For the rest, I know another project that dispatches block rewards to masternodes in a regular way: in our case that would mean : Sanctuaries would get xx% of each block's reward, whatever the way the block was found. Maybe I misunderstood westwarmoth's suggestion, but I think it's not that far.
Basically, I would like to see two daily Superblocks. One for PoDC (which we have) and one equal sized one for Sanctuaries. Then at the block time, the system would look at which Sanctuaries were enabled and pay each one from the Sanctuary Superblock. So at block 75,040 there was a PoDC Superblock worth 1,077,065 BBP, and what I'm proposing is at block 75,145 we'd have a Sanctuary Superblock also worth 1,077,065 BBP (subject of course to the 1.5% deflationary emissions modifier). That superblock would be equally divided among the 336 enabled Sanctuaries, so each would get roughly 3205 BBP.
I don't see the benefit of doing this - its a change that is rooted in - ? Paying a consistent amount to sancs? Then you could add a proposal to remove DGW. Imo - Ive explained a couple times why DGW is good for us, so I would vote against it.
A while back I emailed you the idea of having you investigate other proof-of-document-storage coins that are live and floated the idea of installing their software and evaluating each one. Have you considered doing that yet or would you like us to ask someone else to do it?
DGW (Dark Gravity Wave) does not require you to change the payout amount. It is just a difficulty algorithm that adjust difficulty for the next mined block. How can we accurately say PoBH and PoDC will receive a specific percentage of the block reward if the payout amount differs due to PoW difficulty?