I support Proof of Giving (POG),
Proof of Distributed Computing (PODC) is awesome, but it has its flaws, relying on centralized servers for verification, etc, Swongel pointed this stuff out long ago when the work was first being started:
https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?action=profile;u=223 >>> "Recent Posts", I think his best posts were deleted though sadly, but Rob later mentioned Swongel being right about some stuff when he started his work on POG
I think the flipping point for Rob was a while back mentioned he tried to get 5 "regular" people in his life into BiblePay mining, none of them could set it up LOL, I think a lot of you do not realize how smart you guys are at computers compared to regular people, [I had to teach my Mom how to create New Folders on her PC a few years ago LOL]
I dont know how things will end up, the crypto winter has been brutal, but we shall see how it goes!
I'll take the bait and reply to this, since for the most part Togo, you have been a great asset to BiblePay and I want to thank you for all you have done for us. We were excited about this project together and put our life into it for a year - and we both know that a large attribute of the decline of our price is the HODL crash itself.
So what Togo is saying is that Swongel made the argument at one point in time, that a mining algorithm that requires an oracle is only as good as the trustworthiness of the oracle. And even back then privately I agreed with him (so its not really technically that Im flip flopping), its that I held the true belief that we could overcome the trustworthiness of the Oracle, by writing reports that would give PODC credibility.
Another words, I believed that using a third party (BOINC) to report RAC was a manageable risk, but at the time I believed we could overcome the risk by maintaining a tamper-proof environment (IE a report that alerts us of any 3rd party credit tampering). But since then, the new information supplied to me was that my friends and family even told me what is stopping them from mining on biblepay is PODC is too complicated. This alone caused me to research POG (and of course alternative CPU mining algorithms) to replace PODC. It is true however that (a man must provide as much backing as possible when one is in an endeavor) one of the aspects of PODC that was communicated to me (not by Swongel himself) and I always had it in the back of my mind, is that some larger whales will not invest in coins without a hard consensus (another words, they dont really care if we consider our Oracle to be 100% trustworthy because we have advanced alerts and reports), they simply say, can this blockchain be reconciled 100% by itself without an oracle, if not I'm not touching that coin. Its been on my mind and it is a concern; as financial systems should be 100% trustworthy; the code is public, the emissions are public, the emission rate, the supply, and where the mining is going is 100% reconcilable in POG. So I admit I didnt jump on the bandwagon with that last point until we got to where we were when I considered POG for ease-of-use. If you analyze the top 100 coins, they don't rely on oracles. The only place for oracles is in betting (IE the oracle is used to settle a smart contract that people already escrowed - in contrast to coinbase rewards).
So technically, we have not achieved the whale blessing test yet; until we : Open pog up to the full reward schedule, disable PODC, and optionally our dash rebase. We would then potentially be 'whale approved' (possibly).