Alberto has nothing to hide. His work and contributions are fully open-source, and anyone can freely inspect the code, methods, and results. This transparency is a fundamental part of his approach, allowing anyone interested to understand, critique, and even improve upon his work.
His dedication to transparency, even in the face of frequent criticism, speaks volumes about his integrity. It’s not about hiding something but about pushing forward with reasonable ideas that anyone can engage with, test, and verify.
Not all ideas can be considered, especially if they lack a solid mathematical or technical basis. In complex fields like this one, rigorous testing and validation are key.
BSGS relies on extensive precomputation and memory, while Kangaroo relies on random hops without storing sets of points, they can't be combined directly. Mixing them would mean losing the efficiency of both methods, as each relies on distinct principles that don't translate into a hybrid approach.
When responding to a post, please read and understand.
"Alberto, I know and follow your work. You have great ideas and work."
and
Why are you defending the creator so much? Maybe you have something to hide too.
I saw you saying ideas, sources etc. etc. bla bla like Alberto's lawyer.
Please read and understand. There is no mention of a subject related to you, Alberto is the person who should explain or write about it.
What you do is,
"Alberto has nothing to hide."
How do you know? Are you Alberto? How close are you? Can I get your proof on this?
This is my opinion too.