Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 20. (Read 245810 times)

newbie
Activity: 68
Merit: 0
1BY8GQbnueYofwSuFAT3USAhGjPrkxDdW9
1BY8GQbnueYebq5d6CE1wDfbdAWWy33ZyW
HEX:7545bf10859946eca
WIF:KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qbRyCkJQmfJhcqQ1bT4q

Thank you very much for this information. cctv5go

Thank you for the 1BY8GQbnueY that I want to include in my own system.


Quote

lets make me clear, did you mean after your script found prefix 1BY8GQbnueY then automatically jump to the next prefix 1BY8GQbnueY?

A similar example.

1BY8GQbnueY how many do you think are in our 67 bit range?
1BY8GQbnue how many do you think are in our 67 bit range?

I found the answers to these in part.

So I confirmed these with hardware that was not too high, but my range is still far but not as far as space. Smiley

So I guess everyone learned the answer to the question I wrote before,
How many 1BY8GQbnueY starts are there in our 67 bit range? The correct answer is 4. Wink
?
Activity: -
Merit: -
1BY8GQbnueYofwSuFAT3USAhGjPrkxDdW9


1BY8GQbnueYebq5d6CE1wDfbdAWWy33ZyW
HEX:7545bf10859946eca
WIF:KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qbRyCkJQmfJhcqQ1bT4q
member
Activity: 873
Merit: 22
$$P2P BTC BRUTE.JOIN NOW ! https://uclck.me/SQPJk
If I'm going to give him 1 btc, I also want to. I live in Africa, and the price of bread here is very expensive, 1 btc can help me!

At this ATH moment of bitcoin 1 btc will be enough for a lifetime (With a well management investment and with Moderate product consumption a.k.a not living big and burn money) for anyone.

Also, when the puzzle 66 was solved, didn't somebody (not the solver) grab the money (a bot?) ?

The evidence suggest that it was snatched by someone else. but since the original solver is still unknown then we may only speculate with it.

btc will be 200k USD nex year, btc never grow for less then 100%/year.
?
Activity: -
Merit: -
Oh lord, what has become of this thread for the past few days LMAO

The drama around RetiredCoder is just over the top lol

Lol..May be the creator is also enjoying the drama just like us.


he is preparing to escape: bc1qrvyn8teh3nalcq4dlnq4plskuuvncjpku76mka
he is fed up with theatrics.
hero member
Activity: 862
Merit: 662
If I'm going to give him 1 btc, I also want to. I live in Africa, and the price of bread here is very expensive, 1 btc can help me!

At this ATH moment of bitcoin 1 btc will be enough for a lifetime (With a well management investment and with Moderate product consumption a.k.a not living big and burn money) for anyone.

Also, when the puzzle 66 was solved, didn't somebody (not the solver) grab the money (a bot?) ?

The evidence suggest that it was snatched by someone else. but since the original solver is still unknown then we may only speculate with it.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Question for everyone.



Its a dog eat dog world full of delusional people.



The guy who solved the puzzle is living in a delusion. He thinks he has the fastest version, but in reality, it's the slowest. Anyone using the slowest version with 100 - 500 GPUs will obviously become fast.
member
Activity: 239
Merit: 53
New ideas will be criticized and then admired.

No idea what "desired result" should mean to you, but his code only counts the total iterations, not the number of operations. At each iteration, there is a cycle handling loop and additional code to create new starting points and do additional jumps from base points to the new created points. These are not counted at all in his statistics of his "K" so his SOTA complexity breakthrough is incorrect so basically what I'm saying is that he suffers of so much boredom he can't see his own code bugs, instead he thinks he "invented" some new methods to break ECDLP, who cares that they are actually slower than what we already know?!

Someone who would attack ECDLP in a decent matter would use the correct notation of things, at least.

Now, I never said RetiredCoder is the creator, I just said the keys were probably solved in another way, or were already known to him, or they were solved in a much longer timespan than what he brags about, or with a lot higher costs and resources. Because some things definitely do not add up, logically.


I understand, but the truth is that Kang-1 is complex for me to grasp; I'm not sure how efficient it is. However, it is strange that someone with money would waste time solving the obvious. I say obvious because we all know that with a lot of money, you gain the necessary power to solve it. There’s nothing surprising about that. So if Elon Musk wakes up tomorrow with the whim to solve 135 and 140, he will. The real magic lies in finding a cheap algorithm capable of solving it.

Therefore, I can understand the people who criticize him because he didn’t do anything new. He took it because he could. So far, he has only demonstrated that he has money.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0

Question for everyone.



Do you have anymore questions to ask??  Grin
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Question for everyone.

If you find a effective method to complete 135 are you going to share your method/code ?
We have known for years that if you have money you have a head start in these puzzles if you bothered to read from page 70 odd if not before that.

No one here is going to hand you that.

snippets yes.

Me personally i wouldn't.
I would tip a few people in this forum for the intel posted if that's what helped me other than that why am i putting others in a million dollar race when i have a head start.Huh

Its a dog eat dog world full of delusional people.


Isn't this a super easy task, to test? Give me the same program, and I will run it with a GPU and then with a CPU, and let's see which solves the key first. Let's make it an 80 bit range. 1 GPU versus a single core, or do you want to use as many cores as the CPU has? Any bets on which one finds the key first?

80bit yes, because you can use low DP. For 120-130 and higher - you have to use high DP and you will get big overhead with JLP. And it's not easy to test 120-130bit range to confirm Smiley

Also, RetiredCoder, make mods to the program, to create less "kangs" when using a GPU, if it's to crazy for you...it's super easy to do. And another question, how does the speed of "kangs", impact the finding of High DP bits. Does a CPU (which the individual kangs are faster) find high DP bits, faster? Or does the GPU's slow, but many, find more, DP bits, faster?
And the last question, which "high puzzles" have you solved and what did you use to solve (CPU, GPU, DP, etc)

Yes I started with JLP code a long time ago, but after some time I got enough experience and I created my own software from scratch - much faster and efficient. So it's not a mod.


Why are your feelings getting hurt? Are you the puzzle solver? Because to me, it sure looks like you’re RetiredCoder. A guy who solves his own mini-puzzle for attention—what more can we expect from him? A guy who supposedly holds a world record but shares code with the public that’s slower than what is already available—what can we expect from him? A millionaire who begs for 100 merit points despite having millions of dollars—what can we expect from him?

If he doesn’t want to share the code, he should just be a man and say, 'I don’t want to share it,' instead of teasing us with 'I’ll share the GPU version in Part 3.' What are we supposed to do with his Part 1, 2, and 3 if he never actually shares his method?

People like JLP have earned respect because they openly shared code that was effective at the time and helped many developers. Meanwhile, RetiredCoder himself said he started with JLP’s code. But where’s the credit to JLP? Instead, we get empty promises and slower code. What can we expect from someone like that?

?
Activity: -
Merit: -
Question for everyone.

If you find a effective method to complete 135 are you going to share your method/code ?
We have known for years that if you have money you have a head start in these puzzles if you bothered to read from page 70 odd if not before that.

No one here is going to hand you that.

snippets yes.

Me personally i wouldn't.
I would tip a few people in this forum for the intel posted if that's what helped me other than that why am i putting others in a million dollar race when i have a head start.Huh

Its a dog eat dog world full of delusional people.
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
34Sf4DnMt3z6XKKoWmZRw2nGyfGkDgNJZZ
Hello everyone, has the person who found the puzzle 130 appeared?
member
Activity: 348
Merit: 34
I am afraid upcoming days when I will pick #135 #140
You all will think about me , a creator ?
My resources are 1 gpu GTX 460 with 1gb ram and i-3 2 core Intel CPU, 4 hdd sata 3tb 16gb ram
Half brain dead, due to paralyzed so called brainless

Who buy me a coffee

I can't afford coffee, but it's necessary more then meds for make my half brain alive
member
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
,':D PERSONAL TEXT!!
Oh lord, what has become of this thread for the past few days LMAO

The drama around RetiredCoder is just over the top lol

Lol..May be the creator is also enjoying the drama just like us.

Maybe, who knows LOL  Roll Eyes
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Oh lord, what has become of this thread for the past few days LMAO

The drama around RetiredCoder is just over the top lol

Lol..May be the creator is also enjoying the drama just like us.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
There’s a 50/50 chance that it could be the creator, but even I can’t confirm this. The reason I say so is because when puzzle #120 was solved, if RetiredCoder was the actual solver, you’d expect the creator to wait for the private keys to be revealed before funding the remaining addresses with 1000 BTC. Instead, without knowing who solved it or how it was solved, the creator immediately increased the prize to 1000 BTC.

Another suspicious point is that puzzles #66 and #130 were both solved in the same month. While this could be a coincidence, it still raises questions. The sad part is that we’ll probably never know the truth since the creator isn’t coming forward to address the criticism or clarify any of these doubts.

When somebody increased the prize to 1000 BTC? What I missed?
Also, when the puzzle 66 was solved, didn't somebody (not the solver) grab the money (a bot?) ?
member
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
,':D PERSONAL TEXT!!
Oh lord, what has become of this thread for the past few days LMAO

The drama around RetiredCoder is just over the top lol
member
Activity: 348
Merit: 34
In my view
If Retire Coder is real solver or creator or any other Q
What's in front of us, all remaining address and remaining pubkeys with their balances still exist,
We should focus our abilities and resources for win the remaining rewards
Everyone have rights to write their reviews, research, working method etc
Despite it's real or fake, just pick your interest as per your available resources, and apply in your own way
Kangaroo app by jlp zeiler, Alberto wandering, is no last hope, thankx to telariust, who first write Pollard kangaroo methode for ecdlp solver, later other developers just optimizing method apply, all others no new invented, only apply optimisation and tips n trick ,
Remember kangaroo is not last option, work in your available resources and don't loose hope , still big winning waiting for you
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
There’s a 50/50 chance that it could be the creator, but even I can’t confirm this. The reason I say so is because when puzzle #120 was solved, if RetiredCoder was the actual solver, you’d expect the creator to wait for the private keys to be revealed before funding the remaining addresses with 1000 BTC. Instead, without knowing who solved it or how it was solved, the creator immediately increased the prize to 1000 BTC.

Another suspicious point is that puzzles #66 and #130 were both solved in the same month. While this could be a coincidence, it still raises questions. The sad part is that we’ll probably never know the truth since the creator isn’t coming forward to address the criticism or clarify any of these doubts.
member
Activity: 165
Merit: 26
I have tried to implement the RetiredCoder method on CPU, but without getting the desired results, if anyone knows how, or where I'm wrong, feel free to give suggestions.
I don't fully understand it, I admit.

No idea what "desired result" should mean to you, but his code only counts the total iterations, not the number of operations. At each iteration, there is a cycle handling loop and additional code to create new starting points and do additional jumps from base points to the new created points. These are not counted at all in his statistics of his "K" so his SOTA complexity breakthrough is incorrect so basically what I'm saying is that he suffers of so much boredom he can't see his own code bugs, instead he thinks he "invented" some new methods to break ECDLP, who cares that they are actually slower than what we already know?!

Someone who would attack ECDLP in a decent matter would use the correct notation of things, at least.

Now, I never said RetiredCoder is the creator, I just said the keys were probably solved in another way, or were already known to him, or they were solved in a much longer timespan than what he brags about, or with a lot higher costs and resources. Because some things definitely do not add up, logically.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
I have gathered as much strength and determination as I could and decided to read the last 10 pages of this thread as an ultimate homage to my English teacher and her hours of reading comprehension lessons. My brain is completely toast.
Pages:
Jump to: