Pages:
Author

Topic: [BIT-X.com] [CoinsBank.com] Earn Bitcoins by Posting | Signature Campaign - page 52. (Read 554235 times)

legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
!!! RiSe aBovE ThE StoRm !!!
Marcotheminer, do not makke this a fixed rate. I will tell you why:
People will spam to get the minium required posts. If there is pay per post people wouldn't spam in order to actuallly get any type of payment.

In my opinion, pay per post campaign will get more spammers than fixed campaign. But if your main idea is just to avoid spammers, it is simple thing to do. Just kick them out or give requirements to avoid spammers, maybe something like "no one day posting".

But that's already the beauty of this campaign as this campaign doesn't have any users doing "one day posting" and those who are doing are members who don't get time and who are asking for monthly fixed rates...

But, instead of going for fixed, I would still prefer pay per post, as one may still get paid based on their capacity and not for free...
Let's suppose if Bit-X asks for 200 posts a month for a BTC0.4 payout to Hero+ members, don't you think they will be getting BTC0.002 which will be much more for doing nothing???
I know that Bit-X is already having a good reputation now and they don't need such type of advertising anymore, but I guess we are all here for earning on our quality posts and I don't have any shame on saying that...
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1312
SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM
Marcotheminer, do not makke this a fixed rate. I will tell you why:
People will spam to get the minium required posts. If there is pay per post people wouldn't spam in order to actuallly get any type of payment.

In my opinion, pay per post campaign will get more spammers than fixed campaign. But if your main idea is just to avoid spammers, it is simple thing to do. Just kick them out or give requirements to avoid spammers, maybe something like "no one day posting".
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
According to me, what is going on is absolutely fine...
Because, some people here make many posts whereas some doesn't, so paying them for those posts at a fixed rate would be a loss instead of what they are already paying, i.e.; pay per post rates...

Weekly and pay per post is better because this is why many are here, including me...

I live on BTC, so definitely not an option for me to go for fixed...

I think everything will be fine and people will be ok after payments are not delayed.  How many people currently have a past date on next payment time? (1-20 for me)
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
!!! RiSe aBovE ThE StoRm !!!
According to me, what is going on is absolutely fine...
Because, some people here make many posts whereas some doesn't, so paying them for those posts at a fixed rate would be a loss instead of what they are already paying, i.e.; pay per post rates...

Weekly and pay per post is better because this is why many are here, including me...

I live on BTC, so definitely not an option for me to go for fixed...
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
I see some suggests a weekly payment and some monthly. how about biweekly? (edit: I see blazed already suggested this.)

I don't mind if you switch to a fixed rate. though you'd have a trouble of choosing the right amount of post required. too low or too high and you'll probably see people quitting.

I say keep weekly it is honestly the best way.  Once delays are dealt with it will be good again.   But weekly payment is a bonus compared to bi-weekly and monthly.

Is most everyone stuck with past date on payment? I think that is the issue.
copper member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1007
hee-ho.
I see some suggests a weekly payment and some monthly. how about biweekly? (edit: I see blazed already suggested this.)

I don't mind if you switch to a fixed rate. though you'd have a trouble of choosing the right amount of post required. too low or too high and you'll probably see people quitting.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1005
PGP ID: 78B7B84D
For a fixed rate, I would go monthly. I get busier during weeks of certain months, but overall I'm sure I'll hit the minimum. If it's weekly, I'll miss out on some weeks and overpost for other months.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
The reason I suggested a monthly payment over the weekly was for Marco to keep up easier. I never understood the point of a weekly payment since it is not very much coins wise. I just assumed most people like myself found 1 decent payment more useful. Whatever works best for everyone I suppose! I do agree the quality of posters in this campaign is the best it has ever been currently. Maybe a bi-weekly payment would be the best for the users and Marco?

legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1654
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI
I was the member of this awesome campaign for approximately 6 month. I enjoyed this campaign. But due to shortage of Time, I couldnt make the much posts, So I shift to some Fixed rate campaign Like paying .05BTC for 20- 25 Posts a Week. I think Fixed rate combination is best, if the campaign is Old enough.

What you Say A campaign that is Running from more than 7-8 Month need extensive Exposure? NO, Now you need few Best Poster.Who can Make posts in Beginners and Few other Section, for Just newbies, who dont know about this site. Else i think everyone Knows about BIT-x.

Regards
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
English <-> Portuguese translations
Sure, let's open it to discussion: What do people think of making this campaign a fixed rate/monthly type campaign with competitive rates (of course)?

I don't like it TBH
I feel very comfortable posting in my free time, I mean, sometimes I may post a lot in a week, other times I'll post only a few, and even if I post a lot, almost half of my posts doesn't count, since I post a lot in my local language section and sometimes in the off-topic section.
I don't like being forced to post, I want to post only when I feel that I need to.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
I don't mind having a fixed rate but it should be a weekly payout. Also, I would not be comfortable with minimum posts as sometimes I may not be able to reach the minimum count. There can be a max limit though.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
there is one problem with fixed rate, many will just do alt and spam their 50 minimum post to get more earning than now, so you must check carefully who is partecipating if you're going to use this way

with unlimited at least you're sure that there are no alt on the same campaign, because it would be pointless
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1017
Sure, let's open it to discussion: What do people think of making this campaign a fixed rate/monthly type campaign with competitive rates (of course)?

it depend on the fixed rate, i like unlimited rate to be honest, because i've plenty of free time, right now i'm not even posting for the campaign but for another thing lol
I agree with you on this, I will have many free time to quality post in the coming weeks.
Please bring unlimited back, no spam will get involved, I am sure.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
DMD Diamond Making Money 4+ years! Join us!
If the rule would be 0.07 per week for 80+ posts, or close to that, I d be happy with this deal. However, one way or another, I d really to see this campaign start respecting its payout times and dates.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
Sure, let's open it to discussion: What do people think of making this campaign a fixed rate/monthly type campaign with competitive rates (of course)?

it depend on the fixed rate, i like unlimited rate to be honest, because i've plenty of free time, right now i'm not even posting for the campaign but for another thing lol
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000

If they will consider a fixed rate, it should be weekly and not monthly. Or just leave it what it is today and besides the rates are modify and now have a post limit unlike before.

Im proud to say that all bit x participants (at least I haven't see one) are not spammer so I don't see any sense why inserting the spam thing here.

Anyways after all the discussions here, how's the payment status now? lol.


I think once we get it all back up and running there will be less asking for change.  I think current is fine it's just the delay's that have people asking change.  As I have said I am happy with how it is, if everyone wanted fixed I don't have issue just hope the 100 limit is what it's based on.  I am someone who pretty much always has more then limit as I love bitcoin and spend way to much time on this site.

But on payments it looks like bot is funded.  But most of campaign is stuck on 1-20 (past date) from what I see though blockchain payments. Hopefully it will be fixed soon then everyone will be happy.  

I think the change question is being caused by these delay's.  Once were back on track with weekly pay all I think will be happy again.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1398
For support ➡️ help.bc.game

If they will consider a fixed rate, it should be weekly and not monthly. Or just leave it what it is today and besides the rates are modify and now have a post limit unlike before.

Im proud to say that all bit x participants (at least I haven't see one) are not spammer so I don't see any sense why inserting the spam thing here.

Anyways after all the discussions here, how's the payment status now? lol.



legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
I don't mind flat rate payments, as long as they're competitive, obviously, like marcotheminer said.

Simple... numbers are hypothetical

Flat Rate for Legendary = minimum 50 posts per month for.3BTC
Flat Rate for Seniors = minimum 50 posts per month for.2BTC
Flat Rate for Full Member = minimum 50 posts per month for.1BTC

etc...

The same as any normal flat rate campaign.

Something like this would be fine with me and it would probably be useful to make blatant spammers go away (although I haven't been seeing spammers with bit-x sigs lately). But I do think there would be issues with folks that make a lot of posts, and in which pretty much every one of them is valid/useful/good or positive in some way (unless they can, somehow, get a bigger flat rate).
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
I like weekly pay out.  As far as fixed or not I'm not to worried.  I focus on good post's and not amount.   I would hope the fixed keeps the 100 post payment in mind.  If it paid for 100 posts I am happy.   And that is from someone who normally is on a lot and has far more then 100.

I think fixed weekly would be best if we go to fixed.  Which I think most would be ok with fixed.   Only problem I see is you need to do fixed with X amount of posts per week or something.  If you don't there are some inactive that would make the fixed and have a few posts.

I also don't have a problem with weekly payments based on number of posts with a limit like we have now.  The limit stops spam, so I do see a reason for limit.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
I'm no longer part of the campaign but I would like to say : a fixed/flat rate (not based on the number of made posts) is more appropriate in this case and it will reduce the spam.
Pages:
Jump to: