What they should do is try to recover the way for them to believe in the project again and that is very Difficult,for me things like this are fractured, and if there is no way they want to Recover it,it is up to the team if they want to stay so,Personally, if I did everything possible because there is a fairly strong Infrastructure in the casino, there are many things to recover, one is the token, the other is that the casino is more interesting for the Players and to be able to have a better option for them to be interested in playing there.
I had already commented on this in the past that casino tokens are doomed to failure for the following reason: in this market there are already many older and more reliable casinos that have a very simple deposit and withdrawal system that accept many cryptocurrencies, most people in this market uses bitcoin and it makes more sense that in the casino they accept bitcoin and old and established altcoins as a payment method, when a casino creates without its own token, then this casino is risking having more operational cost, they will have to pay a debt to maintain the casino and another to take care of the token, in the long run this operating cost increases, because the devs also have other things to do
and the price of the token will be falling, for obvious reasons: the market is saturated, there are many altcoins and there are many casinos, the cost of listing altcoins on exchanges is also expensive and people want the token to be listed on the best exchanges and when the casino cannot do this, so people get frustrated and also end up directing this frustration at the casino, that is, they look at the casino as incompetent. I don't know how far the team thought when they created this token, but time will tell if I'm wrong
It is very difficult to fight against a system that already has many things in context, first of all, as you say, the market is very volatile, unstable, with uncertainty, this is not going well for a market that has to do with tokens, tokens are alternatives to bitcoin and some cryptocurrencies, it is faster to do them and build a very alternative market that is still dependent on bitcoin movements, there is nothing like it or that depends on other things, it will always be like this, when we see it from another point of view Come to the same conclusion, altcoins, and tokens will always be under the same classification.
I think this is the very first time I am coming across someone advising against using Google authenticator , why exactly is good authenticator not good, I personally have been using it for as far as I can remember, maybe since 3 or 4 years ago, I've never encountered any issue of any kind, so I am very curious to know exactly why you are advising against using google authenticator, and what other better authenticators do you recommend.?.
Well, it's not that I advise against it, it's just that there are others that are better, and yes, of course, it can be, in terms of security, things can progress a lot and we haven't realized it , personally I've always used 2FA, but let's remember the hack that was done to Binance, where all the 2FA were violated and that's how they managed to do the big robbery , it's interesting to know that there are always good options to learn and apply as security.
