Hello,
is there any pool where we can combine all our gpus to bruteforce a puzzle?
is there any pool where we can combine all our gpus to bruteforce a puzzle?
hi yes we're working on a pool based with kangaroo write me on telegram @rickpwn
Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 219. (Read 229665 times)
hi yes we're working on a pool based with kangaroo write me on telegram @rickpwn
Who is awd?
Puzzle 66 is really low a LOT with its prize. Satoshi could've increased the price by 10x again so it'll be worth the time and electricity we are investing on it.
I would love to give a suggestion to Satoshi again.
I'd take all unsolved puzzle coins from 101 to 160 and add them to the unsolved parts that are under 100 bits.
I think the maximum is 100 bits we can crack without a public key, so it'll be worth the mention.
Thanks Satoshi,
Who agree? guys merit me so Satoshi can see and take actions
I'd like some virgins as topping on the cake as well! Lol. People and their expectations, I forgot to ask satoshi to pass the salt over!🤣I would love to give a suggestion to Satoshi again.
I'd take all unsolved puzzle coins from 101 to 160 and add them to the unsolved parts that are under 100 bits.
I think the maximum is 100 bits we can crack without a public key, so it'll be worth the mention.
Thanks Satoshi,
Who agree? guys merit me so Satoshi can see and take actions
These puzzles are not to solve and collect the prize, they exist so that we don't go wandering around emptying people's addresses! But seriously ever since the increase, I have stopped looking for lost wallets, but that's temporary as soon as AWD team cracks all the puzzles, we will continue our effort, which is taking names kicking ass.😂
why was the last post of "Professor of wilds" here about puzzle #66 deleted? To the poster: please write again your proposal about the key search and the list you posted
Just came back to this thread and yes the post has gone???
Puzzle 66 is really low a LOT with its prize. Satoshi could've increased the price by 10x again so it'll be worth the time and electricity we are investing on it.
I would love to give a suggestion to Satoshi again.
I'd take all unsolved puzzle coins from 101 to 160 and add them to the unsolved parts that are under 100 bits.
I think the maximum is 100 bits we can crack without a public key, so it'll be worth the mention.
Thanks Satoshi,
Who agree? guys merit me so Satoshi can see and take actions
I would love to give a suggestion to Satoshi again.
I'd take all unsolved puzzle coins from 101 to 160 and add them to the unsolved parts that are under 100 bits.
I think the maximum is 100 bits we can crack without a public key, so it'll be worth the mention.
Thanks Satoshi,
Who agree? guys merit me so Satoshi can see and take actions
why was the last post of "Professor of wilds" here about puzzle #66 deleted? To the poster: please write again your proposal about the key search and the list you posted
Dear @WanderingPhilospher please tell me what happened with stride in VanBitCracken, I have absolutely no idea how difficult this task is. But I hope that you will definitely be able to do it.
I have yet to figure it out. Therefore, I had to create my stride function with the help of python lol...python creates next stride; but this is not as fast as if it were built into the program.program, python stride, program, python stride, etc.
Hi, yes there is in development a pool for #125 puzzle. If you want to follow me, DM me.
my telegram: @rickpwn
Dear @WanderingPhilospher please tell me what happened with stride in VanBitCracken, I have absolutely no idea how difficult this task is. But I hope that you will definitely be able to do it.
I have yet to figure it out. Therefore, I had to create my stride function with the help of python lol...python creates next stride; but this is not as fast as if it were built into the program.program, python stride, program, python stride, etc.
Hi, yes there is in development a pool for #125 puzzle. If you want to follow me, DM me.
Dear @WanderingPhilospher please tell me what happened with stride in VanBitCracken, I have absolutely no idea how difficult this task is. But I hope that you will definitely be able to do it.
I have yet to figure it out. Therefore, I had to create my stride function with the help of python lol...python creates next stride; but this is not as fast as if it were built into the program.program, python stride, program, python stride, etc.
Hi, yes there is in development a pool for #125 puzzle. If you want to follow me, DM me.
Dear @WanderingPhilospher please tell me what happened with stride in VanBitCracken, I have absolutely no idea how difficult this task is. But I hope that you will definitely be able to do it.
I have yet to figure it out. Therefore, I had to create my stride function with the help of python lol...python creates next stride; but this is not as fast as if it were built into the program.program, python stride, program, python stride, etc.
Dear @WanderingPhilospher please tell me what happened with stride in VanBitCracken, I have absolutely no idea how difficult this task is. But I hope that you will definitely be able to do it.
I have yet to figure it out. Therefore, I had to create my stride function with the help of python lol...python creates next stride; but this is not as fast as if it were built into the program.program, python stride, program, python stride, etc.
How is it possible to achieve this through Python? Since VanBitCracken always starts counting from 1, so it is impossible to have a jump like stride. Could you provide me with an example, how to accomplish this using Python? Even if there is a difference in speed, the stride function should work.
Are you talking about VBCRandom.exe ?
Dear @WanderingPhilospher please tell me what happened with stride in VanBitCracken, I have absolutely no idea how difficult this task is. But I hope that you will definitely be able to do it.
I have yet to figure it out. Therefore, I had to create my stride function with the help of python lol...python creates next stride; but this is not as fast as if it were built into the program.program, python stride, program, python stride, etc.
How is it possible to achieve this through Python? Since VanBitCracken always starts counting from 1, so it is impossible to have a jump like stride. Could you provide me with an example, how to accomplish this using Python? Even if there is a difference in speed, the stride function should work.
Dear @WanderingPhilospher please tell me what happened with stride in VanBitCracken, I have absolutely no idea how difficult this task is. But I hope that you will definitely be able to do it.
I have yet to figure it out. Therefore, I had to create my stride function with the help of python lol...python creates next stride; but this is not as fast as if it were built into the program.program, python stride, program, python stride, etc.
Dear @WanderingPhilospher please tell me what happened with stride in VanBitCracken, I have absolutely no idea how difficult this task is. But I hope that you will definitely be able to do it.
HYPOTHETICALLY if i had a solid bot net with 22k bots none copied. could someone implement their kangaroo script or edcsa script into it to maximize out put with a single computer.
Please define a "bot"; computers, CPU only, GPUs, or something else?Yes, you can run Kangaroo on a server and have all your bots connect to it.
Most of these so-called "dead computers" don't even have NVIDIA GPUs so this would be a futile endeavor, as CPUs are just too slow to replicate a GPU, as well as highly illegal as it's using a botnet.
You'd only have a chance when using one of the big botnets, and even those are very expensive to rent out. And in the case of Kangaroo, it is literally gambling.
CPUs are actually much faster than a GPU, the only downside is that CPUs do not put a whole lot of kangaroos in the range; default is 1024 kangaroos per CPU core, so if you run 4 cores, then that is only 4096 kangaroos running the range. But each individual kangaroo is performing running at least 7,000 calculations per second. Whereas a GPU, you are lucky to get 1,000-1,500 calculations per second, but you have many more kangaroos in the range.
With 22k CPUs, I estimate 240 days to solve #125. Add in a few GPUs, it increases the chance of solving much sooner.
What is the chances of solving puzzle #125 using only Kangaroo by fully running only one 2080 TI 24/7 for one month?
approximately 0.000000000012% / you are about 100 times more likely to win the lotterybut without playing it is not certain not to win
What is the chances of solving puzzle #125 using only Kangaroo by fully running only one 2080 TI 24/7 for one month?
HYPOTHETICALLY if i had a solid bot net with 22k bots none copied. could someone implement their kangaroo script or edcsa script into it to maximize out put with a single computer.
Please define a "bot"; computers, CPU only, GPUs, or something else?Yes, you can run Kangaroo on a server and have all your bots connect to it.
Most of these so-called "dead computers" don't even have NVIDIA GPUs so this would be a futile endeavor, as CPUs are just too slow to replicate a GPU, as well as highly illegal as it's using a botnet.
You'd only have a chance when using one of the big botnets, and even those are very expensive to rent out. And in the case of Kangaroo, it is literally gambling.
HYPOTHETICALLY if i had a solid bot net with 22k bots none copied. could someone implement their kangaroo script or edcsa script into it to maximize out put with a single computer.
Please define a "bot"; computers, CPU only, GPUs, or something else?Yes, you can run Kangaroo on a server and have all your bots connect to it.
HYPOTHETICALLY if i had a solid bot net with 22k bots none copied. could someone implement their kangaroo script or edcsa script into it to maximize out put with a single computer.
Please define a "bot"; computers, CPU only, GPUs, or something else?Yes, you can run Kangaroo on a server and have all your bots connect to it.
Jump to: