First, you are an idiot seeking attention when someone disagrees with him.
Thank you. Your statement reflects your high level of education.
I was not against segwit as technology, I am against the compromises arround implementing segwit.
In multiple occasions I, NeuroticFish and PrivacyG asked you what specific issues you are talking about. You never replied. Reference: [1], [2], [3], [4].
you are the second after JollyJohnyBeGood who called me an alt of someone, from alt of eliale, now I am alt of andouluka.
I said that you may be but, most likely, your poor English skills prevent you from understanding the difference between "is" and "may be".
Well mr. NewsletterBitcoin fuck off.
Thanks again. Again, a high lever of education and moral standards.
Giving a feedback as opinion instead of actually doing a trade, means you have some mental frustration, probably momi issues
Probably you don't know how to properly use Trust feedback. If you look at the description of Neutral feedback you'll see: "Other comments".
This is exactly what my feedback is. For more information you can alsu use LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.
You are not incriminating me, you just don't know what you are talking about lol
I am not incriminating you yet. For the moment I am just raising alarm signals about you.
Translation using google cause I am lazy
No, you used Google because you don't know English. Sadly, you also don't know Romanian.
If being against something in this forum is giving the right to someone to accuse, I will leave it.
Be my guest.
Same happened with the case of JollyJonnyBeGood: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61200521
If JollyGood has more information about the way you are trying to scam people, I am kindly inviting him here. I feel though that saxydev will be walking on very thin ice if JollyGood will come here.
Self-topic is usually created to remove spam posts. And another reason can be for any type of contradictory post. Based on the screenshot you have provided I could not see any type of spamming. So, the post is contradictory to his/her post. And contradictory posts should be deleted by those who are scammers or likely to be a scammer.
Obviously. Needless to say, AML checks are allowed only to institutions authorized by authorities. Nobody would authorize an underclassman for performing AML check. My warning to other users is this in fact: as long as someone is illiterate enough to not be able even to spell his name, be very cautious. If the person is an imbecile then certainly a deal can go bad, as he does not understand what he's doing. If he knows what he's doing then his very low intellect may lead to other problems. If he's just an underclassman but agile in shenanigans, then most likely he'll try to scam you.
I had to unignore you to quote your post ;( ! A sad moment for me!
Oh no! Almost crying here. I'm sure shasan feels the same.
He's post is a spam.
Probably you wanted to type "his post" instead of "he's post". Then again: when you are an illiterate is difficult even to spell correctly "a-ha".
Accusing me in my thread of being the alt of someone else and saying that anti money laundering checks are scammy/illegal or dangerous is a SPAM.
AML checks are illegal, as long as they are not authorized by the govern. AML checks are not scammy but you are scammy. Last, but not least, AML checks are not dangerous; dealing with you is dangerous.
He did not made a constructive post to my thread and more I can delete any post in a self-moderated thread.
For other users the post was constructive. Same as this topic is.
Also he insulted me, so it's my right to delete his post.
What is the insult?
Unfortunately NewsletterBitcoin dissapointed me ;(
Now I'm really crying.
