Binance Hackers Bombard Chipmixer to Launder at Least 4,836 BTC - page 5.

imstillthebest

full member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 122

Quote from: Artemis3 on August 12, 2019, 09:15:40 PM

Chipmixer should have been told in advance by Binance which addresses to flag.

They have done that . not only on chipmixer but also on other mixing service but how can the mixers know if the btc came from binance hacking ? Also , mixers are still going to accept any btc and they wont care if the coins came from illegal or not .

Many mixers have been shut down on the past and i think one of those reasons why is because of the crypto/btc laundering .

bob123

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 2481

Quote from: erikalui on August 12, 2019, 10:32:32 AM

So for few bucks you earn from your signature campaign, you are ready to personally attack members to defend your campaign so would you ready to even take the blame if they turn out to be criminals?

Personal attacks ? Where ?

The whole thinking of dirty and clean coins simply does not work. There are no 'coins'. That's the point.

And i would defend any reputable business which is being attacked by people who don't know the technical details of bitcoin and therefore making wrong accusations.

Quote from: erikalui on August 12, 2019, 10:32:32 AM

Your website (as you now talk like you own it) is involved in a criminal activity so don't defend it blindly. What I do is none of your concern as I don't support criminals nor will go to the extent you went. You want to launder money, you do it but when you get caught, you can't blame the Government because you want to PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY.

No, i do not own that business.

So, in your eyes.. everyone who cares about his privacy is a criminal ? That's some weird logic.

Quote from: erikalui on August 12, 2019, 10:32:32 AM

I thought you were a decent member to talk to but sorry to say you can't even talk properly.

I am able to argue properly.
All i see in this section of the forum is some heavy misunderstanding on how bitcoin works. And this leads to wrong conclusions.
Whether it is how BTC technically works or how everyone caring about his privacy is a criminal. That's just plain stupid.

Quote from: bitbunnny on August 12, 2019, 01:54:27 PM

Earlier it was said here that there are some efforts to increase the anonimity of Bitcoin. But I'm not sure it's possible.
At the begininig we had bigger anonimity and that didn't last. With high pressure for regulation I don't think that turning back at the starting point is actually possible. And wouldn't be very good for reputation of Bitcoin either.

That's definitely possible.
Bitcoin never had any anonymity. Bitcoin was (and is) pseudonymous.

But with future improvements, BTC can definitely be a more private coin. I am not talking about full anonymity, but about enough anonymity to not get spied on by your neighbor or the store next block.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Silly argument, most money even in fiat is not physical and there can be dirty money that has never left anything but a representation in accounts, this is not something new to the crypto world and not something we should think will require its own unique answer, this has already happened.

My point is still valid.
It is simply not possible to distinguish between clean and dirty 'coins' (coins do not exist in BTC) after mixing.

Instead of simply stating 'silly argument', what about explaining how you would distinguish between them in the example i gave earlier ?

figmentofmyass

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1483

Quote from: TryNinja on August 12, 2019, 10:53:52 PM

If anything, this just shows how ChipMixer is legit. If they got almost 5k BTC in deposits and didn't run away with the money, then we can easily say they have good intentions.

i'm not worried in the least about that. the issue at hand seems more about fungibility. if someone flooded chipmixer with the binance hack outputs, it stands to reason that those outputs are being recirculated to other chipmixer users. where does that leave them, with ciphertrace at al watching every move?

tbh i don't care from an ethical standpoint---i take the position that if you can't protect your coins, they deserve to be stolen. mix them, spend them in good health.....i don't care. i just think people are understandably concerned that they're gonna be clocked by third party services for spending coins associated with that event. (yes i know they are entirely different outputs now, just not sure how blockchain analysis companies are viewing this and therefore how exchanges are reacting to related user deposits)

i'll be avoiding KYC services with chipmixer derived funds, at least for now.

stompix

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 6403

Blackjack.fun

Quote from: erikalui on August 12, 2019, 10:32:32 AM

So for few bucks you earn from your signature campaign, you are ready to personally attack members to defend your campaign so would you ready to even take the blame if they turn out to be criminals?

Your website (as you now talk like you own it) is involved in a criminal activity so don't defend it blindly. What I do is none of your concern as I don't support criminals nor will go to the extent you went. You want to launder money, you do it but when you get caught, you can't blame the Government because you want to PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY.

I thought you were a decent member to talk to but sorry to say you can't even talk properly.

So, an unknown firm claims some coins went to chipmixer with zero real proof and you claim that the website is involved in criminal activity ?
And we should shut down the mixers for this...

Well, I have some bad news from you., we should shut down the entire system because the ones that hacked binance claim something else:

Quote from: TryNinja on August 12, 2019, 10:53:52 PM

What the heck are these posts?

Well, some people think that we should have kyc on the forum, kyc when you buy coins, kyc when you use the toilet...
So, there you have it!

TryNinja

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 6830

What the heck are these posts? ChipMixer is obviously NOT going to cooperate and it's not like the government can "wake up" next day and say "yo, let's shutdown this mixer" that easily. Bestmixer was clearly acting over-confident with all their "best mixing algo" bullshit and "exchange/mining only funds" (and charging a lot of money in fees for that). They were a lot of marketed words and no real security/privacy. Their case has nothing to do with ChipMixer.

If anything, this just shows how ChipMixer is legit. If they got almost 5k BTC in deposits and didn't run away with the money, then we can easily say they have good intentions.

btc_angela

hero member

Activity: 2660

Merit: 551

Quote from: Artemis3 on August 12, 2019, 09:15:40 PM

Quote from: serjent05 on August 11, 2019, 06:30:13 AM

This is bad for Chipmixer. If the authority decided to investigate on this and targeted Chipmixer to shutdown regardless of the investigation, they can easily do it since they have a proof in their hand that a mixing service had been used to launder a hacked BTC. I wonder why Chipmixer did not suspend those transactions.., Did they failed to track that those BTC were hacked?

Chipmixer should have been told in advance by Binance which addresses to flag. But there is no system in place to do that... If they knew they could simply have kept the coins hostage. And after verification return them to the right owner minus a fee for having helped.

No authorities, that will never be universally accepted. Only a community based opt in solution will.

So the burden is not on Chipmixer, they are services and will accept everything that comes to their tumbler. It's more complicated than taking the coins hostage and sending it back to the right owner. I think Chipmixer will be cooperating, however, what can they give to authorities if there are no historical data on their back-end?

pooya87

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 10611

Quote from: Artemis3 on August 12, 2019, 09:15:40 PM

Quote from: serjent05 on August 11, 2019, 06:30:13 AM

This is bad for Chipmixer. If the authority decided to investigate on this and targeted Chipmixer to shutdown regardless of the investigation, they can easily do it since they have a proof in their hand that a mixing service had been used to launder a hacked BTC. I wonder why Chipmixer did not suspend those transactions.., Did they failed to track that those BTC were hacked?

Chipmixer should have been told in advance by Binance which addresses to flag. But there is no system in place to do that... If they knew they could simply have kept the coins hostage. And after verification return them to the right owner minus a fee for having helped.

No authorities, that will never be universally accepted. Only a community based opt in solution will.

the day mixing services start taking coins (sent to their service for mixing) hostage is the day their business dies. it should not matter where the coins come from, even if it seems against morality. because there would be no stop to that, anyone else could then report any bitcoin they sent to others as being "stolen" and demand they be frozen (assuming the other party is going to use a mixer, like in a case of a face to face purchase where the buyer runs them through a mixer to increase his anonymity).

meanwords

full member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 163

Quote from: hatshepsut93 on August 11, 2019, 08:40:04 AM

Quote from: serjent05 on August 11, 2019, 08:17:30 AM

Indeed, for sure Chipmixer will cooperate to the authority to trace the hacker. I believe Chipmixer will protect their name and will have a wise decision regarding this incident. Mixing service have records of their transaction though they keep it private.

Chipmixer is in a bad spot right now, if they give the data to authorities, they will lose some customers, both criminals and just people who don't trust governments. If they don't cooperate, they will risk getting closed, and they will have reputation of a service that launders dirty money, and some users might be scared that the coins that they get will be tainted.

I don't think it will happen. They really need to cooperate with the authority this time or they're fucked. This case involves hacking of a large exchange with a large amount of money, this is not a joke. It's more riskier to get shutdown than to cooperate with the authority. At least this way, they are doing the right thing. I think they will do this in a private matter.

Artemis3

legendary

Activity: 2030

Merit: 1569

CLEAN non GPL infringing code made in Rust lang

Quote from: serjent05 on August 11, 2019, 06:30:13 AM

This is bad for Chipmixer. If the authority decided to investigate on this and targeted Chipmixer to shutdown regardless of the investigation, they can easily do it since they have a proof in their hand that a mixing service had been used to launder a hacked BTC. I wonder why Chipmixer did not suspend those transactions.., Did they failed to track that those BTC were hacked?

Chipmixer should have been told in advance by Binance which addresses to flag. But there is no system in place to do that... If they knew they could simply have kept the coins hostage. And after verification return them to the right owner minus a fee for having helped.

No authorities, that will never be universally accepted. Only a community based opt in solution will.

jseverson

hero member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 759

Quote from: erikalui on August 12, 2019, 01:41:40 PM

^^I find Clain's allegations pretty valid and even though it's not proved, this would be investigated. A mixer was most probably the best option for the hacker and if by any chance Chipmixer was infact involved, I don't see how can they not be blamed when the same happened with Bitmixer.

Quote

Bestmixer launched in May 2018. Only a month later, police began investigating the mixing service and found that over the course of one year, the "world's leading cryptocurrency mixing service" had managed to launder at least $200 million in cryptocurrency on behalf of customers.

The cryptocurrency processed through Bestmixer was considered potentially "tainted" -- in other words, connected to illegal activities and theft.

"Mixing Bitcoins that are obtained legally is not a crime but, other than the mathematical exercise, there no real benefit to it," Fokker said. "The legality changes when a mixing service advertises itself as a success[ful] method to avoid various anti-money laundering policies via anonymity. This is actively offering a money laundering service."

https://www.zdnet.com/article/bestmixer-seized-by-eu-police-over-laundering-of-200-million-in-cryptocurrency/

Bolded the part that highlights the difference between Bestmixer and Chipmixer. I'm very interested as to what will come out of this, but if past precedent were to be followed, authorities won't have grounds to shut down Chipmixer regardless of their capability to do so.

Quote from: bryant.coleman on August 12, 2019, 08:25:44 PM

I hope that is the case with Chipmixer and the feds may not have enough power to close them down. But one thing is sure. The FBI is going to demand user logs from the Chipmixer team. I don't know how the owners will respond to that.

If everything is as it should be, they would respond by saying they don't have the logs. When a mixing session ends, all data associated with it is deleted.

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1217

Quote from: squatter on August 12, 2019, 02:33:09 AM

Quote from: bryant.coleman on August 11, 2019, 09:51:31 PM

I don't think that they have any real choice here. If the feds are involved, then they need to cooperate with them. Else, they will just get destroyed, like BTC-e and numerous other cryptocurrency ventures.

If Chipmixer is set up properly, the most the US government can do is seize their clearnet domain. Even if they can get their hands on servers, proper encryption should leave all funds intact. The service could be restarted within a few days in that case.

When fiat money isn't involved, the US government isn't that great of a threat.

I hope that is the case with Chipmixer and the feds may not have enough power to close them down. But one thing is sure. The FBI is going to demand user logs from the Chipmixer team. I don't know how the owners will respond to that. If the incoming/outgoing BTC addresses are given to the FBI, then it makes much easier for the feds to trace anyone who had used Chipmixer services earlier (Since the "clean" coins in most cases would be going to KYC enabled exchanges where it is traded for fiat).

I agree that fiat currency is not involved and therefore the threat level is low. But in case of BTC-e, almost 45% of their crypto funds were also seized by the feds. They have the capability to seize wallets and steal the coins within them. My guess is that if the authorities can prove that Chipmixer is regularly used by criminals to launder their money, then they will be able to create issues for the team, even if they may not be able to close down it completely.

1Referee

legendary

Activity: 2170

Merit: 1427

Quote from: philipma1957 on August 11, 2019, 05:46:23 PM

What will happen is mixers will be considered tainted coins by many different governments.

So it would be very wise to not send a coin into their accounts.

I do wonder though, how can you be sure as government that coins are related to a mixer?

But even if governments at one point in the future can 'taintmark' your mixed coins, what if mixers will end up offering a service where you deposit Bitcoin on-chain, but are paid out in Bitcoin on the Lightning Network? How will they taint the satoshis moving off-chain? It's practically impossible. Governments won't be able to figure out what Lightning node related to the mixer paid you out with a widely enough deployed network.

You only get to figure out coin movements when people cash out to the main chain, which there is little incentive for with more and more places to spend your coins at. It takes less than a minute to install a third party Lightning wallet and to accept payments. Perfect to conduct a transaction and then be done with it.

dimastegar

sr. member

Activity: 798

Merit: 251

Small Trader

Of course that's bad news for chipmixers. The best crypto mixing platform in my opinion. Whose name is tarnished because of a greedy hacker. They wash Bitcoin for their stomachs. But unfortunately anonymity limits the authorities to find out who exactly the hacker is.

Nolimitz84

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 252

Quote from: serjent05 on August 11, 2019, 06:30:13 AM

I wonder why Chipmixer did not suspend those transactions.., Did they failed to track that those BTC were hacked?

Apparently yes. Well, and in general, why should the service do this?After all, they do not need to worry about stolen bitcoins.It's not their concern is to find out the origin of bitcoins that were transferred to the mixer.

bitbunnny

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1068

WOLF.BET - Provably Fair Crypto Casino

Earlier it was said here that there are some efforts to increase the anonimity of Bitcoin. But I'm not sure it's possible.
At the begininig we had bigger anonimity and that didn't last. With high pressure for regulation I don't think that turning back at the starting point is actually possible. And wouldn't be very good for reputation of Bitcoin either.

bitbunnny

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1068

WOLF.BET - Provably Fair Crypto Casino

Quote from: bob123 on August 12, 2019, 08:31:39 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Those who are overly cautious need to have the crypto they spend for goods and services in a coin like monero then and just keep their investments in Bitcoin. Bitcoin is not a privacy based coin and trying to force it relies upon a lot of trust which goes against the system.

Not necessarily. There are proposals to increase the anonymity of bitcoin.

While coinjoin is fine, there are better solutions available, such as payjoin.

And how could anonimity of Bitcoin really be increased? At the begininig we had bigger anonimity and that didn't last. With high pressure for regulation I don't think that turning back at the starting point is actually possible. And wouldn't be very good for reputation of Bitcoin either.

Quote from: malevolent on August 12, 2019, 07:42:09 AM

If you follow where the outputs are being spent, and if the hackers aren't smart enough about how they sell or spend the bitcoins, or if too many of Chipmixers' users spend the mixed coins through services with KYC (or by buying physical products or services in their name), then eventually it might be possible to state with increasing likelihood which outputs are clean and which have a higher probability of being dirty.

Not really.

By combining 2 'dirty' and 'clean' outputs, creating 4 new outputs, it is not possible to call any one of them 'clean' or 'dirty' anymore.
The whole concept of 'dirty' coins simply does not work. Coins do not exist. Only UTXO do. And UTXOs are being 'destroyed' in each transaction.

erikalui

legendary

Activity: 2632

Merit: 1094

^^I find Clain's allegations pretty valid and even though it's not proved, this would be investigated. A mixer was most probably the best option for the hacker and if by any chance Chipmixer was infact involved, I don't see how can they not be blamed when the same happened with Bitmixer.

Quote

Bestmixer launched in May 2018. Only a month later, police began investigating the mixing service and found that over the course of one year, the "world's leading cryptocurrency mixing service" had managed to launder at least $200 million in cryptocurrency on behalf of customers.

The cryptocurrency processed through Bestmixer was considered potentially "tainted" -- in other words, connected to illegal activities and theft.

"Mixing Bitcoins that are obtained legally is not a crime but, other than the mathematical exercise, there no real benefit to it," Fokker said. "The legality changes when a mixing service advertises itself as a success[ful] method to avoid various anti-money laundering policies via anonymity. This is actively offering a money laundering service."

https://www.zdnet.com/article/bestmixer-seized-by-eu-police-over-laundering-of-200-million-in-cryptocurrency/

Kakmakr

legendary

Activity: 3542

Merit: 1965

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: serjent05 on August 11, 2019, 08:17:30 AM

Quote from: Kakmakr on August 11, 2019, 07:05:06 AM

This is a very stupid move and it might lead to the hacker being caught a lot quicker. A mixer service takes your coins and mix them with other people's coins, but the larger the amount of coins being mixed, the higher the chances that those coins might be mixed by the coins being send. It is rumoured that mixing services are less anonymous with larger amount of coins being mixed. Roll Eyes

Indeed, for sure Chipmixer will cooperate to the authority to trace the hacker. I believe Chipmixer will protect their name and will have a wise decision regarding this incident. Mixing service have records of their transaction though they keep it private.

Quote from: Kakmakr on August 11, 2019, 07:05:06 AM

So let's hope this backfires on them and that they dug their own grave by doing this. Tongue

The companies tracking these coins, might just have received a jackpot from these hackers bombarding a single mixer service with a lot of coins. Grin

It will definitely backfire to the hackers.

They will never cooperate with the authorities, because no logs are kept, so even if they subpoena them for the information... then they still cannot give any information to them, that they do not have. Grin

As one of the previous posters also said, the main reason why people still use mixer services, is the fact that they are not sharing information with the authorities. If they do that only once, people would stop using it and there are no way to hide that, because that would be used as evidence in a court. Wink

Slow death

legendary

Activity: 3164

Merit: 1127

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: erikalui on August 12, 2019, 12:48:33 PM

I also want to see what Chipmixer does now and see them helping in the investigation. Since there is an allegation of such a huge amount involved, they should be cooperating while the members here are deviating the topic and personally attacking members to defend Chipmixer. Hope that Chipmixer replies soon.

Quote from: https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-hackers-bombard-chipmixer-to-launder-at-least-4-836-btc

Following a major Binance’s security breach that resulted in a loss of 7,000 BTC (more than $80 million at press time), hackers started to launder the stolen funds on June 12, 2019, according to research published by Luxembourg-based crypto capital flow firm Clain.

Source: https://messari.io/organization/clain

It is a private company that has nothing to do with governments, you are looking at everything very wrong.

There is no obligation for a mixer to investigate where the funds come from and it is not the fault of a mixer if someone misuses the mixer

Topic: Binance Hackers Bombard Chipmixer to Launder at Least 4,836 BTC - page 5. (Read 6425 times)