~snip~
The difference is clearly visible, slots are games that are bet on and operate with machines where there is a system that works to run this game, while football betting is a sports bet that is directly related to the course of a match that is taking place.
But regarding the house edge, I need to say that the house edge can't do anything to beat gamblers in football sports betting, especially because the winning outcome is determined by the competing team, not the house edge.
But on the other hand the house edge cannot beat gamblers on sports betting they can still give very low odds against a team that has a high chance of winning the match.
The opportunity for gamblers to outsmart the low odds given by the house edge is only one, by placing more bets because when placing bets earlier the odds are still slightly higher.
True, at the end of the day the difference appears in the estimation of the odds. In games like roulette, or slots, etc, the odds are fixed and simple to calculate, say, 1 in 6 to roll a 4 on a dice. It's done, then the casino pays less than those odds, and that's the game.
For the sports bets though, that's a different story because the odds change all the time. Even in half time for example the reality has changed and the odds need to be updated. What remains the same is that the casino always pays less than what their estimated odds would indicate.
Yes, because in betting a game, the odds that will be generated can already be seen when we play it and it's not us who determine the odds, but the house.
The game that you mentioned is going according to the plan made by the provider so we don't know what will happen or it can be said that there is no clarity or certainty about the game opportunities.
I wonder friends why some people equate betting on games and sports betting.
As you said, I agree, because sports betting has odds that will change from time to time depending on the course of the match, so that will provide more certain odds for our bets.