Rob wants to work with us on improving the MN voting system to make it more balanced and democratic. Yesterday he said that he will not vote inappropriately with his sanc weight.
He also suggested that we "construct a true case for an improvement and discuss it for a while amongst each other - and then give it to a director that represents biblepay in a full coherent way and then forward to me."
It should be relatively simple to do this. Let's put our heads together and come up with a reasonable limit on the number of votes that any multiple MN owner casts for a proposal. The vote-limit number can be based on a percentage of the total voting MNs.
While the number of votes would be limited for each MN owner, they could still continue to own as many MNs as they choose.
Since there probably is no way to enforce compliance for every current or future MN whale, this would be a voluntary limit with compliance overseen by the community. We ultimately have to rely on the Lord for a good outcome. As long as we do His will, we will be successful.
What are your thoughts?
He said "You will all just have to trust that I won't vote inappropriately with my sanc weight." The phrasing of this concerns me a bit, but let's see how things progress.
I agree if there are guidelines he agrees to, this would be awesome.
And we're still waiting to hear who the directors are.. This makes it a bit hard to communicate with them.
despite that, I would propose something along the lines of:
1. Don't vote for your own proposals (or if you must limit to 5? votes)
2. Limit voting on general proposals to less than 10% of the "Active" masternodes.