Topic: == Bitcoin challenge transaction: ~1000 BTC total bounty to solvers! ==UPDATED== - page 2. (Read 53701 times)

If a pool is properly developed this should never be a problem, the users will no have way to use the server as oracle, and the users can't lie about what they scan or what they don't scan.

ttdsales /66bit/ ??

ttdsales/67bit It's open, let's become a member now.

a community of people who waste their time and hardware.

Because the system is a closed circuit system, no one can prove anything. You find the money, but my server informs me. You can't see the background.


-----------------------------------------------------
Zielar, one of the people closest to Chris (TTD), also made a statement along these lines. I wonder what happened between them?

Zielar, who put a lot of effort into the system at first, now doesn't like the system?
I hope this will answer the question and other users will understand that it is not a correct system.

---

One of the system ideas is,

I scan a few ranges, the other person scans the range at the same level and we share information with each other.
There will be many things like system vulnerabilities etc.

For example, what if he wants to get information by lying about the range he did not scan?
User, IP, MAC address. BAN!!

How puzzles could have been generated:

what is TTD?

I completely agree with ziealer on this. He may be right about finding TTD in 64 and 66 wallets.

Zielar, who has had TTD before, I don't know what problem he has with Chris Zahrt.

I don't trust places like this from the beginning. Actually, I have a different idea in mind, but everyone's opinion may be needed.

Maybe they've been cracking keys using stolen credit cards to squat as many GPU's as possible, who knows. See this blog, it's a good read: https://modal.com/blog/catching-cryptominers

Higher school of driving :-D but as one of the few I have to admit that you contribute a lot of valuable issues to the topic. I haven't been here for some time because occasionally somewhere on the side I "cooperated" with ttd with free funds. Somewhere there, at the beginning at pool 64 I had concerns as to whether the creation of this pool was really for the purpose of "mutual benefit", but later I dispelled my concerns due to good contact with the owner. It became distasteful when, convinced by the recent successes of pool 66, I was focused on part of the prize - I finally dispelled my concerns in a negative way. Once again, someone has developed a twice as difficult range with positive results - and once again no one has flaunted it either before or after finding a solution... Well, yes - the simplest. Who is going to prove anything to whom when the results of the work have always been sent to the server. All you have to do is receive the key, withdraw it and announce that someone from outside has done it, right? Besides, tell me honestly - do you think that anyone ALONE is trying to break larger and larger ranges?? since even for me level 64 already seems so high that I gave up. And here you go - the last two low-level levels (for which pools were created) - the finder of the key unknown and the pool is not the finder...? And for credibility, it was enough to create some newbie account and post with the key and it would immediately look different... besides, for a profit of a million dollars - during these two years I would be able to develop even this account well and come up with a good story about how I got to this key)... but oh well... not every person acts the same. Personally, I completely give up on this type of "cooperation" and I strongly advise against it to others.. It's a waste of your money to pump it into others. If you think otherwise - you can deposit it into my wallet without deluding yourself that you will gain anything except my gratitude:
=============
bc1qv5a3urpj3fszalsuw0r4dlafxel68aaypqxxqlzhl8ygnehw6k9s8d3sm2
============
To be honest - what pissed me off was not even that I was disappointed in my opinion, but that despite spending free funds on some contribution to a previously trusted pool - in the end it turned out that I spent $4,000 on the scale of the entire contribution, so not a small amount. I know that there are those who spent much more and I sympathize with you very much. I know that life will return it to you in a double positive form. As I promoted earlier - I currently RECOMMEND NOT cooperating with you in any projects related to this challenge, because as statistics have shown - since I found with JLP and published solutions to the found ranges - each subsequent level has been discovered by an UNKNOWN PERSON in an UNKNOWN WAY... the solution is UNKNOWN for most, and the costs and requirements are much greater. There is no point in hiding - this challenge has already become only a matrix for creating the perfect idea for how to get rich by walking over dead bodies... and with today's technology - the chances are slim... and this was probably also the idea of ​​the creator, who paid so much BTC additionally to wallets. The entered phrase with a request to send the solution to PM is the only thing I can do to be able to learn the solutions... at least for statistical purposes... because this is probably the MAX of what you can be happy about today in the subject of this challenge.

I don't know if such person/people is reading us but...

A clever way to disclose the private key is the next:

Take all the inputs to your address but leave some dust input behind (all those wallets has always some dust inputs)
Then once that you cleared all the balances in all chains except one dust, make a special TX where you manually chose a repeated Nonce value or one with some difference small to be solvable with some math.
Broadcast that TX and someone should notice that repeated or weak R value and the key should be solved easily.

You are a serious idiot. I feel sorry for you, my son.

Since 130 has been solved and the key has not been provided again, the same as 66, in which I invested quite a bit of effort, and the super honest ttd pool perfectly hid the fact that the key was found - I am completely disinterested in this crap. Higher wallets lose their meaning, because it is not known who guessed what and how much they ripped off, so it does not contribute anything at all, while lower addresses are stolen by pseudo-smart guys. Here it is no longer fun and striving to find a solution, but a fight for who will be the first and how cunningly will rob the wallet. Good luck. And I greet those wimps like COBRAS who have a lot to say about their unfucked egos.

---

I don't think we lost it, but we got screwed over. Another pool and another unknown finder of the key who didn't brag about the win personally. I think both 66 and 64 were solved by TTD.

I advise you not to get involved in anything group-based in the future that is supposed to bring financial benefits and that over the internet, because you know... they will screw you over again. They certainly won't screw me. I congratulate those who made withdrawals through trickery on their ingenuity... and I hope it works out for you and affects your families.

You apparently don't quite understand how RBF and Full-RBF work. As RBF is in the interest of miners/mining pools because it increases the transaction fee, you can safely assume that basically every miner/mining pool has Full-RBF enabled. Therefore you can't prevent RBF even when you flag your transaction as non-RBF.

Didn't you read at least past few pages? Your only chance would be to queue your transaction to be mined non-publicly, e.g. via https://slipstream.mara.com. I searched this thread and below citation is the first hit of it here (page 51 of this thread, so not too far in the past). I took the liberty to shrink the picture in the quoted snippet a bit.

Well that is a possibility? But unless you provide some evidence, all it a pure speculation.


Same, he/they can be a single person, a group of people, we DON'T KNOW.


Many Replacements can be done until almost 100% of the balance become in a Fee for the miner.

But this depends of how many time a miner takes to mine that specific block, it can be 1 second from your TX or some hours from IT, that is something that we don't control.

Dears,

Just an idea. 

What if I found wallet 69, initiated the transaction, and then replaced the transaction myself (by stealing from myself), would it work?
How many times can a transaction be "stolen" before it is mined?

I meant stolen computing resources. By the owner of 3Emiwzxme7Mrj4d89uqohXNncnRM15YESs. It's not a business...

What?? where do you get that?

Well what we expected from some new accoun t with just 8 messages?

Those aren't stolen resources, the puzzles were made with the sole purpose of being cracked the author of the puzzle state it.


What if they are a bussines that is waiting to bitcoin reach some 100K or something high per coin, just to recover investments and get some real profit?

There are wallets with more bitcoin without being moved in more than a decade, based on what you said are all those also stolen founds?
Well with exception of the 1Feex Wallet...

Since the solver hasn't said anything all that we said here is a pure speculation.

It makes you wonder what kind of person would leave it unspent for more than a year... My guess? Either someone who doesn’t need money, because anyone who’s ever wanted to buy a car or whatever, would have spent at least some of it right away. Or someone scared as s**t, since they've used stolen resources. In that case, they might think they’re being watched — and... they’re probably not wrong. Bitcoin is not untraceable since txns are on a public ledger. Even the best get trapped once they start spending...

So it's more likely this isn’t someone honest who spent all his f*****g savings to rent GPUs and prayed every night... This is someone who knows he’ll be in deep trouble the moment he starts cashing out.

Yes, that's correct. Otherwise you could just straight up solve #130 as the public key was available from the beginning.

Most bots can steal from puzzle #67 up to the 75-80ish bits, depending on the rig's capabilities.

Any key that takes less than ~10 minutes to crack is not safe. (~10m avg block time, not always the case).

I personally would only feel safe above 110 bits, just to be sure, as we cannot really know what is out there regarding other people's cracking capabilities.

Anything less then 110 bits I would send through MARA's slipstream.


You must be completely delusional if you think anyone here wants to buy a python script you got from chatGPT.

Heck, I wouldn't even bother myself to read your code, even if you were giving it away for free.

If you have balls it is simple, make a signature of the puzzles that you solve, prove your own words, in cryptography it is easy to prove that you have some keys without reveal them. Or you don't know how to do that?

STFU and go get some brains.

You guys deserve nothing i wont share anything now here. and wont sell my script to someone who comes from this forum.

As Alberto wrote above, you can sign a message with any of the puzzle keys 120, 125, 130. If you can't do this, then you're just a scammer.