Where can I sell my bkb tokens?
Ask the thread mod or send him a PM.
Topic: BetKing.io - BKB token REFUNDS - $70k refunded so far - page 5. (Read 27647 times)
Ask the thread mod or send him a PM.
Where can I sell my bkb tokens?
When I login at BetKing I am not able to find the affiliate stats anymore and when I try to login with my BetKing details at https://betking.io/affiliate-program it does not work?
Why would anyone want to affiliate with you?
Good to see that, again, you admit that your spamming and lies is only for "financial gains"
I just used the IGNORE button again 
@ JollyGood
Why do not you answer my question?
To who do you have to pay a license fee if you have your own custom coded specially developed software?
Why do not you answer my question?
Now this is what I thought was happening but was told that they site was custom coded with custom coded specially deveopled software. So all the software on the Betking website is licenced? If that is true then why indeed was there an ICO especially if her tried to sell the site in the past.
To who do you have to pay a license fee if you have your own custom coded specially developed software?
I've heard Cubeia poker software costs ~$500. Could be wrong, even way off. Even if it was $10000 though (it's not) that's a tiny, tiny fraction of what you raised.
Go ahead and focus on semantics to distract from my overall point though. And yes, I do keep up with this because I invested time into trying to stop people from investing in this ICO from the beginning because I knew better. The fact the site is basically abandoned and people lost very large sums of money in the process really sucks for those people. You try to justify it by going on about the USD token value when it's just completely absurd and disingenuous. Then again, you've gotta be able to sleep at night after taking all their crypto so I understand it.
Sorry to all those who invested out there.
Go ahead and focus on semantics to distract from my overall point though. And yes, I do keep up with this because I invested time into trying to stop people from investing in this ICO from the beginning because I knew better. The fact the site is basically abandoned and people lost very large sums of money in the process really sucks for those people. You try to justify it by going on about the USD token value when it's just completely absurd and disingenuous. Then again, you've gotta be able to sleep at night after taking all their crypto so I understand it.
Sorry to all those who invested out there.
@ game-protect
chazley seems to know what he is talking about
Now this is what I thought was happening but was told that they site was custom coded with custom coded specially deveopled software. So all the software on the Betking website is licenced? If that is true then why indeed was there an ICO especially if her tried to sell the site in the past.
To who do you have to pay a license fee if you have your own custom coded specially developed software?
Now this is what I thought was happening but was told that they site was custom coded with custom coded specially deveopled software. So all the software on the Betking website is licenced? If that is true then why indeed was there an ICO especially if her tried to sell the site in the past.
Also if this was the second incarnation of the Betking website why was the first one closed down? Why did Dean have to come back and raise money for an ICO if the website was his and there was no need for an ICO?
I think he said he needed an ICO for bankroll tokens but what percentage of the ICO was used for bankroll tokens? If 90% of the ICO went towards the bankroll then I suppose it was clearly must have been stated in the whitepaper so it is all fine but if say 5% of the ICO went to the bankroll and 80% went on "development" which was a backdoor for Dean getting the funds on alraedy developed website then that is very bad.
Please clarify how much exactly was raised in the ICO.
Also if this was the second incarnation of the Betking website why was the first one closed down? Why did Dean have to come back and raise money for an ICO if the website was his and there was no need for an ICO?
I think he said he needed an ICO for bankroll tokens but what percentage of the ICO was used for bankroll tokens? If 90% of the ICO went towards the bankroll then I suppose it was clearly must have been stated in the whitepaper so it is all fine but if say 5% of the ICO went to the bankroll and 80% went on "development" which was a backdoor for Dean getting the funds on alraedy developed website then that is very bad.
Please clarify how much exactly was raised in the ICO.
What happened to your Cubeia Poker?
I think no one ways playing Poker.
jr. member
Activity: 116
Merit: 1
Your GateWay to Bitcoin Gambling Greatness
What happened to your Cubeia Poker?
I think he said he needed an ICO for bankroll tokens but what percentage of the ICO was used for bankroll tokens? If 90% of the ICO went towards the bankroll then I suppose it was clearly must have been stated in the whitepaper so it is all fine but if say 5% of the ICO went to the bankroll and 80% went on "development" which was a backdoor for Dean getting the funds on alraedy developed website then that is very bad.
Your suggestion that only 5% of the collected money went to the bankroll is absolute nonsense! 
Let us assume ICO collected $ 1 million and 5% = $50,000 went to the bankroll and 95% = $950,000 to the development. Can you see the nonsense of your suggestion?
Usually around 80 -90% of the money collected goes to the bankroll and rest to development / other expenses.
Those were examples. Maybe 50% went to bankroll tokens, maybe 75% went there I do not know. I was asking for clarification.
You are obviously clueless about casino operations and calculations.
I think he said he needed an ICO for bankroll tokens but what percentage of the ICO was used for bankroll tokens? If 90% of the ICO went towards the bankroll then I suppose it was clearly must have been stated in the whitepaper so it is all fine but if say 5% of the ICO went to the bankroll and 80% went on "development" which was a backdoor for Dean getting the funds on alraedy developed website then that is very bad.
Your suggestion that only 5% of the collected money went to the bankroll is absolute nonsense! Let us assume ICO collected $ 1 million and 5% = $50,000 went to the bankroll and 95% = $950,000 to the development. Can you see the nonsense of your suggestion?
Usually around 80 -90% of the money collected goes to the bankroll and rest to development / other expenses.
Those were examples. Maybe 50% went to bankroll tokens, maybe 75% went there I do not know. I was asking for clarification.
I think he said he needed an ICO for bankroll tokens but what percentage of the ICO was used for bankroll tokens? If 90% of the ICO went towards the bankroll then I suppose it was clearly must have been stated in the whitepaper so it is all fine but if say 5% of the ICO went to the bankroll and 80% went on "development" which was a backdoor for Dean getting the funds on alraedy developed website then that is very bad.
Your suggestion that only 5% of the collected money went to the bankroll is absolute nonsense! Let us assume ICO collected $ 1 million and 5% = $50,000 went to the bankroll and 95% = $950,000 to the development. Can you see the nonsense of your suggestion?
Usually around 80 -90% of the money collected goes to the bankroll and rest to development / other expenses.
@chazley
Go pm each other. He's not got a clue about anything and you refuse to listen to actual site owner. Wasting your time.
I won't respond to either of your posts from now.
You're missing the point (intentionally of course). Why was an ICO required for you to buy some cheap, licensed HTML5 poker software that really brings very little value to the site anyway? I highly doubt the games ever run on Betking.
Now this is what I thought was happening but was told that they site was custom coded with custom coded specially deveopled software. So all the software on the Betking website is licenced? If that is true then why indeed was there an ICO especially if her tried to sell the site in the past.
Also if this was the second incarnation of the Betking website why was the first one closed down? Why did Dean have to come back and raise money for an ICO if the website was his and there was no need for an ICO?
I think he said he needed an ICO for bankroll tokens but what percentage of the ICO was used for bankroll tokens? If 90% of the ICO went towards the bankroll then I suppose it was clearly must have been stated in the whitepaper so it is all fine but if say 5% of the ICO went to the bankroll and 80% went on "development" which was a backdoor for Dean getting the funds on alraedy developed website then that is very bad.
Please clarify how much exactly was raised in the ICO.
@chazley
We now have a Chinese language version of the site, https://betking.io/zh
Past few days we've seen a highroller win over 8 Bitcoin on BetKing.io
He's betting on 5x payout and ran pretty good
He's betting on 5x payout and ran pretty good
You're missing the point (intentionally of course). Why was an ICO required for you to buy some cheap, licensed HTML5 poker software that really brings very little value to the site anyway? I highly doubt the games ever run on Betking.
Now this is what I thought was happening but was told that they site was custom coded with custom coded specially deveopled software. So all the software on the Betking website is licenced? If that is true then why indeed was there an ICO especially if her tried to sell the site in the past.
Also if this was the second incarnation of the Betking website why was the first one closed down? Why did Dean have to come back and raise money for an ICO if the website was his and there was no need for an ICO?
I think he said he needed an ICO for bankroll tokens but what percentage of the ICO was used for bankroll tokens? If 90% of the ICO went towards the bankroll then I suppose it was clearly must have been stated in the whitepaper so it is all fine but if say 5% of the ICO went to the bankroll and 80% went on "development" which was a backdoor for Dean getting the funds on alraedy developed website then that is very bad.
Please clarify how much exactly was raised in the ICO.
I've heard Cubeia poker software costs ~$500. Could be wrong, even way off. Even if it was $10000 though (it's not) that's a tiny, tiny fraction of what you raised.
Go ahead and focus on semantics to distract from my overall point though. And yes, I do keep up with this because I invested time into trying to stop people from investing in this ICO from the beginning because I knew better. The fact the site is basically abandoned and people lost very large sums of money in the process really sucks for those people. You try to justify it by going on about the USD token value when it's just completely absurd and disingenuous. Then again, you've gotta be able to sleep at night after taking all their crypto so I understand it.
Sorry to all those who invested out there.
Go ahead and focus on semantics to distract from my overall point though. And yes, I do keep up with this because I invested time into trying to stop people from investing in this ICO from the beginning because I knew better. The fact the site is basically abandoned and people lost very large sums of money in the process really sucks for those people. You try to justify it by going on about the USD token value when it's just completely absurd and disingenuous. Then again, you've gotta be able to sleep at night after taking all their crypto so I understand it.
Sorry to all those who invested out there.
Yeah you are dead wrong. Phone them up and ask how much it is to setup and pay every month.
Also, you obviously didn't notice but BetKing has made as much profit or more than most other dice sites in tha past 9 months. Hardly abandoned.
You're missing the point (intentionally of course). Why was an ICO required for you to buy some cheap, licensed HTML5 poker software that really brings very little value to the site anyway? I highly doubt the games ever run on Betking.
I've heard Cubeia poker software costs ~$500. Could be wrong, even way off. Even if it was $10000 though (it's not) that's a tiny, tiny fraction of what you raised.
Go ahead and focus on semantics to distract from my overall point though. And yes, I do keep up with this because I invested time into trying to stop people from investing in this ICO from the beginning because I knew better. The fact the site is basically abandoned and people lost very large sums of money in the process really sucks for those people. You try to justify it by going on about the USD token value when it's just completely absurd and disingenuous. Then again, you've gotta be able to sleep at night after taking all their crypto so I understand it.
Sorry to all those who invested out there.
Go ahead and focus on semantics to distract from my overall point though. And yes, I do keep up with this because I invested time into trying to stop people from investing in this ICO from the beginning because I knew better. The fact the site is basically abandoned and people lost very large sums of money in the process really sucks for those people. You try to justify it by going on about the USD token value when it's just completely absurd and disingenuous. Then again, you've gotta be able to sleep at night after taking all their crypto so I understand it.
Sorry to all those who invested out there.
I remember recently asking Dean about the licencing of software and why an ICO was needed for that but he said the gaming was custom coded and needed paying for. He also said that it was just some sporting event part that he was licencing (I think).
I am confused.
By the way what was the total raised in US$ in the ICO?
Yea... he misled everybody. The ICO was a horrible deal for people who were investing in the bankroll with Bitcoin compared to buying tokens which essentially was just a huge money grab for Dean.
Dean had tried twice, unsuccessfully, to sell Betking prior to the ICO. He had already checked out mentally and was looking to cash out. He got his big payday, in the process screwing over investors. He never really cared about that though. People made a choice to invest, that is on them. There is no law against taking advantage of stupid people.
He raised several million dollars worth (today's value) of Bitcoin during the ICO.
Jump to: