Just to be clear, I thought it was stated in the reddit forum by current gridcoin lead that Rob left on good terms? I just don't want to mix up current tensions with past history if it isn't correct.
Rob gave up the private key gridcoin foundation. I wonder what he Really thinks versus what is stated in public. It's not good business to speak your mind sometimes.
Exactly. If I were the GridCoin lead dev, I would never say in public something like "Yeah, he was like this and this and we kicked him out". GRC lead dev actually wrote a diplomatic/euphemistic/evasive/unclear sentence which may as well hide whatever you like -
quote from Reddit:
He just had a different vision than what the community voted for and opted to take another path.
Now think for a moment about this sentence. Do you really think it's possible that someone would dedicate months or years of work toward a project with love, and then after a community votes for a different path, he's like "alright guys, see ya!", just like that, without batting an eye? Of course there had to be some drama and emotions, it would be impossible otherwise, especially knowing Rob.
Also, that same quote from Reddit is totally unrelated to
the previous comment which said the blockchain stopped after a code commit by Rob, which was obviously referring to some time
before July 2017 (before BiblePay was born), yet Den Ravonska says:
[Nobody was] mad at Rob for chain breakage. In fact, he had nothing to do with the forkapocalypse of early 2018.
What the what?! It's like the previous comment asked if it was Rob's fault for the "forkapocalypse" of
2018, which doesn't make any sense. Why would something which happened in GRC in 2018 have anything to do with Rob which was working on BBP at the time? Why would he even mention something so unrelated? Or
was it unrelated? In any case, his message is highly confusing and doesn't say anything concrete, except mentioning some random unrelated event.
Also, the parent comment said:
[...] an update he did made the GRC blockchain stop.
And Den's message says:
These are all incorrect.
But the same Den's message also says:
We did not split part on bad terms, nor was anyone mad at Rob for chain breakage.
Lol. So he is outright lying in the post, saying it's incorrect that the chain broke and then saying that it
did broke.
So that was an absolute trash of a message from that guy.
By the way, I see there's another deleted message in that Reddit thread which I didn't see before, so here it is for posterity:
I have a massive issue with this. Now that it is public knowledge I can now be more candid. Rob's non-disclosure of GridCoin is a major breach of trust and I will explain why.
A forum post during the month of January on the BitCoinTalk Forum suggested that "heat mining" be tied to cycles for science by a random user. Rob immediately dog-piles on that and presents this "aha!" moment to the community that he has solved the riddle of the heat mining problem. Convenient that he shoe-horns GRC code into BBP to "sidestep" the botnet, but here's where I have a BIG issue. Code that was worked on for GRC ended up in BBP shortly thereafter.
The problem I have is that Rob was paid for both commits. Neither did he disclose this to the public and I am certain that he wouldn't offer it up without being called out for it, either. This kind of shadowy work cannot be done on a project with so many churches blindly getting onboard. There will be more reveals coming by the way. I'm speaking to churches that Rob went to who declined his offer. He's also out there attempting to "consult" churches in getting BBP mining going. Not going to knock a guy for trying to put food on the table but this kind of double & triple dipping seems WAY out of hand. The GRC connection is only the beginning.
Now I'm thinking - isn't it strange that after all this time Rob still hasn't disclosed his previous work, or his identity? One thing he probably doesn't realize is that people would treat him much better if he had a face! It's easy for people to be insensitive when they are talking to a faceless forum user, but if he showed his face, he would have much more respect automatically. It's basic psychology.