring against you, just can't ignore/giving you this privilege.

Perhaps Gazeta means Newspaper in romanian, but you are acting like a stressing newsletter on which you click unsubscribe, but you still get those emails.

I can't follow your story telling exposing nor understand why is there a need to quote every part of a reply and just reply out of context to parts of a message.


The moment when you quote someone and you modify the message shows what kind of person you are. No matter what's the topic. You can't quote and edit the quote. You just can't.

So far you have offended me, blamed me, accused me and even modified the quotes of my messages. Get a life lol

By calling you an idiot, I am offending the idiots. I am sorry for that

I thought you were going to leave the forum...


And I also thought you were ignoring me...


Now I'm confused. Have you lied, perhaps? Same as you do inside your topics, in order to cheat people?

---

There, I corrected the sentence for you. Thank me later.



Obviously, I never tried to scam anyone. Of course I am new to this. However, I have experience in finding scammers. Besides, I think I told you once, "Gazeta" is translated in English as "Newspaper", not "Newsletter". Perhaps you'll learn now.


Oooooo-ho-ho-ho! I laughed. It's sooo funny to steal someone's money, isn't it? Veeery, very funny!


No, they are not yours.


I believe that Police will decide, not people. Same as it'll happen with you too, sooner or later.


Precisely! This must be also why I exposed the other two Romanian illiterate scammers -- andulolika and bekli23.

When you do research about a subject you need information, aml on blockchain is all about information. The information must be updated daily and most of the topics.


- banks - thanks thanks, it was an ok ammount from my perspective

-ransom attacks - from conti to lazarus, most of the lately ransomware do not come with a public key posted in the ransomware note.
You need this information in order to find ransomware attacks or when ransom money are being laundered, who is laundering, from where is the source of funds or if the ransomware was paid. Most of the organisations always pay but they deny paying it.
I recommend bleepingcomputer as forum for this or https://www.vx-underground.org/ or my favourite https://id-ransomware.blogspot.com/ .

-the paper - if you will try to read from time to time, you will see why it is important to learn more about certain topics. Read the paper, great read!.

-real owner - when there is a hack or a scam, people are looking for details about who own's the address. NewsletterBitcoin is not the owner (I found out who he was).

-stolen funds on trx - there is not much information about trx just available online, even tho 42% of usdt blackmail attacks are paid through trc20. But of course, NewsletterBitcoin is new to this, he needs to find out about usdt first.

The discussion about keys is fun, not your keys, not your coins. If I have your key, are these my coins? That's interesting enough to debate, happened recently on this forum with yogg. Were those his coins if he had the keys? People will decide, not me.

For me NewsletterBitcoin is bored and he wants reach his weekly post requirment for the signature campaign.

Excepting saxydev's precious piece of shit analysis analyse, another argument for the possibility of him being a scammer can be found by browsing his topics. His topics, not his posts! And, by looking at the topics he started, we can see names as:

Information about cyprus banks -- here he was looking for advice on how to move 200.000 euro from a Moldavia bank to an Italian one. I wonder how could this pauper make 200.000 euro...
Looking for information about ransom attacks
Looking for a paper -- here he was looking for a paper (?!) -- "I am looking for this paper: Discerning payment patterns in Bitcoin from ransomware attacks"
Interested in finding the real owner of a btc address - 40$ XMR -- "Please don't make it public, sensitive matter (not personal)."
Looking for hacks on the TRX network, stolen funds on TRON

And the list goes on. Furthermore, inside each topic he offered a shitty amount of money (5$ - 10$) for those giving him good information. For me, it seems like saxydevs tries to learn as much as he can from previous scams and then try to repeat them.

Maybe the topic which shows the most his scammy character is this: Maybe some hacks should not be illegal.


Seriously? What honest person would ask this?

Besides, one reply says things bluntly:


What else can be thought about someone asking such questions?

---

dkbit98, for the sake of the argument, if you manage to find some free time, give this moron some examples, to prove him that he is both a liar and an imbecile.

Dude, there is not such a service for free anywhere. What are you even talking about? You can try a lifetime pointing me to a free service. There is none.

I don't care about your lifetime BTC/ETH analyse, whatever that is, fact is that you are 100% using some third party tool, and I could prove it easily but I don't want to waste time on that.
Another fact is that you know nothing about Bitcoin and any other cryptocurrency, and if you love pi network crap so much than use your ''analyse'' for pi newtork not for bitcoin.
I doubt even a single person from forum ever paid a cent for your magical ''analyse'' of anything.

Congrats for confirming again your high moral standards and your good level of education!

Just a side note here, if I am allowed: "Gazeta" means "Newspaper", not "Newsletter". It's just a small difference, like the one between "duke" and "douche". But again, don't worry too much about it. Your main problem is not the poor knowledge of English. What's really embarrassing is the fact that you don't know even your own language.


Yes, they are. If you are not sure, feel free to go to ANAF headquarters (ANAF is the Romanian IRS) and let those inspectors know that you are doing their job. I believe they'll be happy to hear it.


Oh, no!


I may be; yet I am not.


Nobody forces you to like GazetaBitcoin.


Skipping the poor usage of English for arranging the words inside the sentence, to answer to your question I'd say to be transparent and make the deals inside your topic.


I am not sure you know the difference between "vouch" and "voucher". According to WikiDiff,


This is even a greater signal for being a scammer: selling something that's free?! Oo


Similar, I also did not say that he is a scammer. I said that he may be and, by outlining some of his actions, I wanted to make people aware of who they may be dealing with.

---

Is that the analysis pointed by BlackHatCoiner at your Trust page?


And you are among those 95%, right?


They do?


Really?


Can you name some?


I beg your pardon?


It is testnet or mainnet? Now I'm confused. You say here they use testnet, but a few lines up you said they have mainnet. Make your decision, will you?


You are an imbecile and this is another fact.

---

And the retaliatory feedback brought him another feedback from me. Still, a neutral one. But he's getting close to get a negative one. Each post he makes he's one step closer

That's correct, hence no red tag yet from DT, although many have got red tag much easier, also without scamming anybody, but with more obvious attempts to scam.
Still, a bit of awareness is imho okay; his actions are (at least somewhat) shady (from the self moderated topic and removing that post to the laughable retaliatory trust feedbacks, also not forgetting about asking money for probably free service).

There is 0 service that asks for in depth analyse for free. If you can point me to a service which is up to date, that offers it for free, I will offer you as well for free a lifetime of BTC/ETH analyse which costs arround 200$ each.

Also just for aml score, very few do it for free, and from those, very few gather their own information. I know lots of people from this domain and those for free or that offer a trial, 95% are scams or inacurate.

Read again, I was not supporting Pi network, I was just stating facts. They have an exchange where to buy and sell crypto (huobi), they have main-net etc.

And about their request of KYC, I know what means privacy and I am against useless kyc in crypto world, but they are not the first to require it. And I saw most of the old members when other coins requested it, people to recommend it.

And again the shit pi network is one of the most used crypto out there, there are more pi in personal wallets as worldwide than btc's at the moment, even if it's shit and it is testnet. Pi has 50 mil downloads only on google play and Mycelium only 1 million, Metamask 10 mil only. Versus other scams, they did not ask yet for money from people. I do not praise Pi, but these are facts.

He doesn't have to be a scammer, because all this ''aml checks'' are already available for free with at least one website and one telegram bot.
This guy is probably using this free tools and he is charging people this ''service'' that can be done for free, and he is just trying to earn from this.
It's obvious that most of his posts are made in shitcoin boards, so no wonder he was supporting Pi Network crap, but I didn't saw anyone said he scammed someone.

Fuck off, you are just an idiot dear NewsletterBitcoin.


AML checks are illegal? Ok. I'm out of this thread, ignoring your replies from now on.

Don't hide under may or not may be/semantics. That's bs. You may be the killer of the age of reason.

I have just read this statement. What an idiot. Do not like NewsletterBitcoin aka GazetaBitcoin
Where the fuck else to deal idiot if not through pm's or discord lol. relay chat?

btw in my aml thread:
2 left.