Topic: BiblePay - New Coin Launch - Official Thread - page 42. (Read 119854 times)
I have been mining on a 2600k i7 it is not so profitable but it is better then nothing since the pc stays on. I am glad to support the network though I really hope the price goes up it deserves better rewards and is rare much to rare to be at the current cost. Anyway nice coin been mining 24/7.
How can I compile the biblepay src in a fast computer in Ubuntu and copy the compiled program to a slow computer and run? Which compile option should I use? Right now, I copied the compiled program and it says a lot of libraries are missing.
You should be able to run the executable on the slower machine (provided you didn't turn on any compile-time optimisations that are not compatible with that slower machine), however the executable does rely on a number of libraries. At a guess:
libdb4.8-dev libdb4.8++-dev
(or the self-compiled DB4 option)
libboost-all-dev libssl-dev libevent-dev
libqt5gui5 libqt5core5a libqt5dbus5 qttools5-dev qttools5-dev-tools libprotobuf-dev
(but only if you compiled with the GUI enabled).
Do you run win or linux?
Did you compile with the "-march=native" flag?
No, do I need to do that? I just followed the instructions on reddit, which looking back, might not be the best
You don't need to, but adding the -march=native flag to the compiler will turn on optimisations for the processor that you are compiling on.
Yay, 1 day and my hps2 droped from 11k to 5-6k... ofc NOTHING changed. Wallet hash still 19k.
Any idea why?
Any idea why?
account to set Default Withdrawal Address
Then account--withdraw to your wallet address
Then account--withdraw to your wallet address
Thanks, I will do that! When I go there my Default withdraw address is my username. I change that for my public key, right?
edit: Ok I did it, changed to my key and it worked perfectly.
Thanks
How can I compile the biblepay src in a fast computer in Ubuntu and copy the compiled program to a slow computer and run? Which compile option should I use? Right now, I copied the compiled program and it says a lot of libraries are missing.
account to set Default Withdrawal Address
Then account--withdraw to your wallet address
Then account--withdraw to your wallet address
Hi all quick question if I may.
I have just mined for 24 hours! My first time. On the pool website it says that I have 225 in my balance, and 191 immature. By my math that should mean I have 24 biblepay "available". Should this be showing in my software wallet on my computer? Because it just says balance 0.
Thanks
I have just mined for 24 hours! My first time. On the pool website it says that I have 225 in my balance, and 191 immature. By my math that should mean I have 24 biblepay "available". Should this be showing in my software wallet on my computer? Because it just says balance 0.
Thanks
Actually now I'm pretty convinced that the issue is either with the pool or the miner or both. Bible_pay says that every miner is mining on the same difficulty, that right there leads me to believe that the pool can't keep up with the shares submitted. Of course there is no output to see so you can't tell how many shares you are submitting that are valid or invalid. Then there are these 2 posts:
http://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=17.0
http://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=18.0
If multiple threads are hashing the same share that would explain why there is such a big difference between local and pool hashrate, and why multiple daemons work best.
http://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=17.0
http://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=18.0
If multiple threads are hashing the same share that would explain why there is such a big difference between local and pool hashrate, and why multiple daemons work best.
Do you run win or linux?
Did you compile with the "-march=native" flag?
No, do I need to do that? I just followed the instructions on reddit, which looking back, might not be the best
JCDenton and whats about that suspicious transfers ?? it looks very bad that when i sent to CCEX few bbl i, i saw in my second wallet with same wallet.dat foreign transactions
I've not seen any issues with C-Cex, I looked at your message but cannot fully determine what occurred. Did you go through the steps I suggested in PM?
JCDenton and whats about that suspicious transfers ?? it looks very bad that when i sent to CCEX few bbl i, i saw in my second wallet with same wallet.dat foreign transactions
Do you run win or linux?
Did you compile with the "-march=native" flag?
I don't want to flat out say you are wrong, but what you are saying does not match up with my experience. Just as a test I took 12 cpu VM, and ran 13 daemons with a max of 2 proc each. HPS2 was half of HPS (pretty much around 10-11k hps, and 4-6k hps2). I increased the the VM to 14 and 16 CPUS with little affect on the HPS2. Then I decided to lower the CPU count while keeping the number of daemons 13. Currently I am using 8 CPUs with these 13 daemons. The HPS has dropped down to about 7 HPS yet HPS2 is 5-6 HPS2. Essentially the lower my computing power, the better the performance. Which does not make sense at all.
Do you run win or linux?
Linux. I almost wonder if its not compiled correctly to take advantage of all of the processor features.
I don't want to flat out say you are wrong, but what you are saying does not match up with my experience. Just as a test I took 12 cpu VM, and ran 13 daemons with a max of 2 proc each. HPS2 was half of HPS (pretty much around 10-11k hps, and 4-6k hps2). I increased the the VM to 14 and 16 CPUS with little affect on the HPS2. Then I decided to lower the CPU count while keeping the number of daemons 13. Currently I am using 8 CPUs with these 13 daemons. The HPS has dropped down to about 7 HPS yet HPS2 is 5-6 HPS2. Essentially the lower my computing power, the better the performance. Which does not make sense at all.
Do you run win or linux?
@Bible_pay - you might want to correct someone about this article claiming the first Christian Cryptocurrency: https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/christ-coin-launches-first-faith-based-cryptocurrency/
and again no answers why 2core got better results in mining like my 2x 10cores/20HT Intel Xeon 2630V4
biblepay beware beware on your announces ,this forum is strong tool for our miners: if wont be miners wont be BIBLEPAY ...
we want answer why 2core is better like 10core?
biblepay beware beware on your announces ,this forum is strong tool for our miners: if wont be miners wont be BIBLEPAY ...
we want answer why 2core is better like 10core?
I know you want answer from developer but I will explain
The idea of Biblepay was to make it difficult for farm style mining operations to mint the majority of the biblepay coins. It is the algorithm itself that makes 10 cores less efficient than 2 cores, or something you would have on an old laptop. The idea is to make it so the average person with a simple cpu can have a shot at mining it fruitfully.
I think there is more than likely the issue is that the pool does not take difficulty into consideration. If you have a high hashrate it will give you higher difficulty shares yet it treats your shares no differently than lower difficulty shares. I think that is why running multiple dameons helps. You are essentially saturating your system's cpu and in the process submitting more low difficulty shares. This is just a guess though. For awhile I thought it was the pool not sending work quick enough but cpu usage seems to be stable. The question then becomes, what is the sweet spot to hash the most shares without increasing difficulty? This is all speculation though as you can't even see the miner in action. Kind of ironic that the goal is to stop farm styling mining yet there is only one pool making it difficult to solo mine.
No this is not the case (LOL, what kind of pool would that be). No the pool hands out equal difficulty work to everyone. As you solve the shares, the work is checked against biblepay to make sure your solution is not only a good hash, but matches the solution in biblepay for the original problem. Then you receive credit for the share.
If you were to ask me if we have a speed inconsistency problem, let me say this: I see absolutely no problem in the measurement of HPS or the reward in HPS2 per CPU class in the pool. What I find unusual is how windows machines can achieve an HPS2 of almost as high as linux machines, with HPS showing much lower than than linux HPS. That is it that is my only inconsistency on my mind. Everything else Im happy with, as we are promoting fair mining shares per node.
As far as the pool helping, I think the pool provides a fair avenue for mining. Without it you would be out there solo mining.
I don't want to flat out say you are wrong, but what you are saying does not match up with my experience. Just as a test I took 12 cpu VM, and ran 13 daemons with a max of 2 proc each. HPS2 was half of HPS (pretty much around 10-11k hps, and 4-6k hps2). I increased the the VM to 14 and 16 CPUS with little affect on the HPS2. Then I decided to lower the CPU count while keeping the number of daemons 13. Currently I am using 8 CPUs with these 13 daemons. The HPS has dropped down to about 7 HPS yet HPS2 is 5-6 HPS2. Essentially the lower my computing power, the better the performance. Which does not make sense at all.
bible_pay where is your answer for my question about suspicious transfer in different 2 wallets with 1 same wallet.dat
@west didnt answer me
@oliwer by me nobody knows how it work: very sad when devs didnt know how it work ROFL
i sent 5 and 10 bibles to CCEX and check: exists next another transfers ... but in main wallet is all OK
https://i.imgur.com/1234xbz.png
https://i.imgur.com/KKCKmUB.png
i mined more coins= im almost 6 years miner, but BIBLEPAIN is best confused coin,where main dev doesnt know why is 2core same strong like 10 core
hat down
it will be continue, this coin will be dead
@west didnt answer me
@oliwer by me nobody knows how it work: very sad when devs didnt know how it work ROFL
i sent 5 and 10 bibles to CCEX and check: exists next another transfers ... but in main wallet is all OK
https://i.imgur.com/1234xbz.png
https://i.imgur.com/KKCKmUB.png
i mined more coins= im almost 6 years miner, but BIBLEPAIN is best confused coin,where main dev doesnt know why is 2core same strong like 10 core
hat downit will be continue, this coin will be dead
and again no answers why 2core got better results in mining like my 2x 10cores/20HT Intel Xeon 2630V4
biblepay beware beware on your announces ,this forum is strong tool for our miners: if wont be miners wont be BIBLEPAY ...
we want answer why 2core is better like 10core?
biblepay beware beware on your announces ,this forum is strong tool for our miners: if wont be miners wont be BIBLEPAY ...
we want answer why 2core is better like 10core?
I know you want answer from developer but I will explain
The idea of Biblepay was to make it difficult for farm style mining operations to mint the majority of the biblepay coins. It is the algorithm itself that makes 10 cores less efficient than 2 cores, or something you would have on an old laptop. The idea is to make it so the average person with a simple cpu can have a shot at mining it fruitfully.
I think there is more than likely the issue is that the pool does not take difficulty into consideration. If you have a high hashrate it will give you higher difficulty shares yet it treats your shares no differently than lower difficulty shares. I think that is why running multiple dameons helps. You are essentially saturating your system's cpu and in the process submitting more low difficulty shares. This is just a guess though. For awhile I thought it was the pool not sending work quick enough but cpu usage seems to be stable. The question then becomes, what is the sweet spot to hash the most shares without increasing difficulty? This is all speculation though as you can't even see the miner in action. Kind of ironic that the goal is to stop farm styling mining yet there is only one pool making it difficult to solo mine.
No this is not the case (LOL, what kind of pool would that be). No the pool hands out equal difficulty work to everyone. As you solve the shares, the work is checked against biblepay to make sure your solution is not only a good hash, but matches the solution in biblepay for the original problem. Then you receive credit for the share.
If you were to ask me if we have a speed inconsistency problem, let me say this: I see absolutely no problem in the measurement of HPS or the reward in HPS2 per CPU class in the pool. What I find unusual is how windows machines can achieve an HPS2 of almost as high as linux machines, with HPS showing much lower than than linux HPS. That is it that is my only inconsistency on my mind. Everything else Im happy with, as we are promoting fair mining shares per node.
As far as the pool helping, I think the pool provides a fair avenue for mining. Without it you would be out there solo mining.
Like you said LOL OMFG XD
Can anyone please help me on my reddit post? Trying to install wallet/set up mining on linux
https://www.reddit.com/r/BiblePay/comments/6ummuj/how_to_mine_biblepay_on_linux/dnvxs3z/
Thanks
https://www.reddit.com/r/BiblePay/comments/6ummuj/how_to_mine_biblepay_on_linux/dnvxs3z/
Thanks
Hi znffal, I answered your questions on reddit, you are pretty much all set up for using the biblepay, you juts need to get some more insights in how to use it
Hope my answers help, we may move this discussion to reddit from now on.Jump to: