The casino is accessible now, I dont see any license there unless I missed it but here is their terms related to verification as what you can read on their ToS page:
Starting from minimum deposit/withdrawal, allowed wallet to deposit, allowed wallet address to withdraw, etc.
In short, they do not allow players to deposit from 3rd party wallet and player is only allowed to withdraw to the address that is used to make the deposit.
Something uncommon for me and maybe for some other gamblers as well, so better to read the whole terms first if anyone is interested to play on this new casino as maybe this casino has more different terms compared to other casinos.
That's true, the casino website is up and running but I doubt if it would be a KYC free casino because upon accessing the website, the prompt I received first was relating to cookies acceptance which I think should be optional for visitors or potential clients who deems it fit accessing the website. I believe not every gambler fancies that cookies options and I think it is a wrong step at first to compel or make it compulsory that one must accept the cookies before they get registered on the casino. Why they not make it clear the stand of their casino so we could know if they are KYC free or not rather than putting such features of compulsorily accepting cookies.
These days people do not want to waste much time in the market space because there are lots of options available and other organisations making their platforms easier and more flexible for their potential clients to remain with them rather than losing out which I believe no casino is ready to do. If the team would see this, I think the should look into the cookies policy and making it optional and as well making their stand on KYC known rather than telling is that the possibilities of conducting identity check based on withdrawal and deposit.