Topic: Being a Smart Person or Strategic - page 45. (Read 16937 times)
It's nice to be smart but being strategically smart brings you to a whole new level, especially, when it comes to investments and trading.
I think there are different kinds of smarts, and ultimately it comes down to your goals. Someone who is a mathematical genius may not be 'smart' with their money, and could end up broke.
I think smart people may not be strategically strategic because they must be able to compile what will be planned with the stages that sudaj in stacking for maximum results, and smart people can only mengai in education is not necessarily able to strategize but if both in united it very good and will produce results very extraordinary and as expected.
Actually, you can do both you can be a smart person or being a strategic person. For example, you can use your knowledge in dealing life but it depends on your strategy on how you deal it. Being smart you are ether bookish or a street wise but it depends on how to you use your knowledge in being smart or being strategic, you need to be strategic in life to survive on its demanding needs. You may not be as witty on philosophical aspects but if you are strategic enough to overcome the practicalities in life, it would mean survival on this challenging world.
As per my view i like to stay smart as well as strategic at the same time.Well a smart person always foresee their future and set a good future goal and make wise investment.Some people will be smart but wont have strategic idea on what to do with their money and they won't have idea on how to utilize their money.A strategic person always find wise investment ideas and plans out how their investment is going to work out for them in the future.So its wise to be both smart and strategic.
I think that one of the definitions of a smart person is the presence of a strategy in his actions...so these concepts are similar
I think in order to be success, you have to be experienced and of course within a relative field, those with future, challenging and not repetitive, strategic is part of being smart for me in handling tasks, to simultaneously try something new while getting increasing experienced with my potential job feel, time and equal and people treat it differently, just be productive in something that you like and your efforts wouldn't be worthless over time.
Many people are being smart but they can optimize their live. It is may caused they do not know the ways how to face lives and optimize it. They can't do nothing unless just stay calms. Therefore, it needs abilities for them to be able to optimize and face lives. However, not all people can't reach it. Every one has different skills. Skill means that we can see the needs and ways when facing chance. We should be a strategic it this context. Being able to use the chance, good plan, using effective ways, and hard work. So, being smart is not enough, it is better to be smart and strategic.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Of course, being strategic one is way much better than being smart because i have seen some people who are naturally smart but still doesn't even tried to apply such things while the strategic one keeps on analyzing the situation before he act but then it still has a disadvantage. But if the person is smart and strategic, then i would probably say that he/she is a complete package about intellectual. For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
i think they are just the same the result just depends on people uniquely. Say, our goals, beliefs and aims stands as a factor to strategize and be smart.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Smart or Strategic? All I can say is, If you are a smart person, then you are also a strategic one. But you are right having mastered the both of them will lead to to success. But being a smart and strategic is not enough. You will also need experience in order to achieve your goals. For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Both being a smart person and strategic person are important skills that we should obtain for us to survive to the daily challenges that we face in our lives. But if youre only going to choose one, i think being strategic person is better than being smart. Not all problems can be solve by a smart person but a strategic person can. For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
If you're wise you will produce a golong term technique for your lietim as ell s your money. It's impossible how a smart individual cannot be proper, they go with each other hand by hand as characteristics. A good individual thinks forward and thinks outside the box so he'll develop a good strategy for his long term life and cash. If you do not plan in advance you aren't regarded as a smart person.od fewa
If you are talking about the bitcoin, you must be strategic on how you invest your money so you will be sure that your money increases after a long time.
I do agree if it's about bitcoin i probably choose being strategic person. Let's face the fact that not all smart person can do good in investing maybe some are good in academics but not in everything. But i am not saying that being strategic doesn't mean your not smart, it just the other side of being smart which will lead to your success. And also i am not saying that being smart doesn't mean your not strategic person and you will not succeed. Just my point of view. 
To succeed in business, I think both should be. Intelligent in stragegi is needed in business, especially in buying and selling in the world of crypto. Because if we are less strategic in making decisions then we will not get any profit.
I think being a smart person, shows that you are well in making a strategy as well. So no problem to pick on the two.
I preferably choose smart person because being smart can act very strategic as well.
No matter how you smart if you are not lucky you cant do anything...even you have a beter strategic if you are not lucky its nothing...
Both! Because for me, you need to have a strategic plan and a smart goal 
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Sir we can consider a strategic person a smart one also because it primarily uses mental ability also so why need to choose? It is obvious. Maybe it is better to choose on a person that "know the answer or the person that knows how to find the answer". In addition a smart or an intelligent person is devided into many other things.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
being a smart person is a top priority because it is the most special and the greatest because with the intelligence we can think of what we will do and what we will do.
Jump to: