Pages:
Author

Topic: BetKing.io - BKB token REFUNDS - $70k refunded so far - page 4. (Read 27584 times)

sr. member
Activity: 395
Merit: 264
there is still a good chance for BKB to reach higher amount comparing it to BTC

Maybe if every single dice site goes under.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1021
Here's a page that details all our sports betting rules
https://betking.io/sports-betting-rules/


Also note that if you see anything you want to bet on but the odds are worse than other sites PLEASE get in touch so we can improve them!
We have tried to be the best on soccer during the world cup but other markets may need tweaking.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1804
guess who's back
I haven't been  that much active in the last week , but so glad that you unlocked the thread Dean
anyways even btc went up a lot and investors lost btc due to that there is still plenty of time and BKB may reach 2$ someday , can't blame Dean for what investors already agreed on ( if you want more btc next time participate in a BTC project ) 

I just want to see Betking growing and the development continues , it's one of my favorite sites to play and I want it to be better

attacking Dean or the site won't help , investors agreed on the terms and if they regret it then they can only blame their selves and as I said there is still a good chance for BKB to reach higher amount comparing it to BTC
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 507
It's obvious game-prtotect and jolly good are the same person.

12 messages in a row of just them two posting within a few minutes of each other with no one else discussing. Especially lacking any actual token holders in this thread.

If you look at their post history too they both said positive or neutral things about BetKing until I said game-protect could not be an affiliate of BetKing.
You said weeks ago that Game Protect can not participate in your new affiliate system. And even though you scammed all your affiliates with deleting the statistic of all lifetime referred players I did not say anything against you or opened a scam accusation, because I do not care about your incompetent run casino.

However, opposed to the affiliate issue, your investment scam draw my attention after Jolly Good has started to post about it.

Therefore, your assumption that your investment scam draw my attention because I could not be an affiliate is all but accurate!


It would be hard for two people to post the same nonsense over and over again and both are incapable of doing very basic research and lack total common sense, never mind business sense.
To research your investment fraud scheme is a breeze for me as a private investigator. Cheesy

If someone wants to read nonsense, simply go to https://betking.io/ico and read in the thread BetKing.io Is it a blatant scam? for further explanation.

I quote the statements from your website and if you claim it is nonsense, then you confirm that the content on your website is nonsense! Cheesy


I've asked mods and theymos to ban this guy and encouraged other sites that he tries to blackmail or extort to do the same.
I have no idea where you learned this or how you came to this thought, but scammers Game Protect is going after can not get away with requesting to ban the truth!

Please show proof where Game Protect tried to blackmail or extort other sites?

Why did no one file a criminal complaint against Game Protect?


There's tonnes of threads of real players complaining about this guy spamming the forums.
How do you know who is behind those anonymous bitcointalk accounts?

The criminal casinos and their paid influencers complain about online gaming consumer protection, not the real players! The real players do not have any disadvantage caused by the existence of Game Protect. The opposite is the case! Hundreds of real player victims submitted their scam to us and asked for help.


I would encourage everyone to not fall for any scams or extortion attempts made by game-protect like he has tried with other users on the forum (see their trust ratings and the dodgy legal service he claims to provide).
Did you open scam accusations like it is very common here on bitcointalk? If not, why not? (Until today not one of those anonymous accounts complaining about Game Protect answered these questions!)

You scammed all your affiliates with deleting the statistic of all lifetime referred players! As it meanwhile turned out, not the first time you breached your promises!

You scammed all your investors with not fulfilling the investment contract! You announced to spend 30% of the tokens = $ 1,95 million for ICO bounties, testing bounties, advisors, hiring, future marketing and development, while in reality you did not even spend a fraction of it to marketing and develop the casino!

Despite your contradictional and misleading statements making the investment offer anyway invalid! These are facts opposed to your false and misleading allegations!
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
This website at Betking has caused immense issues for ICO investors being of the dubious manner in which they were sold something that quite frankly was not all it was made out to be.

The person who did all that was Dean Nolan, the owner and operator of Betking.

Since a few of us have started asking him questions regarding the way he became a millionaire overnight thanks to the ICO in September 2017 but which left investors out of pocket, he has started to panic. Some new and coming soon games are now being offered on the Betking website, the "new" roulette is exactly the same one he had previously plugged in and removed because it was a failure and then need an ICO to allegedly pay developers for  Roll Eyes

Dean Nolan has stepped up his PR campaign using the same ICO funds received to try to manage the damage to his failed Betking website. Tragedy really, moreso for the investors that lost everything while Dean Nolan does not even feel he has to account for how and where the ICO funds were spent.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1021
Can you add Chelsea - Manchester City for tomorrow, its FA community shield

Added now
Thanks
copper member
Activity: 445
Merit: 308
Can you add Chelsea - Manchester City for tomorrow, its FA community shield
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1021
Thanks for the thread bump jolly good. Glad you are a fan of the site.
You should join the Litecoin wagering competition we have right now, great value
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
After day one here are the leaderboard standings on betking.io

Note that 10 players get paid in each leaderboard and there's only a few people in the ETH or LTC competition so far, easy to win a prize!

Stop it Dean Nolan, nobody wants to wage their funds on the Betking website because of the way the ICO investors lost everything on your Betking token based system while you made millions in US$ for yourself !
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1021
After day one here are the leaderboard standings on betking.io

Note that 10 players get paid in each leaderboard and there's only a few people in the ETH or LTC competition so far, easy to win a prize!


Bitcoin



Ethereum



Litecoin

legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1021
Join in our new wagering contest

We have 3 leaderboards, one for each of the 3 currencies we support, Bitcoin, Ethereum and Litecoin.

We are giving away 0.5 Bitcoin, 10 Ethereum AND 50 Litecoin in prizes.

See this thread for more details

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/betkingio-new-wagering-contest-3-prizepools-05-bitcoin-10-eth-and-50-ltc-4811245
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1021
2 pages of clueless people in this thread. Nice.

Just to clarify one point though. The 25 btc donated to charity was my own money and not investors.

Have a think, BetKing closed with a profit of 7300 Bitcoin and we were taking 50% commission in the last year (25% wagered, 25% profit) and I was usually in the top 3 biggest investors of the site bankroll (I'm also the biggest investor in the ICO),

Think it's safe to assume I was in a position to donate 25 Bitcoin of my own.

Also regarding ICO, I own 70% of all tokens now, that's a lot of Bitcoin returned to holders.

If this turns into another 2 pages of trolls and idiots then I'll lock this and start a moderated thread. Or just ignore Bitcointalk completely. All investors are on Telegram anyway.

Betking made very little of it's Bitcoin in the last year. Things had slowed down considerably - that's why you tried to sell the site twice before doing the ICO. You ran at 200% ev and disingenuously used that profit number as a selling point for the ICO. Why try and lie and say the 25 BTC was your own money? Obviously, you HAD 25 BTC before the ICO but let's be real... you were giving back 70-90% to investors when all the big profit on your site was being made when Bitcoin was sub-$1000. To try and pretend after profiting 1400 BTC from the poor ICO investors that the 25 BTC didn't come out of the ICO funds is just stupid. Do you even still have Poker on your site or is it just the Dice and sportsbetting? Explain again why you needed $6.5 million dollars to license a sportsbook from a third party and to build your own proprietary dice game that you already had pre-ICO? The site looks pretty much exactly the same as it did 12 months ago. I dunno how you continue to fool these investors of yours but I've gotta give it to you, you're a good salesman.

BetKIng made over 3000 Bitcoin in it's last year. Stop talking nonsense. These are easily verifiable facts.

Face it, you have no clue what you are talking about. You know very little of BetKings history. You know absolutely NOTHING about BetKing post ICO and how the business is run. You don't know how to run a business yourself.
You are just jealous, you always have been because your site failed.

Thread locked as I'm not wasting time now with trolls and no one else uses this thread to keep up with BetKing by the looks of it.

You can keep up with news on the site here https://t.me/betkingcasino

edit:

It's obvious game-prtotect and jolly good are the same person.

12 messages in a row in their own thread of just them two posting within a few minutes of each other with no one else discussing. Especially lacking any actual token holders in that thread.

If you look at their post history too they both said positive or neutral things about BetKing until I said game-protect could not be an affiliate of BetKing.

It would be hard for two people to post the same nonsense over and over again and both are incapable of doing very basic research and lack total common sense, never mind business sense.

I've asked mods and theymos to ban this guy and encouraged other sites that he tries to blackmail or extort to do the same. There's tonnes of threads of real players complaining about this guy spamming the forums.

I would encourage everyone to not fall for any scams or extortion attempts made by game-protect like he has tried with other users on the forum (see their trust ratings and the dodgy legal service he claims to provide).

sr. member
Activity: 395
Merit: 264
2 pages of clueless people in this thread. Nice.

Just to clarify one point though. The 25 btc donated to charity was my own money and not investors.

Have a think, BetKing closed with a profit of 7300 Bitcoin and we were taking 50% commission in the last year (25% wagered, 25% profit) and I was usually in the top 3 biggest investors of the site bankroll (I'm also the biggest investor in the ICO),

Think it's safe to assume I was in a position to donate 25 Bitcoin of my own.

Also regarding ICO, I own 70% of all tokens now, that's a lot of Bitcoin returned to holders.

If this turns into another 2 pages of trolls and idiots then I'll lock this and start a moderated thread. Or just ignore Bitcointalk completely. All investors are on Telegram anyway.

Betking made very little of it's Bitcoin in the last year. Things had slowed down considerably - that's why you tried to sell the site twice before doing the ICO. You ran at 200% ev and disingenuously used that profit number as a selling point for the ICO. Why try and lie and say the 25 BTC was your own money? Obviously, you HAD 25 BTC before the ICO but let's be real... you were giving back 70-90% to investors when all the big profit on your site was being made when Bitcoin was sub-$1000. To try and pretend after profiting 1400 BTC from the poor ICO investors that the 25 BTC didn't come out of the ICO funds is just stupid. Do you even still have Poker on your site or is it just the Dice and sportsbetting? Explain again why you needed $6.5 million dollars to license a sportsbook from a third party and to build your own proprietary dice game that you already had pre-ICO? The site looks pretty much exactly the same as it did 12 months ago. I dunno how you continue to fool these investors of yours but I've gotta give it to you, you're a good salesman.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1021
2 pages of clueless people in this thread. Nice.

Just to clarify one point though. The 25 btc donated to charity was my own money and not investors.

Have a think, BetKing closed with a profit of 7300 Bitcoin and we were taking 50% commission in the last year (25% wagered, 25% profit) and I was usually in the top 3 biggest investors of the site bankroll (I'm also the biggest investor in the ICO),

Think it's safe to assume I was in a position to donate 25 Bitcoin of my own.

Also regarding ICO, I own 70% of all tokens now, that's a lot of Bitcoin returned to holders.

If this turns into another 2 pages of trolls and idiots then I'll lock this and start a moderated thread. Or just ignore Bitcointalk completely. All investors are on Telegram anyway.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
You guys are missing the incredibly obvious.

At the time of the ICO, the amount of crypto raised is priced in USD and the token is valued in USD. However by Dean's own admission he holds the crypto and never sold for USD. This means if the value of the crypto goes up (like it has) Dean personally gets free money. But if the value of the crypto went down, Dean can just fold betking up or even just say it can't afford to do buy backs. Which is true.


So the whole betking ICO was just a way for Dean to expose himself to profit if crypto went up, and expose himself to nothing if it went down. This is why he has no real reason to work on the site, it was never about it.

But being blunt, it's completely investors fault for buying into it. The terms were straight forward and obvious. They bought into the ICO mania, and will need to pay for it.
sr. member
Activity: 395
Merit: 264
On a positive note, Dean did decide to give his excess funds gained from the ICO partly for good when he gave away 25 bitcoin around Christmas when Bitcoin spiked to $20k. So, at least he didn't just keep ALL of the excess funds he raised in the ICO. Choosing to giveaway ~$400k to charity of your investors money I'm sure sat real well with them particularly given the complete lack of development in the last 18 months. Was giving away investor funds in the roadmap as well?

Please clarify how much exactly was raised in the ICO. What do you mean by Dean "gave away to charity"?

If Dean gave away 25 BTC then how much was raised?

~$6.5 million when BTC price was around $4.5k

 Shocked

He might have but I cannot recall him ever stating how much went towards development and how much directly towards bankroll. Either way if around 1400 BTC was raised then that is too much for a project such as this.

I thought a couple of hundred BTC at most were raised in the ICO maybe I got it wrong?

Dean at one point estimated ~50% of the funds raised would go towards the bankroll, and the other half going towards any other site related costs (legal, development, marketing, expenses, licensing, etc.)

Good luck finding out where that $~3.25 million that was supposed to go towards all that went, let alone the other half considering the site is basically dead and you don't need that much in the bankroll.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
On a positive note, Dean did decide to give his excess funds gained from the ICO partly for good when he gave away 25 bitcoin around Christmas when Bitcoin spiked to $20k. So, at least he didn't just keep ALL of the excess funds he raised in the ICO. Choosing to giveaway ~$400k to charity of your investors money I'm sure sat real well with them particularly given the complete lack of development in the last 18 months. Was giving away investor funds in the roadmap as well?

Please clarify how much exactly was raised in the ICO. What do you mean by Dean "gave away to charity"?

If Dean gave away 25 BTC then how much was raised?

~$6.5 million when BTC price was around $4.5k

 Shocked

He might have but I cannot recall him ever stating how much went towards development and how much directly towards bankroll. Either way if around 1400 BTC was raised then that is too much for a project such as this.

I thought a couple of hundred BTC at most were raised in the ICO maybe I got it wrong?
sr. member
Activity: 395
Merit: 264
On a positive note, Dean did decide to give his excess funds gained from the ICO partly for good when he gave away 25 bitcoin around Christmas when Bitcoin spiked to $20k. So, at least he didn't just keep ALL of the excess funds he raised in the ICO. Choosing to giveaway ~$400k to charity of your investors money I'm sure sat real well with them particularly given the complete lack of development in the last 18 months. Was giving away investor funds in the roadmap as well?

Please clarify how much exactly was raised in the ICO. What do you mean by Dean "gave away to charity"?

If Dean gave away 25 BTC then how much was raised?

~$6.5 million when BTC price was around $4.5k
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
On a positive note, Dean did decide to give his excess funds gained from the ICO partly for good when he gave away 25 bitcoin around Christmas when Bitcoin spiked to $20k. So, at least he didn't just keep ALL of the excess funds he raised in the ICO. Choosing to giveaway ~$400k to charity of your investors money I'm sure sat real well with them particularly given the complete lack of development in the last 18 months. Was giving away investor funds in the roadmap as well?

Please clarify how much exactly was raised in the ICO. What do you mean by Dean "gave away to charity"?

If Dean gave away 25 BTC then how much was raised?
sr. member
Activity: 395
Merit: 264
On a positive note, Dean did decide to give his excess funds gained from the ICO partly for good when he gave away 25 bitcoin around Christmas when Bitcoin spiked to $20k. So, at least he didn't just keep ALL of the excess funds he raised in the ICO. Choosing to giveaway ~$400k to charity of your investors money I'm sure sat real well with them particularly given the complete lack of development in the last 18 months. Was giving away investor funds in the roadmap as well?
Pages:
Jump to: