Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 6. (Read 187143 times)

There is no error or bug  in this puzzle. I think this puzzle was made by one of the first users here, casascius or satoshi himself. We're scr**** to solve this.  There is no easy way.  

Absolutely!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK32jo7i5LQ

total useless for the Bitcoin 32 BTC puzzle

I still don't see anything special. In such a large set of numbers it is not unusual for groups of two, three, four or five to repeat themselves.
It would be interesting if they were repeated following a rule, or forming a pattern of some kind, but I don't see that.

Please stop spreading around this super confidential knowledge about the arabic numerals and all the secret patterns in Adobe's vector design software. I am not kidding when I also say you should consult a psychiatrist and explain to them exactly what you've discovered, they can help you further. Clearly all the experts in information theory missed the magical apotheotic hidden relationship between random font sizes and numerical angles on circles. Also, the entire group theory science community (joined by their fellow game theory enthusiasts, which usually hate each other) are now amazed by the unbelievable discovery of some repeated sequence of base 10 digits in a random output feed of fully entropic data source, that you just provided. They will now need to rethink all the combinatorial formulas and revisit the basic principles of statistics. Look what you did now. Eagerly waiting on more critical information about how you plan to find the bugs in the creator's algorithm / software, since you don't really have time to write some stupid code (who does, right? we have illlustrator these days) please the next picture you post should be the envelope from Stockholm calling you to the big ceremony for your breakthroughs with drawing lines.

Let's look at it another way!
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2024/04/26/rwvdf.gif

The video and the source of all these works are in the Telegram channel and you can download them.
https://t.me/bitcoinsolvers

Nope. There is an exact math formula for making this puzzle with some script, errors = ZERO.  
He used used a custom method like: "Type 1 Deterministic Wallet"
Masked with leading 000...0001 to set difficulty. There is no error here in arithemitic precision.

https://thebookofbitcoin.github.io/html/storage/deterministic_wallets.html

Everything else is a conspiracy theory.

No, that's definitely not what I meant, and I'm looking for a bug in wallet key generation.
  Creator said these are sequential keys from the wallet. Errors are possible. It cannot be denied. Now why did I check the keys in this way? If you want to do what the software does for me with programming, I think it will be heavy and time consuming. But in Adobe Illustrator, a lot of things are automated and I can see the changes in real time.
The problem is that you think I did all this stuff and the layout of the numbers myself, all I did was not draw a spiral circle and type the search keys one after the other and start changing the font size and spacing. Their numbers and degrees
    I got some weird stuff in some settings.
Normally nothing special is observed. I increased the font size to 11 and tested the distance between the numbers from 0 to 320, and in this case we can see some initial numbers of the keys on the opposite side.
You said that the radius and degree are correct only for the number 65 and not for 64. But I suggest you draw a line from the starting point of key number 64 to the center of the circle, you will get the wrong result. For the correct result, draw the same line as the mirror of that line from the center of the circle to the point opposite the beginning of key 64, it reaches 177.99 degrees. What is the reason for this?
Draw a diameter and start rotating with the center of the circle. You will see that the degree value corresponds to the numbers that the line crosses and there are only a few dots. You will see the numbers on the opposite side. What is the cause of this?
   Why do the key numbers correspond to the degree value? Is the reason for this a coincidence?
Why do we get correct results when the font size is 11 and the spacing between numbers is 320?
What is the relationship between 11 and 320 and wallet keys?
You say to yourself, why don't I open the 66 key? Well, this circle also covers other keys that have not been discovered yet, and there are other numbers on the path of radius, diameter, and degree, which is why I shared the same opinion. to find the correct numbers. which was ridiculed by some people. There is no problem, history has always shown that every new thought and idea is met with ridicule at first, and I did not lose anything. I am not a genius and I used my career to find the key.

Apophenia is a mental disorder to see connections and patterns between unrelated or random things that are not really there—gives rise to conspiracy theories.

It's kind of delusion... You know. our mind looks for pattern for anything and finally it finds But, it is important to consider that in this concept (Randomness) you can't use any sort of pattern in order to find the key. otherwise it's not "random".

Good luck

What is your hypothesis? that the creator has used the circle to generate the private keys?
The truth is I don't know how it could because except for the case of puzzle 65, for the rest it doesn't comply with those rules. For example, in the case of puzzle 64, the first digits of its private key are not formed with the radius of the circle and the angle, and this does not occur for the rest of the known puzzles either.

He is not joking ... He is mentally ill.

I am not digaran.
If my posts are bothering you and it is not worth it at all, I will stop posting. But know that there are many things that definitely helped to solve the keys.
My problem is my lack of knowledge in mathematics and I thought that there are people here who understand correctly.
This circle is not a simple thing, you only see a part of it.
I have been watching the thread since today like many others.
I do not post anything
Those of you who know, write and comment...
Of course, those who want to follow me or even have an opinion or idea can join this Telegram group:
https://t.me/bitcoinsolvers
It is definitely not mandatory to enter this channel and everyone can talk without restrictions without being ridiculed and the only thing that is not acceptable is insulting and mocking others.
We know that once upon a time there were people who had ideas and were even attacked and ridiculed for expressing their ideas, but with the passage of time, everyone came to that idea and theory. One of those people is Galileo... you all heard his story

Solving the puzzle with the magic circle is BS. If it was that simple, it would have already been solved.
I bet digaran is joking with us again. 

unfortunately it appears that bots are flooding this thread again. Please stay away from chatGPT and stop flooding this thread with non-sense. That won't help either your psychotic disease nor anyone else reading here.

god bless you

It's too easy to crack. Why are they prizing too high? It seems fishy

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2024/04/24/r29lN.gif
I removed the key number 65 and it is very strange that you can see all the signs of the key! This is not normal.
I drew a line from the starting point of key number 65 to the center of the circle.
The degree and length of the line in mm units correspond to the first few numbers of key 65!
Line degree: 35.68 and line length 73.72
What magic is there really? This cannot be unrelated to the production of keys.
35.68 has become 30568 and 73.72 has become 3773.
What's really going on???

You write well as per reference
But hand on practice is different
For example private key
Dec 2
Hex 2
Load Pk and see there is unconfirmed tx
See why it's not completed, analyze this tx , you will learn something, similar same lot of tx unconfirmed from 4 months , some people's still trying to hand on practice, and I have completed this subject,

Someone is going to be angry with this...

Imagine a Bitcoin giveaway with 1 BTC up for grabs. The host exposes the address and private key (a big no-no!). This creates a race condition:

• Many people try to send a transaction at once (the race starts!).
• Transactions need miner confirmation, not instantaneous processing. It's like waiting in line at a bank.
• Miners prioritize transactions with higher fees, like a fast lane with a toll.
• Person A starts first, but sets a low fee. Their transaction waits in the regular line.
• Person B sends a smaller amount with a high fee. They pay extra to jump the line.
• The block gets filled, and only transactions including Person B's smaller amount fit. It's confirmed first.
• Person A's transaction might still be valid, but there's not enough remaining to cover their intended amount + fees. They get a partial payout or nothing.

Conclusion:
Timing and fees, not starting order, determine the winner.


Source : Google Gemini

The max it can go is 4x at once.